Cargando…

Eliciting ERP Components for Morphosyntactic Agreement Mismatches in Perfectly Grammatical Sentences

The present event-related brain potential (ERP) study investigates mechanisms underlying the processing of morphosyntactic information during real-time auditory sentence comprehension in French. Employing an auditory-visual sentence-picture matching paradigm, we investigated two types of anomalies u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Courteau, Émilie, Martignetti, Lisa, Royle, Phaedra, Steinhauer, Karsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31312150
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01152
_version_ 1783433042077941760
author Courteau, Émilie
Martignetti, Lisa
Royle, Phaedra
Steinhauer, Karsten
author_facet Courteau, Émilie
Martignetti, Lisa
Royle, Phaedra
Steinhauer, Karsten
author_sort Courteau, Émilie
collection PubMed
description The present event-related brain potential (ERP) study investigates mechanisms underlying the processing of morphosyntactic information during real-time auditory sentence comprehension in French. Employing an auditory-visual sentence-picture matching paradigm, we investigated two types of anomalies using entirely grammatical auditory stimuli: (i) semantic mismatches between visually presented actions and spoken verbs, and (ii) number mismatches between visually presented agents and corresponding morphosyntactic number markers in the spoken sentences (determiners, pronouns in liaison contexts, and verb-final “inflection”). We varied the type and amount of number cues available in each sentence using two manipulations. First, we manipulated the verb type, by using verbs whose number cue was audible through subject (clitic) pronoun liaison (liaison verbs) as well as verbs whose number cue was audible on the verb ending (consonant-final verbs). Second, we manipulated the pre-verbal context: each sentence was preceded either by a neutral context providing no number cue, or by a subject noun phrase containing a subject number cue on the determiner. Twenty-two French-speaking adults participated in the experiment. While sentence judgment accuracy was high, participants' ERP responses were modulated by the type of mismatch encountered. Lexico-semantic mismatches on the verb elicited the expected N400 and additional negativities. Determiner number mismatches elicited early anterior negativities, N400s and P600s. Verb number mismatches elicited biphasic N400-P600 patterns. However, pronoun + verb liaison mismatches yielded this pattern only in the plural, while consonant-final changes did so in the singular and the plural. Furthermore, an additional sustained frontal negativity was observed in two of the four verb mismatch conditions: plural liaison and singular consonant-final forms. This study highlights the different contributions of number cues in oral language processing and is the first to investigate whether auditory-visual mismatches can elicit errors reminiscent of outright grammatical errors. Our results emphasize that neurocognitive mechanisms underlying number agreement in French are modulated by the type of cue that is used to identify auditory-visual mismatches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6613437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66134372019-07-16 Eliciting ERP Components for Morphosyntactic Agreement Mismatches in Perfectly Grammatical Sentences Courteau, Émilie Martignetti, Lisa Royle, Phaedra Steinhauer, Karsten Front Psychol Psychology The present event-related brain potential (ERP) study investigates mechanisms underlying the processing of morphosyntactic information during real-time auditory sentence comprehension in French. Employing an auditory-visual sentence-picture matching paradigm, we investigated two types of anomalies using entirely grammatical auditory stimuli: (i) semantic mismatches between visually presented actions and spoken verbs, and (ii) number mismatches between visually presented agents and corresponding morphosyntactic number markers in the spoken sentences (determiners, pronouns in liaison contexts, and verb-final “inflection”). We varied the type and amount of number cues available in each sentence using two manipulations. First, we manipulated the verb type, by using verbs whose number cue was audible through subject (clitic) pronoun liaison (liaison verbs) as well as verbs whose number cue was audible on the verb ending (consonant-final verbs). Second, we manipulated the pre-verbal context: each sentence was preceded either by a neutral context providing no number cue, or by a subject noun phrase containing a subject number cue on the determiner. Twenty-two French-speaking adults participated in the experiment. While sentence judgment accuracy was high, participants' ERP responses were modulated by the type of mismatch encountered. Lexico-semantic mismatches on the verb elicited the expected N400 and additional negativities. Determiner number mismatches elicited early anterior negativities, N400s and P600s. Verb number mismatches elicited biphasic N400-P600 patterns. However, pronoun + verb liaison mismatches yielded this pattern only in the plural, while consonant-final changes did so in the singular and the plural. Furthermore, an additional sustained frontal negativity was observed in two of the four verb mismatch conditions: plural liaison and singular consonant-final forms. This study highlights the different contributions of number cues in oral language processing and is the first to investigate whether auditory-visual mismatches can elicit errors reminiscent of outright grammatical errors. Our results emphasize that neurocognitive mechanisms underlying number agreement in French are modulated by the type of cue that is used to identify auditory-visual mismatches. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6613437/ /pubmed/31312150 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01152 Text en Copyright © 2019 Courteau, Martignetti, Royle and Steinhauer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Courteau, Émilie
Martignetti, Lisa
Royle, Phaedra
Steinhauer, Karsten
Eliciting ERP Components for Morphosyntactic Agreement Mismatches in Perfectly Grammatical Sentences
title Eliciting ERP Components for Morphosyntactic Agreement Mismatches in Perfectly Grammatical Sentences
title_full Eliciting ERP Components for Morphosyntactic Agreement Mismatches in Perfectly Grammatical Sentences
title_fullStr Eliciting ERP Components for Morphosyntactic Agreement Mismatches in Perfectly Grammatical Sentences
title_full_unstemmed Eliciting ERP Components for Morphosyntactic Agreement Mismatches in Perfectly Grammatical Sentences
title_short Eliciting ERP Components for Morphosyntactic Agreement Mismatches in Perfectly Grammatical Sentences
title_sort eliciting erp components for morphosyntactic agreement mismatches in perfectly grammatical sentences
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31312150
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01152
work_keys_str_mv AT courteauemilie elicitingerpcomponentsformorphosyntacticagreementmismatchesinperfectlygrammaticalsentences
AT martignettilisa elicitingerpcomponentsformorphosyntacticagreementmismatchesinperfectlygrammaticalsentences
AT roylephaedra elicitingerpcomponentsformorphosyntacticagreementmismatchesinperfectlygrammaticalsentences
AT steinhauerkarsten elicitingerpcomponentsformorphosyntacticagreementmismatchesinperfectlygrammaticalsentences