Cargando…

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Conservative Treatment With Trunk Stabilization Exercise to Standard Hip Muscle Exercise for Treating Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of conservative management of women with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) using trunk stabilization. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial (level of evidence: I). SUBJECTS: Twenty FAI female patients who met the inclusion FAI criteria. METHODS: A prospective, random...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aoyama, Michihisa, Ohnishi, Yasuo, Utsunomiya, Hajime, Kanezaki, Shiho, Takeuchi, Hiroki, Watanuki, Makoto, Matsuda, Dean K., Uchida, Soshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31241527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000000516
_version_ 1783433093199167488
author Aoyama, Michihisa
Ohnishi, Yasuo
Utsunomiya, Hajime
Kanezaki, Shiho
Takeuchi, Hiroki
Watanuki, Makoto
Matsuda, Dean K.
Uchida, Soshi
author_facet Aoyama, Michihisa
Ohnishi, Yasuo
Utsunomiya, Hajime
Kanezaki, Shiho
Takeuchi, Hiroki
Watanuki, Makoto
Matsuda, Dean K.
Uchida, Soshi
author_sort Aoyama, Michihisa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of conservative management of women with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) using trunk stabilization. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial (level of evidence: I). SUBJECTS: Twenty FAI female patients who met the inclusion FAI criteria. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled study was performed on 20 female patients with symptomatic FAI comprising 2 groups (10 hips in trunk stabilization exercise group vs 10 hips in control group). We evaluated hip range of motion, isometric muscle strength using a handheld dynamometer (μ-TasMF-01; Anima, Co), and patient-reported outcome measures, including modified Harris hip score, Vail hip score, and international hip outcome tool 12 (iHOT12) before and at 4 weeks and 8 weeks after the intervention. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in the range of motion of hip flexion in the trunk training group detected as early as 4 weeks after the intervention compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Hip abductor strength significantly improved in the trunk training group at 4 weeks after the intervention, whereas it did not improve in the control group (P < 0.05). Vail hip score and iHOT12 were significantly increased at 8 weeks after the intervention in the trunk training group compared with the control group (iHOT12: 78.7 ± 22.4 vs 53.0 ± 22.3; P < 0.01, Vail hip score: 81.6 ± 18.5 vs 61.1 ± 11.6; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the modified Harris hip score between both the groups at 4 and 8 weeks after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of trunk stabilization exercise to a typical hip rehabilitation protocol improves short-term clinical outcomes and may augment nonoperative and postoperative rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6613832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66138322019-07-22 A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Conservative Treatment With Trunk Stabilization Exercise to Standard Hip Muscle Exercise for Treating Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Pilot Study Aoyama, Michihisa Ohnishi, Yasuo Utsunomiya, Hajime Kanezaki, Shiho Takeuchi, Hiroki Watanuki, Makoto Matsuda, Dean K. Uchida, Soshi Clin J Sport Med Original Research OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of conservative management of women with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) using trunk stabilization. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial (level of evidence: I). SUBJECTS: Twenty FAI female patients who met the inclusion FAI criteria. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled study was performed on 20 female patients with symptomatic FAI comprising 2 groups (10 hips in trunk stabilization exercise group vs 10 hips in control group). We evaluated hip range of motion, isometric muscle strength using a handheld dynamometer (μ-TasMF-01; Anima, Co), and patient-reported outcome measures, including modified Harris hip score, Vail hip score, and international hip outcome tool 12 (iHOT12) before and at 4 weeks and 8 weeks after the intervention. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in the range of motion of hip flexion in the trunk training group detected as early as 4 weeks after the intervention compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Hip abductor strength significantly improved in the trunk training group at 4 weeks after the intervention, whereas it did not improve in the control group (P < 0.05). Vail hip score and iHOT12 were significantly increased at 8 weeks after the intervention in the trunk training group compared with the control group (iHOT12: 78.7 ± 22.4 vs 53.0 ± 22.3; P < 0.01, Vail hip score: 81.6 ± 18.5 vs 61.1 ± 11.6; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the modified Harris hip score between both the groups at 4 and 8 weeks after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of trunk stabilization exercise to a typical hip rehabilitation protocol improves short-term clinical outcomes and may augment nonoperative and postoperative rehabilitation. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine 2019-07 2019-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6613832/ /pubmed/31241527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000000516 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Research
Aoyama, Michihisa
Ohnishi, Yasuo
Utsunomiya, Hajime
Kanezaki, Shiho
Takeuchi, Hiroki
Watanuki, Makoto
Matsuda, Dean K.
Uchida, Soshi
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Conservative Treatment With Trunk Stabilization Exercise to Standard Hip Muscle Exercise for Treating Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Pilot Study
title A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Conservative Treatment With Trunk Stabilization Exercise to Standard Hip Muscle Exercise for Treating Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Pilot Study
title_full A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Conservative Treatment With Trunk Stabilization Exercise to Standard Hip Muscle Exercise for Treating Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Conservative Treatment With Trunk Stabilization Exercise to Standard Hip Muscle Exercise for Treating Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Conservative Treatment With Trunk Stabilization Exercise to Standard Hip Muscle Exercise for Treating Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Pilot Study
title_short A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Conservative Treatment With Trunk Stabilization Exercise to Standard Hip Muscle Exercise for Treating Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Pilot Study
title_sort prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing conservative treatment with trunk stabilization exercise to standard hip muscle exercise for treating femoroacetabular impingement: a pilot study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31241527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000000516
work_keys_str_mv AT aoyamamichihisa aprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativetreatmentwithtrunkstabilizationexercisetostandardhipmuscleexercisefortreatingfemoroacetabularimpingementapilotstudy
AT ohnishiyasuo aprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativetreatmentwithtrunkstabilizationexercisetostandardhipmuscleexercisefortreatingfemoroacetabularimpingementapilotstudy
AT utsunomiyahajime aprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativetreatmentwithtrunkstabilizationexercisetostandardhipmuscleexercisefortreatingfemoroacetabularimpingementapilotstudy
AT kanezakishiho aprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativetreatmentwithtrunkstabilizationexercisetostandardhipmuscleexercisefortreatingfemoroacetabularimpingementapilotstudy
AT takeuchihiroki aprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativetreatmentwithtrunkstabilizationexercisetostandardhipmuscleexercisefortreatingfemoroacetabularimpingementapilotstudy
AT watanukimakoto aprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativetreatmentwithtrunkstabilizationexercisetostandardhipmuscleexercisefortreatingfemoroacetabularimpingementapilotstudy
AT matsudadeank aprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativetreatmentwithtrunkstabilizationexercisetostandardhipmuscleexercisefortreatingfemoroacetabularimpingementapilotstudy
AT uchidasoshi aprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativetreatmentwithtrunkstabilizationexercisetostandardhipmuscleexercisefortreatingfemoroacetabularimpingementapilotstudy
AT aoyamamichihisa prospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativetreatmentwithtrunkstabilizationexercisetostandardhipmuscleexercisefortreatingfemoroacetabularimpingementapilotstudy
AT ohnishiyasuo prospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativetreatmentwithtrunkstabilizationexercisetostandardhipmuscleexercisefortreatingfemoroacetabularimpingementapilotstudy
AT utsunomiyahajime prospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativetreatmentwithtrunkstabilizationexercisetostandardhipmuscleexercisefortreatingfemoroacetabularimpingementapilotstudy
AT kanezakishiho prospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativetreatmentwithtrunkstabilizationexercisetostandardhipmuscleexercisefortreatingfemoroacetabularimpingementapilotstudy
AT takeuchihiroki prospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativetreatmentwithtrunkstabilizationexercisetostandardhipmuscleexercisefortreatingfemoroacetabularimpingementapilotstudy
AT watanukimakoto prospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativetreatmentwithtrunkstabilizationexercisetostandardhipmuscleexercisefortreatingfemoroacetabularimpingementapilotstudy
AT matsudadeank prospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativetreatmentwithtrunkstabilizationexercisetostandardhipmuscleexercisefortreatingfemoroacetabularimpingementapilotstudy
AT uchidasoshi prospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingconservativetreatmentwithtrunkstabilizationexercisetostandardhipmuscleexercisefortreatingfemoroacetabularimpingementapilotstudy