Cargando…

Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study is to assess the rate of newly formed microcracks comparatively during root canal instrumentation by using ProTaper Next, Reciproc, and Self-Adjusting File systems using micro-computed tomography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty mesial roots of mandibular molar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cakici, Fatih, Cakici, Elif Bahar, Sadik, Burak, Keles, Ali, Fundaoglu Kucukekenci, Funda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31309188
http://dx.doi.org/10.26650/eor.201972917418
_version_ 1783432931030597632
author Cakici, Fatih
Cakici, Elif Bahar
Sadik, Burak
Keles, Ali
Fundaoglu Kucukekenci, Funda
author_facet Cakici, Fatih
Cakici, Elif Bahar
Sadik, Burak
Keles, Ali
Fundaoglu Kucukekenci, Funda
author_sort Cakici, Fatih
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study is to assess the rate of newly formed microcracks comparatively during root canal instrumentation by using ProTaper Next, Reciproc, and Self-Adjusting File systems using micro-computed tomography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty mesial roots of mandibular molars were randomly assigned to 3 experimental groups (n = 10) as follows, ProTaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File system. Preoperative and postoperative scans were obtained at the isotropic resolution of 13.68 µm. Cross-section images were examined to identify the presence of newly formed dentinal microcracks. RESULTS: The Self-Adjusting File and Reciproc systems caused a higher rate of new microcrack formation than the ProTaper Next group (p<0.001). There were also significant differences in the new microcrack formation between Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File groups (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems caused a higher rate of newly formed microcraks compared to ProTaper Next system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6612756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66127562019-07-15 Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems Cakici, Fatih Cakici, Elif Bahar Sadik, Burak Keles, Ali Fundaoglu Kucukekenci, Funda Eur Oral Res Articles PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study is to assess the rate of newly formed microcracks comparatively during root canal instrumentation by using ProTaper Next, Reciproc, and Self-Adjusting File systems using micro-computed tomography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty mesial roots of mandibular molars were randomly assigned to 3 experimental groups (n = 10) as follows, ProTaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File system. Preoperative and postoperative scans were obtained at the isotropic resolution of 13.68 µm. Cross-section images were examined to identify the presence of newly formed dentinal microcracks. RESULTS: The Self-Adjusting File and Reciproc systems caused a higher rate of new microcrack formation than the ProTaper Next group (p<0.001). There were also significant differences in the new microcrack formation between Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File groups (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems caused a higher rate of newly formed microcraks compared to ProTaper Next system. Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry 2019-01 2019-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6612756/ /pubmed/31309188 http://dx.doi.org/10.26650/eor.201972917418 Text en Copyright © 2019 European Oral Research This article is licensed under Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license ( (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses its use. The material cannot be used for commercial purposes. If the user remixes, transforms, or builds upon the material, he/she may not distribute the modified material. No warranties are given. The license may not give the user all of the permissions necessary for his/her intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how the material can be used.
spellingShingle Articles
Cakici, Fatih
Cakici, Elif Bahar
Sadik, Burak
Keles, Ali
Fundaoglu Kucukekenci, Funda
Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems
title Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems
title_full Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems
title_fullStr Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems
title_short Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems
title_sort comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31309188
http://dx.doi.org/10.26650/eor.201972917418
work_keys_str_mv AT cakicifatih comparisonofnewlyformedmicrocracksafterinstrumentationusingprotapernextreciprocandselfadjustingfilesystems
AT cakicielifbahar comparisonofnewlyformedmicrocracksafterinstrumentationusingprotapernextreciprocandselfadjustingfilesystems
AT sadikburak comparisonofnewlyformedmicrocracksafterinstrumentationusingprotapernextreciprocandselfadjustingfilesystems
AT kelesali comparisonofnewlyformedmicrocracksafterinstrumentationusingprotapernextreciprocandselfadjustingfilesystems
AT fundaoglukucukekencifunda comparisonofnewlyformedmicrocracksafterinstrumentationusingprotapernextreciprocandselfadjustingfilesystems