Cargando…
Arm port vs chest port: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Two prevailing, totally implantable venous access ports are routinely utilized in oncology: chest port or arm port. This systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted to compare safety and efficiency of the two techniques. METHODS: We performed evidence acquisition intensively from...
Autores principales: | Li, Guanhua, Zhang, Yu, Ma, Hongmin, Zheng, Junmeng |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31308748 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S205988 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison between Arm Port and Chest Port for Optimal Vascular Access Port in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
por: Liu, Ye, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Three-port versus four-port technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Nip, Lawrence, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Hybrid Single-Port Cholecystectomy Vs Four-Port Cholecystectomy in Children
por: Seifarth, Federico G., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Single-Port versus Multiple-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
por: Fahmy, Omar, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Single-Port vs. Conventional Multi-Port Laparoscopic Lymph Node Biopsy
por: Casaccia, Marco, et al.
Publicado: (2020)