Cargando…
Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems
PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study is to assess the rate of newly formed microcracks comparatively during root canal instrumentation by using ProTaper Next, Reciproc, and Self-Adjusting File systems using micro-computed tomography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty mesial roots of mandibular molar...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31309188 http://dx.doi.org/10.26650/eor.201972917418 |
_version_ | 1783432931030597632 |
---|---|
author | Cakici, Fatih Cakici, Elif Bahar Sadik, Burak Keles, Ali Fundaoglu Kucukekenci, Funda |
author_facet | Cakici, Fatih Cakici, Elif Bahar Sadik, Burak Keles, Ali Fundaoglu Kucukekenci, Funda |
author_sort | Cakici, Fatih |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study is to assess the rate of newly formed microcracks comparatively during root canal instrumentation by using ProTaper Next, Reciproc, and Self-Adjusting File systems using micro-computed tomography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty mesial roots of mandibular molars were randomly assigned to 3 experimental groups (n = 10) as follows, ProTaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File system. Preoperative and postoperative scans were obtained at the isotropic resolution of 13.68 µm. Cross-section images were examined to identify the presence of newly formed dentinal microcracks. RESULTS: The Self-Adjusting File and Reciproc systems caused a higher rate of new microcrack formation than the ProTaper Next group (p<0.001). There were also significant differences in the new microcrack formation between Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File groups (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems caused a higher rate of newly formed microcraks compared to ProTaper Next system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6612756 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66127562019-07-15 Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems Cakici, Fatih Cakici, Elif Bahar Sadik, Burak Keles, Ali Fundaoglu Kucukekenci, Funda Eur Oral Res Articles PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study is to assess the rate of newly formed microcracks comparatively during root canal instrumentation by using ProTaper Next, Reciproc, and Self-Adjusting File systems using micro-computed tomography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty mesial roots of mandibular molars were randomly assigned to 3 experimental groups (n = 10) as follows, ProTaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File system. Preoperative and postoperative scans were obtained at the isotropic resolution of 13.68 µm. Cross-section images were examined to identify the presence of newly formed dentinal microcracks. RESULTS: The Self-Adjusting File and Reciproc systems caused a higher rate of new microcrack formation than the ProTaper Next group (p<0.001). There were also significant differences in the new microcrack formation between Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File groups (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems caused a higher rate of newly formed microcraks compared to ProTaper Next system. Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry 2019-01 2019-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6612756/ /pubmed/31309188 http://dx.doi.org/10.26650/eor.201972917418 Text en Copyright © 2019 European Oral Research This article is licensed under Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license ( (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses its use. The material cannot be used for commercial purposes. If the user remixes, transforms, or builds upon the material, he/she may not distribute the modified material. No warranties are given. The license may not give the user all of the permissions necessary for his/her intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how the material can be used. |
spellingShingle | Articles Cakici, Fatih Cakici, Elif Bahar Sadik, Burak Keles, Ali Fundaoglu Kucukekenci, Funda Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems |
title | Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems |
title_full | Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems |
title_fullStr | Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems |
title_short | Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems |
title_sort | comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31309188 http://dx.doi.org/10.26650/eor.201972917418 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cakicifatih comparisonofnewlyformedmicrocracksafterinstrumentationusingprotapernextreciprocandselfadjustingfilesystems AT cakicielifbahar comparisonofnewlyformedmicrocracksafterinstrumentationusingprotapernextreciprocandselfadjustingfilesystems AT sadikburak comparisonofnewlyformedmicrocracksafterinstrumentationusingprotapernextreciprocandselfadjustingfilesystems AT kelesali comparisonofnewlyformedmicrocracksafterinstrumentationusingprotapernextreciprocandselfadjustingfilesystems AT fundaoglukucukekencifunda comparisonofnewlyformedmicrocracksafterinstrumentationusingprotapernextreciprocandselfadjustingfilesystems |