Cargando…
A model for meta-analysis of correlated binary outcomes: The case of split-body interventions
In several areas of clinical research, it is common for trials to assign different sites of the participants’ bodies to different interventions. For example, a randomized controlled trial comparing surgical techniques for correcting myopia may randomize each eye of a participant to a different opera...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29233084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280217746436 |
_version_ | 1783433008883171328 |
---|---|
author | Efthimiou, Orestis Mavridis, Dimitris Nikolakopoulou, Adriani Rücker, Gerta Trelle, Sven Egger, Matthias Salanti, Georgia |
author_facet | Efthimiou, Orestis Mavridis, Dimitris Nikolakopoulou, Adriani Rücker, Gerta Trelle, Sven Egger, Matthias Salanti, Georgia |
author_sort | Efthimiou, Orestis |
collection | PubMed |
description | In several areas of clinical research, it is common for trials to assign different sites of the participants’ bodies to different interventions. For example, a randomized controlled trial comparing surgical techniques for correcting myopia may randomize each eye of a participant to a different operation. Under such bilateral (‘split-body’) interventions, the observations from each participant are correlated. It is challenging to account for these correlations at the meta-analysis level, especially when the outcome is rare. Here, we present a meta-analysis model based on the bivariate binomial distribution. Our model can synthesize studies on patients who received one intervention at one body site, patients who received two interventions at different sites or a mixture of these two groups. The model can analyse studies with zero events in one or both treatment arms and can handle the case of incomplete data reporting. We use simulations to assess the performance of our model and to compare it with the bivariate beta-binomial model. In the case of bilateral interventions, our model performed well and outperformed the bivariate beta-binomial model in all scenarios explored. We illustrate our methods using two previously published meta-analyses from the fields of orthopaedics and ophthalmology. We conclude that our model constitutes a useful new tool for the meta-analysis of binary outcomes in the presence of split-body interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6613182 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66131822019-07-24 A model for meta-analysis of correlated binary outcomes: The case of split-body interventions Efthimiou, Orestis Mavridis, Dimitris Nikolakopoulou, Adriani Rücker, Gerta Trelle, Sven Egger, Matthias Salanti, Georgia Stat Methods Med Res Articles In several areas of clinical research, it is common for trials to assign different sites of the participants’ bodies to different interventions. For example, a randomized controlled trial comparing surgical techniques for correcting myopia may randomize each eye of a participant to a different operation. Under such bilateral (‘split-body’) interventions, the observations from each participant are correlated. It is challenging to account for these correlations at the meta-analysis level, especially when the outcome is rare. Here, we present a meta-analysis model based on the bivariate binomial distribution. Our model can synthesize studies on patients who received one intervention at one body site, patients who received two interventions at different sites or a mixture of these two groups. The model can analyse studies with zero events in one or both treatment arms and can handle the case of incomplete data reporting. We use simulations to assess the performance of our model and to compare it with the bivariate beta-binomial model. In the case of bilateral interventions, our model performed well and outperformed the bivariate beta-binomial model in all scenarios explored. We illustrate our methods using two previously published meta-analyses from the fields of orthopaedics and ophthalmology. We conclude that our model constitutes a useful new tool for the meta-analysis of binary outcomes in the presence of split-body interventions. SAGE Publications 2017-12-12 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6613182/ /pubmed/29233084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280217746436 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Articles Efthimiou, Orestis Mavridis, Dimitris Nikolakopoulou, Adriani Rücker, Gerta Trelle, Sven Egger, Matthias Salanti, Georgia A model for meta-analysis of correlated binary outcomes: The case of split-body interventions |
title | A model for meta-analysis of correlated binary outcomes: The case of
split-body interventions |
title_full | A model for meta-analysis of correlated binary outcomes: The case of
split-body interventions |
title_fullStr | A model for meta-analysis of correlated binary outcomes: The case of
split-body interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | A model for meta-analysis of correlated binary outcomes: The case of
split-body interventions |
title_short | A model for meta-analysis of correlated binary outcomes: The case of
split-body interventions |
title_sort | model for meta-analysis of correlated binary outcomes: the case of
split-body interventions |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29233084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280217746436 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT efthimiouorestis amodelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions AT mavridisdimitris amodelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions AT nikolakopoulouadriani amodelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions AT ruckergerta amodelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions AT trellesven amodelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions AT eggermatthias amodelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions AT salantigeorgia amodelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions AT efthimiouorestis modelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions AT mavridisdimitris modelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions AT nikolakopoulouadriani modelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions AT ruckergerta modelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions AT trellesven modelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions AT eggermatthias modelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions AT salantigeorgia modelformetaanalysisofcorrelatedbinaryoutcomesthecaseofsplitbodyinterventions |