Cargando…
Test equating sleep scales: applying the Leunbach’s model
BACKGROUND: In most cases, the total scores from different instruments assessing the same construct are not directly comparable, but must be equated. In this study we aimed to illustrate a novel test equating methodology applied to sleep functions, a domain in which few score comparability studies e...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31286889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0768-y |
_version_ | 1783433018540556288 |
---|---|
author | Adroher, Núria Duran Kreiner, Svend Young, Carolyn Mills, Roger Tennant, Alan |
author_facet | Adroher, Núria Duran Kreiner, Svend Young, Carolyn Mills, Roger Tennant, Alan |
author_sort | Adroher, Núria Duran |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In most cases, the total scores from different instruments assessing the same construct are not directly comparable, but must be equated. In this study we aimed to illustrate a novel test equating methodology applied to sleep functions, a domain in which few score comparability studies exist. METHODS: Eight scales from two cross-sectional self-report studies were considered, and one scale was common to both studies. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) was used to establish content comparability. Direct (common persons) and indirect (common item) equating was assessed by means of Leunbach’s model, which equates the scores of two scales depending on the same person parameter, taking into account several tests of fit and the Standard Error of Equating (SEE). RESULTS: All items were linked to the body functions category b134 of the ICF, which corresponds to ‘Sleep functions’. The scales were classified into three sleep aspects: four scales were assessing mainly sleep disturbance, one quality of sleep, and three impact of sleep on daily life. Of 16 direct equated pairs, 15 could be equated according to Leunbach’s model, and of 12 indirect equated pairs, 8 could be equated. Raw score conversion tables between each of these 23 equated pairs are provided. The SEE was higher for indirect than for direct equating. Pairs measuring the same sleep aspect did not show better fit indices than pairs from different aspects. The instruments mapped to a higher order concept of sleep functions. CONCLUSION: Leunbach’s equating model has been successfully applied to a functioning domain little explored in test equating. This novel methodology, together with the ICF, enables comparison of clinical outcomes and research results, and facilitates communication among clinicians. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-019-0768-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6613254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66132542019-07-17 Test equating sleep scales: applying the Leunbach’s model Adroher, Núria Duran Kreiner, Svend Young, Carolyn Mills, Roger Tennant, Alan BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: In most cases, the total scores from different instruments assessing the same construct are not directly comparable, but must be equated. In this study we aimed to illustrate a novel test equating methodology applied to sleep functions, a domain in which few score comparability studies exist. METHODS: Eight scales from two cross-sectional self-report studies were considered, and one scale was common to both studies. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) was used to establish content comparability. Direct (common persons) and indirect (common item) equating was assessed by means of Leunbach’s model, which equates the scores of two scales depending on the same person parameter, taking into account several tests of fit and the Standard Error of Equating (SEE). RESULTS: All items were linked to the body functions category b134 of the ICF, which corresponds to ‘Sleep functions’. The scales were classified into three sleep aspects: four scales were assessing mainly sleep disturbance, one quality of sleep, and three impact of sleep on daily life. Of 16 direct equated pairs, 15 could be equated according to Leunbach’s model, and of 12 indirect equated pairs, 8 could be equated. Raw score conversion tables between each of these 23 equated pairs are provided. The SEE was higher for indirect than for direct equating. Pairs measuring the same sleep aspect did not show better fit indices than pairs from different aspects. The instruments mapped to a higher order concept of sleep functions. CONCLUSION: Leunbach’s equating model has been successfully applied to a functioning domain little explored in test equating. This novel methodology, together with the ICF, enables comparison of clinical outcomes and research results, and facilitates communication among clinicians. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-019-0768-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6613254/ /pubmed/31286889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0768-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Adroher, Núria Duran Kreiner, Svend Young, Carolyn Mills, Roger Tennant, Alan Test equating sleep scales: applying the Leunbach’s model |
title | Test equating sleep scales: applying the Leunbach’s model |
title_full | Test equating sleep scales: applying the Leunbach’s model |
title_fullStr | Test equating sleep scales: applying the Leunbach’s model |
title_full_unstemmed | Test equating sleep scales: applying the Leunbach’s model |
title_short | Test equating sleep scales: applying the Leunbach’s model |
title_sort | test equating sleep scales: applying the leunbach’s model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31286889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0768-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adrohernuriaduran testequatingsleepscalesapplyingtheleunbachsmodel AT kreinersvend testequatingsleepscalesapplyingtheleunbachsmodel AT youngcarolyn testequatingsleepscalesapplyingtheleunbachsmodel AT millsroger testequatingsleepscalesapplyingtheleunbachsmodel AT tennantalan testequatingsleepscalesapplyingtheleunbachsmodel |