Cargando…

Assessing Organizational Supports for Evidence-Based Decision Making in Local Public Health Departments in the United States: Development and Psychometric Properties of a New Measure

CONTEXT: Fostering evidence-based decision making (EBDM) within local public health departments and among local health department (LHD) practitioners is crucial for the successful translation of research into public health practice to prevent and control chronic disease. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazzucca, Stephanie, Parks, Renee G., Tabak, Rachel G., Allen, Peg, Dobbins, Maureen, Stamatakis, Katherine A., Brownson, Ross C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6614014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31348160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000952
_version_ 1783433107172491264
author Mazzucca, Stephanie
Parks, Renee G.
Tabak, Rachel G.
Allen, Peg
Dobbins, Maureen
Stamatakis, Katherine A.
Brownson, Ross C.
author_facet Mazzucca, Stephanie
Parks, Renee G.
Tabak, Rachel G.
Allen, Peg
Dobbins, Maureen
Stamatakis, Katherine A.
Brownson, Ross C.
author_sort Mazzucca, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Fostering evidence-based decision making (EBDM) within local public health departments and among local health department (LHD) practitioners is crucial for the successful translation of research into public health practice to prevent and control chronic disease. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify organizational supports for EBDM within LHDs and determine psychometric properties of a measure of organizational supports for EBDM in LHDs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, observation study. SETTING: Local public health departments in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Local health department practitioners (N = 376) across the United States participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Local health department practitioners completed a survey containing 27 items about organizational supports for EBDM. Most items were adapted from previously developed surveys, and input from researchers and practitioners guided survey development. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test and refine the psychometric properties of the measure. RESULTS: The final solution included 6 factors of 22 items: awareness of EBDM (3 items), capacity for EBDM (7 items), resources availability (3 items), evaluation capacity (3 items), EBDM climate cultivation (3 items), and partnerships to support EBDM (3 items). This factor solution achieved acceptable fit (eg, Comparative Fit Index = 0.965). Logistic regression models showed positive relationships between the 6 factors and the number of evidence-based interventions delivered. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified important organizational supports for EBDM within LHDs. Results of this study can be used to understand and enhance organizational processes and structures to support EBDM to improve LHD performance and population health. Strong measures are important for understanding how LHDs support EBDM, evaluating interventions to improve LHD capacity, and to guide programmatic and policy efforts within LHDs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6614014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66140142019-09-16 Assessing Organizational Supports for Evidence-Based Decision Making in Local Public Health Departments in the United States: Development and Psychometric Properties of a New Measure Mazzucca, Stephanie Parks, Renee G. Tabak, Rachel G. Allen, Peg Dobbins, Maureen Stamatakis, Katherine A. Brownson, Ross C. J Public Health Manag Pract Research Reports CONTEXT: Fostering evidence-based decision making (EBDM) within local public health departments and among local health department (LHD) practitioners is crucial for the successful translation of research into public health practice to prevent and control chronic disease. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify organizational supports for EBDM within LHDs and determine psychometric properties of a measure of organizational supports for EBDM in LHDs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, observation study. SETTING: Local public health departments in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Local health department practitioners (N = 376) across the United States participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Local health department practitioners completed a survey containing 27 items about organizational supports for EBDM. Most items were adapted from previously developed surveys, and input from researchers and practitioners guided survey development. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test and refine the psychometric properties of the measure. RESULTS: The final solution included 6 factors of 22 items: awareness of EBDM (3 items), capacity for EBDM (7 items), resources availability (3 items), evaluation capacity (3 items), EBDM climate cultivation (3 items), and partnerships to support EBDM (3 items). This factor solution achieved acceptable fit (eg, Comparative Fit Index = 0.965). Logistic regression models showed positive relationships between the 6 factors and the number of evidence-based interventions delivered. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified important organizational supports for EBDM within LHDs. Results of this study can be used to understand and enhance organizational processes and structures to support EBDM to improve LHD performance and population health. Strong measures are important for understanding how LHDs support EBDM, evaluating interventions to improve LHD capacity, and to guide programmatic and policy efforts within LHDs. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2019-09 2019-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6614014/ /pubmed/31348160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000952 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Research Reports
Mazzucca, Stephanie
Parks, Renee G.
Tabak, Rachel G.
Allen, Peg
Dobbins, Maureen
Stamatakis, Katherine A.
Brownson, Ross C.
Assessing Organizational Supports for Evidence-Based Decision Making in Local Public Health Departments in the United States: Development and Psychometric Properties of a New Measure
title Assessing Organizational Supports for Evidence-Based Decision Making in Local Public Health Departments in the United States: Development and Psychometric Properties of a New Measure
title_full Assessing Organizational Supports for Evidence-Based Decision Making in Local Public Health Departments in the United States: Development and Psychometric Properties of a New Measure
title_fullStr Assessing Organizational Supports for Evidence-Based Decision Making in Local Public Health Departments in the United States: Development and Psychometric Properties of a New Measure
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Organizational Supports for Evidence-Based Decision Making in Local Public Health Departments in the United States: Development and Psychometric Properties of a New Measure
title_short Assessing Organizational Supports for Evidence-Based Decision Making in Local Public Health Departments in the United States: Development and Psychometric Properties of a New Measure
title_sort assessing organizational supports for evidence-based decision making in local public health departments in the united states: development and psychometric properties of a new measure
topic Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6614014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31348160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000952
work_keys_str_mv AT mazzuccastephanie assessingorganizationalsupportsforevidencebaseddecisionmakinginlocalpublichealthdepartmentsintheunitedstatesdevelopmentandpsychometricpropertiesofanewmeasure
AT parksreneeg assessingorganizationalsupportsforevidencebaseddecisionmakinginlocalpublichealthdepartmentsintheunitedstatesdevelopmentandpsychometricpropertiesofanewmeasure
AT tabakrachelg assessingorganizationalsupportsforevidencebaseddecisionmakinginlocalpublichealthdepartmentsintheunitedstatesdevelopmentandpsychometricpropertiesofanewmeasure
AT allenpeg assessingorganizationalsupportsforevidencebaseddecisionmakinginlocalpublichealthdepartmentsintheunitedstatesdevelopmentandpsychometricpropertiesofanewmeasure
AT dobbinsmaureen assessingorganizationalsupportsforevidencebaseddecisionmakinginlocalpublichealthdepartmentsintheunitedstatesdevelopmentandpsychometricpropertiesofanewmeasure
AT stamatakiskatherinea assessingorganizationalsupportsforevidencebaseddecisionmakinginlocalpublichealthdepartmentsintheunitedstatesdevelopmentandpsychometricpropertiesofanewmeasure
AT brownsonrossc assessingorganizationalsupportsforevidencebaseddecisionmakinginlocalpublichealthdepartmentsintheunitedstatesdevelopmentandpsychometricpropertiesofanewmeasure