Cargando…

In vitro antimicrobial activity of different electrochemically-activated solutions on enterococcus faecalis

PURPOSE: The aim of this in vitro study was to assess and compare the antimicrobial efficacy of different electrochemically-activated solutions (ECA) and contemporary irrigants, in root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis, used with or without EndoActivator (EA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A hund...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akbulut, Makbule Bilge, Unverdi Eldeniz, Ayca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31309192
http://dx.doi.org/10.26650/eor.20194564125648
_version_ 1783432932173545472
author Akbulut, Makbule Bilge
Unverdi Eldeniz, Ayca
author_facet Akbulut, Makbule Bilge
Unverdi Eldeniz, Ayca
author_sort Akbulut, Makbule Bilge
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this in vitro study was to assess and compare the antimicrobial efficacy of different electrochemically-activated solutions (ECA) and contemporary irrigants, in root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis, used with or without EndoActivator (EA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A hundred single-rooted human teeth were prepared. Ninety of the root segments were infected with E. faecalis for four weeks, and divided into eight test groups (n = 10) (four with and four without EA sonication) and a positive control (n = 10). The irrigants tested were electrochemically-activated solutions produced by the Medilox® (ECA-MX) and Envirolyte® devices (ECA-EN), 2% CHX and 2.5% NaOCl. The root specimens were irrigated with 5 mL of the test solution, with additional sonic agitation applied to the EA groups. The dentine samples that were obtained from the walls were cultured, and the antibacterial efficacy was evaluated by counting the colony-forming units. RESULTS: The ECA-EN, 2.5% NaOCl and 2% CHX were more effective than the ECA-MX (p<0.05) with the addition of EA sonication, showing no statistical difference in the elimination of E. faecalis. CONCLUSION: The ECA-EN shows potential as an endodontic irrigant, while EA usage gives no benefit in reducing bacteria from root canals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6612761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66127612019-07-15 In vitro antimicrobial activity of different electrochemically-activated solutions on enterococcus faecalis Akbulut, Makbule Bilge Unverdi Eldeniz, Ayca Eur Oral Res Articles PURPOSE: The aim of this in vitro study was to assess and compare the antimicrobial efficacy of different electrochemically-activated solutions (ECA) and contemporary irrigants, in root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis, used with or without EndoActivator (EA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A hundred single-rooted human teeth were prepared. Ninety of the root segments were infected with E. faecalis for four weeks, and divided into eight test groups (n = 10) (four with and four without EA sonication) and a positive control (n = 10). The irrigants tested were electrochemically-activated solutions produced by the Medilox® (ECA-MX) and Envirolyte® devices (ECA-EN), 2% CHX and 2.5% NaOCl. The root specimens were irrigated with 5 mL of the test solution, with additional sonic agitation applied to the EA groups. The dentine samples that were obtained from the walls were cultured, and the antibacterial efficacy was evaluated by counting the colony-forming units. RESULTS: The ECA-EN, 2.5% NaOCl and 2% CHX were more effective than the ECA-MX (p<0.05) with the addition of EA sonication, showing no statistical difference in the elimination of E. faecalis. CONCLUSION: The ECA-EN shows potential as an endodontic irrigant, while EA usage gives no benefit in reducing bacteria from root canals. Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry 2019-01 2019-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6612761/ /pubmed/31309192 http://dx.doi.org/10.26650/eor.20194564125648 Text en Copyright © 2019 European Oral Research This article is licensed under Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license ( (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses its use. The material cannot be used for commercial purposes. If the user remixes, transforms, or builds upon the material, he/she may not distribute the modified material. No warranties are given. The license may not give the user all of the permissions necessary for his/her intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how the material can be used.
spellingShingle Articles
Akbulut, Makbule Bilge
Unverdi Eldeniz, Ayca
In vitro antimicrobial activity of different electrochemically-activated solutions on enterococcus faecalis
title In vitro antimicrobial activity of different electrochemically-activated solutions on enterococcus faecalis
title_full In vitro antimicrobial activity of different electrochemically-activated solutions on enterococcus faecalis
title_fullStr In vitro antimicrobial activity of different electrochemically-activated solutions on enterococcus faecalis
title_full_unstemmed In vitro antimicrobial activity of different electrochemically-activated solutions on enterococcus faecalis
title_short In vitro antimicrobial activity of different electrochemically-activated solutions on enterococcus faecalis
title_sort in vitro antimicrobial activity of different electrochemically-activated solutions on enterococcus faecalis
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31309192
http://dx.doi.org/10.26650/eor.20194564125648
work_keys_str_mv AT akbulutmakbulebilge invitroantimicrobialactivityofdifferentelectrochemicallyactivatedsolutionsonenterococcusfaecalis
AT unverdieldenizayca invitroantimicrobialactivityofdifferentelectrochemicallyactivatedsolutionsonenterococcusfaecalis