Cargando…

A model for meta-analysis of correlated binary outcomes: The case of split-body interventions

In several areas of clinical research, it is common for trials to assign different sites of the participants’ bodies to different interventions. For example, a randomized controlled trial comparing surgical techniques for correcting myopia may randomize each eye of a participant to a different opera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Efthimiou, Orestis, Mavridis, Dimitris, Nikolakopoulou, Adriani, Rücker, Gerta, Trelle, Sven, Egger, Matthias, Salanti, Georgia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29233084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280217746436
_version_ 1783433008883171328
author Efthimiou, Orestis
Mavridis, Dimitris
Nikolakopoulou, Adriani
Rücker, Gerta
Trelle, Sven
Egger, Matthias
Salanti, Georgia
author_facet Efthimiou, Orestis
Mavridis, Dimitris
Nikolakopoulou, Adriani
Rücker, Gerta
Trelle, Sven
Egger, Matthias
Salanti, Georgia
author_sort Efthimiou, Orestis
collection PubMed
description In several areas of clinical research, it is common for trials to assign different sites of the participants’ bodies to different interventions. For example, a randomized controlled trial comparing surgical techniques for correcting myopia may randomize each eye of a participant to a different operation. Under such bilateral (‘split-body’) interventions, the observations from each participant are correlated. It is challenging to account for these correlations at the meta-analysis level, especially when the outcome is rare. Here, we present a meta-analysis model based on the bivariate binomial distribution. Our model can synthesize studies on patients who received one intervention at one body site, patients who received two interventions at different sites or a mixture of these two groups. The model can analyse studies with zero events in one or both treatment arms and can handle the case of incomplete data reporting. We use simulations to assess the performance of our model and to compare it with the bivariate beta-binomial model. In the case of bilateral interventions, our model performed well and outperformed the bivariate beta-binomial model in all scenarios explored. We illustrate our methods using two previously published meta-analyses from the fields of orthopaedics and ophthalmology. We conclude that our model constitutes a useful new tool for the meta-analysis of binary outcomes in the presence of split-body interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6613182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66131822019-07-24 A model for meta-analysis of correlated binary outcomes: The case of split-body interventions Efthimiou, Orestis Mavridis, Dimitris Nikolakopoulou, Adriani Rücker, Gerta Trelle, Sven Egger, Matthias Salanti, Georgia Stat Methods Med Res Articles In several areas of clinical research, it is common for trials to assign different sites of the participants’ bodies to different interventions. For example, a randomized controlled trial comparing surgical techniques for correcting myopia may randomize each eye of a participant to a different operation. Under such bilateral (‘split-body’) interventions, the observations from each participant are correlated. It is challenging to account for these correlations at the meta-analysis level, especially when the outcome is rare. Here, we present a meta-analysis model based on the bivariate binomial distribution. Our model can synthesize studies on patients who received one intervention at one body site, patients who received two interventions at different sites or a mixture of these two groups. The model can analyse studies with zero events in one or both treatment arms and can handle the case of incomplete data reporting. We use simulations to assess the performance of our model and to compare it with the bivariate beta-binomial model. In the case of bilateral interventions, our model performed well and outperformed the bivariate beta-binomial model in all scenarios explored. We illustrate our methods using two previously published meta-analyses from the fields of orthopaedics and ophthalmology. We conclude that our model constitutes a useful new tool for the meta-analysis of binary outcomes in the presence of split-body interventions. SAGE Publications 2017-12-12 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6613182/ /pubmed/29233084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280217746436 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Efthimiou, Orestis
Mavridis, Dimitris
Nikolakopoulou, Adriani
Rücker, Gerta
Trelle, Sven
Egger, Matthias
Salanti, Georgia
A model for meta-analysis of correlated binary outcomes: The case of split-body interventions
title A model for meta-analysis of correlated binary outcomes: The case of split-body interventions
title_full A model for meta-analysis of correlated binary outcomes: The case of split-body interventions
title_fullStr A model for meta-analysis of correlated binary outcomes: The case of split-body interventions
title_full_unstemmed A model for meta-analysis of correlated binary outcomes: The case of split-body interventions
title_short A model for meta-analysis of correlated binary outcomes: The case of split-body interventions
title_sort model for meta-analysis of correlated binary outcomes: the case of split-body interventions
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29233084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280217746436
work_keys_str_mv AT efthimiouorestis amodelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions
AT mavridisdimitris amodelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions
AT nikolakopoulouadriani amodelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions
AT ruckergerta amodelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions
AT trellesven amodelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions
AT eggermatthias amodelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions
AT salantigeorgia amodelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions
AT efthimiouorestis modelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions
AT mavridisdimitris modelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions
AT nikolakopoulouadriani modelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions
AT ruckergerta modelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions
AT trellesven modelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions
AT eggermatthias modelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions
AT salantigeorgia modelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions