Cargando…

Depression and Sequential Decision-Making Revisited

Background: The effect of depression on decision-making is an important but still an unsettled issue. Although most studies have reported that clinically depressed participants show worse performance, there are also studies that have shown no or even positive effects. Specifically, von Helversen et...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sander, Martha, Nestler, Steffen, Egloff, Boris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31312159
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01492
_version_ 1783433042801459200
author Sander, Martha
Nestler, Steffen
Egloff, Boris
author_facet Sander, Martha
Nestler, Steffen
Egloff, Boris
author_sort Sander, Martha
collection PubMed
description Background: The effect of depression on decision-making is an important but still an unsettled issue. Although most studies have reported that clinically depressed participants show worse performance, there are also studies that have shown no or even positive effects. Specifically, von Helversen et al. (2011) were able to document a positive effect of depression on task performance in a sequential decision-making task called the secretary problem (SP). Here, we (1) aimed to replicate this study in an extended version using more trials and (2) modified it by including an additional condition in which negative feedback was given. Method: Eighty-two participants took part. They were split into two groups: 20/21 participants with major depression disorder (MDD) and 20/21 matched healthy participants. Participants completed the secretary problem either in the standard or in a modified version. Additionally, they answered questionnaires for assessing depression, personality, and intelligence. Results: We did not find any significant differences between clinically depressed and nondepressed individuals in any indicators of task performance, under both the original and modified conditions. Limitations: Our participants were ambulatory patients. The quality of depression may have been therefore less extreme. We did not assess or control for rumination. Conclusions: We were not able to detect any significant differences between the performances of healthy and clinically depressed participants in a sequential decision-making task.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6613440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66134402019-07-16 Depression and Sequential Decision-Making Revisited Sander, Martha Nestler, Steffen Egloff, Boris Front Psychol Psychology Background: The effect of depression on decision-making is an important but still an unsettled issue. Although most studies have reported that clinically depressed participants show worse performance, there are also studies that have shown no or even positive effects. Specifically, von Helversen et al. (2011) were able to document a positive effect of depression on task performance in a sequential decision-making task called the secretary problem (SP). Here, we (1) aimed to replicate this study in an extended version using more trials and (2) modified it by including an additional condition in which negative feedback was given. Method: Eighty-two participants took part. They were split into two groups: 20/21 participants with major depression disorder (MDD) and 20/21 matched healthy participants. Participants completed the secretary problem either in the standard or in a modified version. Additionally, they answered questionnaires for assessing depression, personality, and intelligence. Results: We did not find any significant differences between clinically depressed and nondepressed individuals in any indicators of task performance, under both the original and modified conditions. Limitations: Our participants were ambulatory patients. The quality of depression may have been therefore less extreme. We did not assess or control for rumination. Conclusions: We were not able to detect any significant differences between the performances of healthy and clinically depressed participants in a sequential decision-making task. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6613440/ /pubmed/31312159 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01492 Text en Copyright © 2019 Sander, Nestler and Egloff. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Sander, Martha
Nestler, Steffen
Egloff, Boris
Depression and Sequential Decision-Making Revisited
title Depression and Sequential Decision-Making Revisited
title_full Depression and Sequential Decision-Making Revisited
title_fullStr Depression and Sequential Decision-Making Revisited
title_full_unstemmed Depression and Sequential Decision-Making Revisited
title_short Depression and Sequential Decision-Making Revisited
title_sort depression and sequential decision-making revisited
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31312159
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01492
work_keys_str_mv AT sandermartha depressionandsequentialdecisionmakingrevisited
AT nestlersteffen depressionandsequentialdecisionmakingrevisited
AT egloffboris depressionandsequentialdecisionmakingrevisited