Cargando…

Assessing the clinical utility of the diabetes eating problem survey‐revised (DEPS‐R) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE: Eating disorders are prevalent among adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). We examined the clinical utility of the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey‐Revised (DEPS‐R), a brief self‐report questionnaire developed for patients with T1D, to identify at‐risk adolescents. We aimed to determine w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryman, Brianna, MacIsaac, Jenna, Robinson, Tracy, Miller, Michael R., Herold Gallego, Patricia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31294083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/edm2.67
_version_ 1783433011201572864
author Ryman, Brianna
MacIsaac, Jenna
Robinson, Tracy
Miller, Michael R.
Herold Gallego, Patricia
author_facet Ryman, Brianna
MacIsaac, Jenna
Robinson, Tracy
Miller, Michael R.
Herold Gallego, Patricia
author_sort Ryman, Brianna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Eating disorders are prevalent among adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). We examined the clinical utility of the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey‐Revised (DEPS‐R), a brief self‐report questionnaire developed for patients with T1D, to identify at‐risk adolescents. We aimed to determine whether a positive DEPS‐R screen was predictive of a formal diagnosis of an eating disorder as per the DSM‐V. In addition, we assessed whether other variables including psychosocial characteristics and diabetes conflict were associated with an abnormal DEPS‐R screen. METHODS: Cross‐sectional study of 116 T1D adolescents aged 12‐17 years. All participants completed the DEPS‐R screening; both participants and parents completed a questionnaire addressing psychosocial characteristics/conflict around diabetes management. Clinical variables were obtained from participant charts. Differences were examined between positive and negative DEPS‐R groups. Adolescents who screened positive were offered a referral to a specialized eating disorder team for further assessment. RESULTS: From 116 participants (mean age ± SD = 14.6 years ± 1.56), 21% (24/116) scored positive for DEPS‐R More females than males had abnormal DEPS‐R (75% vs 25%, P = 0.001). Those with positive DEPS‐R score had higher HbA1c% (mean = 9.3 ± 1.3 vs 8.3 ± 1.2, P = 0.001). Positive DEPS‐R group had higher conflict score for diabetes management in both parents’ and children's assessments (both ps < 0.001). In regression analysis, being female (OR males = 0.07, 95%CI: 0.010‐0.46, P = 0.006), older (OR = 2.01, 95%CI: 1.16‐3.48, P = 0.040) and > child‐reported conflict (OR = 1.78, 95%CI: 1.02‐3.11, P = 0.044) were predictors of an abnormal DEPS‐R score. CONCLUSION: The DEPS‐R score is a useful clinical tool for identifying T1D adolescents at risk for disordered eating behaviour, but has a low positive predictive value (PPV) for identifying adolescents who meet diagnostic criteria for an eating disorder. Female gender, suboptimal diabetes control and increased conflict in diabetes management are associated with an abnormal DEPS‐R score.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6613221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66132212019-07-10 Assessing the clinical utility of the diabetes eating problem survey‐revised (DEPS‐R) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes Ryman, Brianna MacIsaac, Jenna Robinson, Tracy Miller, Michael R. Herold Gallego, Patricia Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Eating disorders are prevalent among adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). We examined the clinical utility of the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey‐Revised (DEPS‐R), a brief self‐report questionnaire developed for patients with T1D, to identify at‐risk adolescents. We aimed to determine whether a positive DEPS‐R screen was predictive of a formal diagnosis of an eating disorder as per the DSM‐V. In addition, we assessed whether other variables including psychosocial characteristics and diabetes conflict were associated with an abnormal DEPS‐R screen. METHODS: Cross‐sectional study of 116 T1D adolescents aged 12‐17 years. All participants completed the DEPS‐R screening; both participants and parents completed a questionnaire addressing psychosocial characteristics/conflict around diabetes management. Clinical variables were obtained from participant charts. Differences were examined between positive and negative DEPS‐R groups. Adolescents who screened positive were offered a referral to a specialized eating disorder team for further assessment. RESULTS: From 116 participants (mean age ± SD = 14.6 years ± 1.56), 21% (24/116) scored positive for DEPS‐R More females than males had abnormal DEPS‐R (75% vs 25%, P = 0.001). Those with positive DEPS‐R score had higher HbA1c% (mean = 9.3 ± 1.3 vs 8.3 ± 1.2, P = 0.001). Positive DEPS‐R group had higher conflict score for diabetes management in both parents’ and children's assessments (both ps < 0.001). In regression analysis, being female (OR males = 0.07, 95%CI: 0.010‐0.46, P = 0.006), older (OR = 2.01, 95%CI: 1.16‐3.48, P = 0.040) and > child‐reported conflict (OR = 1.78, 95%CI: 1.02‐3.11, P = 0.044) were predictors of an abnormal DEPS‐R score. CONCLUSION: The DEPS‐R score is a useful clinical tool for identifying T1D adolescents at risk for disordered eating behaviour, but has a low positive predictive value (PPV) for identifying adolescents who meet diagnostic criteria for an eating disorder. Female gender, suboptimal diabetes control and increased conflict in diabetes management are associated with an abnormal DEPS‐R score. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6613221/ /pubmed/31294083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/edm2.67 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ryman, Brianna
MacIsaac, Jenna
Robinson, Tracy
Miller, Michael R.
Herold Gallego, Patricia
Assessing the clinical utility of the diabetes eating problem survey‐revised (DEPS‐R) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes
title Assessing the clinical utility of the diabetes eating problem survey‐revised (DEPS‐R) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes
title_full Assessing the clinical utility of the diabetes eating problem survey‐revised (DEPS‐R) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes
title_fullStr Assessing the clinical utility of the diabetes eating problem survey‐revised (DEPS‐R) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the clinical utility of the diabetes eating problem survey‐revised (DEPS‐R) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes
title_short Assessing the clinical utility of the diabetes eating problem survey‐revised (DEPS‐R) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes
title_sort assessing the clinical utility of the diabetes eating problem survey‐revised (deps‐r) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31294083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/edm2.67
work_keys_str_mv AT rymanbrianna assessingtheclinicalutilityofthediabeteseatingproblemsurveyreviseddepsrinadolescentswithtype1diabetes
AT macisaacjenna assessingtheclinicalutilityofthediabeteseatingproblemsurveyreviseddepsrinadolescentswithtype1diabetes
AT robinsontracy assessingtheclinicalutilityofthediabeteseatingproblemsurveyreviseddepsrinadolescentswithtype1diabetes
AT millermichaelr assessingtheclinicalutilityofthediabeteseatingproblemsurveyreviseddepsrinadolescentswithtype1diabetes
AT heroldgallegopatricia assessingtheclinicalutilityofthediabeteseatingproblemsurveyreviseddepsrinadolescentswithtype1diabetes