Cargando…

Modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic factor for renal cell carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: The modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), a combination of C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin levels, reflects systemic inflammation and nutritional status. This score has been shown to have prognosis value for various tumors. In the present study, we evaluated the prognostic value...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Xu, Wang, Yan, Yang, Wei-Xiao, Dou, Wei-Chao, Shao, Yan-Xiang, Li, Xiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31308752
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S208839
_version_ 1783433062128812032
author Hu, Xu
Wang, Yan
Yang, Wei-Xiao
Dou, Wei-Chao
Shao, Yan-Xiang
Li, Xiang
author_facet Hu, Xu
Wang, Yan
Yang, Wei-Xiao
Dou, Wei-Chao
Shao, Yan-Xiang
Li, Xiang
author_sort Hu, Xu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), a combination of C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin levels, reflects systemic inflammation and nutritional status. This score has been shown to have prognosis value for various tumors. In the present study, we evaluated the prognostic value of mGPS for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: Literature search was conducted based on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to December 2018. We pooled HRs and 95% CIs to evaluate the correlation between mGPS and survival in patients with RCC. RESULTS: Twelve studies comprising 2,391 patients were included in the present study for quantitative synthesis. Our studies demonstrated that higher mGPS was significantly correlated to poor overall survival (HR=4.31; 95%CI, 2.78–6.68; P<0.001), cancer-specific survival (HR=5.88; 95%CI, 3.93–8.78; P<0.001), recurrence-free survival (HR=3.15; 95%CI, 2.07–4.79; P<0.001), and progression-free survival (HR=1.91; 95%CI, 1.27–2.89; P=0.002). Subgroup analyses also confirmed the overall results. CONCLUSION: mGPS could serve as a predictive tool for the survival of patients with RCC. In the different subgroups, the results are also consistent with previous results. In conclusion, pretreatment higher mGPS is associated with poorer survival in patients with RCC. Further external validations are necessary to strengthen this concept.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6613602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66136022019-07-15 Modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic factor for renal cell carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hu, Xu Wang, Yan Yang, Wei-Xiao Dou, Wei-Chao Shao, Yan-Xiang Li, Xiang Cancer Manag Res Review OBJECTIVE: The modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), a combination of C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin levels, reflects systemic inflammation and nutritional status. This score has been shown to have prognosis value for various tumors. In the present study, we evaluated the prognostic value of mGPS for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: Literature search was conducted based on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to December 2018. We pooled HRs and 95% CIs to evaluate the correlation between mGPS and survival in patients with RCC. RESULTS: Twelve studies comprising 2,391 patients were included in the present study for quantitative synthesis. Our studies demonstrated that higher mGPS was significantly correlated to poor overall survival (HR=4.31; 95%CI, 2.78–6.68; P<0.001), cancer-specific survival (HR=5.88; 95%CI, 3.93–8.78; P<0.001), recurrence-free survival (HR=3.15; 95%CI, 2.07–4.79; P<0.001), and progression-free survival (HR=1.91; 95%CI, 1.27–2.89; P=0.002). Subgroup analyses also confirmed the overall results. CONCLUSION: mGPS could serve as a predictive tool for the survival of patients with RCC. In the different subgroups, the results are also consistent with previous results. In conclusion, pretreatment higher mGPS is associated with poorer survival in patients with RCC. Further external validations are necessary to strengthen this concept. Dove 2019-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6613602/ /pubmed/31308752 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S208839 Text en © 2019 Hu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Hu, Xu
Wang, Yan
Yang, Wei-Xiao
Dou, Wei-Chao
Shao, Yan-Xiang
Li, Xiang
Modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic factor for renal cell carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic factor for renal cell carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic factor for renal cell carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic factor for renal cell carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic factor for renal cell carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic factor for renal cell carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort modified glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic factor for renal cell carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31308752
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S208839
work_keys_str_mv AT huxu modifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticfactorforrenalcellcarcinomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangyan modifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticfactorforrenalcellcarcinomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangweixiao modifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticfactorforrenalcellcarcinomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT douweichao modifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticfactorforrenalcellcarcinomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shaoyanxiang modifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticfactorforrenalcellcarcinomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lixiang modifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticfactorforrenalcellcarcinomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis