Cargando…

The Effect of Workers’ Compensation Status on the Patient Experience

BACKGROUND: Rating the patient experience is an increasingly important component of value-based health care. Generation of lower ratings on validated functional assessments by patients with Workers’ Compensation is well known; however, the relationship between Workers’ Compensation status and patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Compton, Jocelyn, Glass, Natalie, Fowler, Timothy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31334458
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00003
_version_ 1783433097648275456
author Compton, Jocelyn
Glass, Natalie
Fowler, Timothy
author_facet Compton, Jocelyn
Glass, Natalie
Fowler, Timothy
author_sort Compton, Jocelyn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rating the patient experience is an increasingly important component of value-based health care. Generation of lower ratings on validated functional assessments by patients with Workers’ Compensation is well known; however, the relationship between Workers’ Compensation status and patient satisfaction is poorly described in orthopaedic patient populations. METHODS: All orthopaedic outpatient patient satisfaction surveys (Press Ganey) generated over an 18-month period at a U.S. academic tertiary care center were included in this study. Data with regard to the primary payer, demographic characteristics, orthopaedic subspecialty, and planned surgical interventions with the provider for whom the survey was completed were analyzed in conjunction with patient satisfaction data. RESULTS: During the study period, 3,720 consecutive patient satisfaction surveys were generated, and 244 surveys were generated by 215 patients with Workers’ Compensation. Satisfied patients with Workers’ Compensation were more likely to be male (p = 0.0007), to have higher mental health self-assessments (p = 0.004), and to be scheduled for surgical intervention (p = 0.03). Scheduling a surgical procedure was independently associated with improved patient satisfaction, whereas Workers’ Compensation status was independently associated with dissatisfaction when adjusting for sex, language, race, and marital status. Across all patient satisfaction domains, patients with Workers’ Compensation gave significantly lower scores (p < 0.05) compared with all other patients. Patients with Workers’ Compensation were more likely to rate their overall health as lower compared with other patients (p < 0.0001). Patients with Workers’ Compensation were more likely to give lower ratings to providers on a 1-to-10 scale (p < 0.0001) and were less likely to recommend the practice to others (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Workers’ Compensation status is a non-modifiable independent predictor of dissatisfaction with health care compared with other primary payer groups. Further research is warranted to understand the factors influencing patient satisfaction ratings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6613855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66138552019-07-22 The Effect of Workers’ Compensation Status on the Patient Experience Compton, Jocelyn Glass, Natalie Fowler, Timothy JB JS Open Access Scientific Articles BACKGROUND: Rating the patient experience is an increasingly important component of value-based health care. Generation of lower ratings on validated functional assessments by patients with Workers’ Compensation is well known; however, the relationship between Workers’ Compensation status and patient satisfaction is poorly described in orthopaedic patient populations. METHODS: All orthopaedic outpatient patient satisfaction surveys (Press Ganey) generated over an 18-month period at a U.S. academic tertiary care center were included in this study. Data with regard to the primary payer, demographic characteristics, orthopaedic subspecialty, and planned surgical interventions with the provider for whom the survey was completed were analyzed in conjunction with patient satisfaction data. RESULTS: During the study period, 3,720 consecutive patient satisfaction surveys were generated, and 244 surveys were generated by 215 patients with Workers’ Compensation. Satisfied patients with Workers’ Compensation were more likely to be male (p = 0.0007), to have higher mental health self-assessments (p = 0.004), and to be scheduled for surgical intervention (p = 0.03). Scheduling a surgical procedure was independently associated with improved patient satisfaction, whereas Workers’ Compensation status was independently associated with dissatisfaction when adjusting for sex, language, race, and marital status. Across all patient satisfaction domains, patients with Workers’ Compensation gave significantly lower scores (p < 0.05) compared with all other patients. Patients with Workers’ Compensation were more likely to rate their overall health as lower compared with other patients (p < 0.0001). Patients with Workers’ Compensation were more likely to give lower ratings to providers on a 1-to-10 scale (p < 0.0001) and were less likely to recommend the practice to others (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Workers’ Compensation status is a non-modifiable independent predictor of dissatisfaction with health care compared with other primary payer groups. Further research is warranted to understand the factors influencing patient satisfaction ratings. Wolters Kluwer 2019-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6613855/ /pubmed/31334458 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00003 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Scientific Articles
Compton, Jocelyn
Glass, Natalie
Fowler, Timothy
The Effect of Workers’ Compensation Status on the Patient Experience
title The Effect of Workers’ Compensation Status on the Patient Experience
title_full The Effect of Workers’ Compensation Status on the Patient Experience
title_fullStr The Effect of Workers’ Compensation Status on the Patient Experience
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Workers’ Compensation Status on the Patient Experience
title_short The Effect of Workers’ Compensation Status on the Patient Experience
title_sort effect of workers’ compensation status on the patient experience
topic Scientific Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31334458
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00003
work_keys_str_mv AT comptonjocelyn theeffectofworkerscompensationstatusonthepatientexperience
AT glassnatalie theeffectofworkerscompensationstatusonthepatientexperience
AT fowlertimothy theeffectofworkerscompensationstatusonthepatientexperience
AT comptonjocelyn effectofworkerscompensationstatusonthepatientexperience
AT glassnatalie effectofworkerscompensationstatusonthepatientexperience
AT fowlertimothy effectofworkerscompensationstatusonthepatientexperience