Cargando…

IDH Mutation Analysis in Glioma Patients by CADMA Compared with SNaPshot Assay and two Immunohistochemical Methods

Mutations in IDH1/2 genes are a marker of good prognosis for glioma patients, associated with low grade gliomas and secondary glioblastomas. Immunohistochemistry and Sanger sequencing are current standards for IDH1/2 genotyping while many other methods exist. The aim of this study was to validate Co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Urbanovska, Irena, Megova, Magdalena Houdova, Dwight, Zachary, Kalita, Ondrej, Uvirova, Magdalena, Simova, Jarmila, Tuckova, Lucie, Buzrla, Petr, Palecek, Tomas, Hajduch, Marian, Dvorackova, Jana, Drabek, Jiri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6614140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29556922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12253-018-0413-9
_version_ 1783433132474630144
author Urbanovska, Irena
Megova, Magdalena Houdova
Dwight, Zachary
Kalita, Ondrej
Uvirova, Magdalena
Simova, Jarmila
Tuckova, Lucie
Buzrla, Petr
Palecek, Tomas
Hajduch, Marian
Dvorackova, Jana
Drabek, Jiri
author_facet Urbanovska, Irena
Megova, Magdalena Houdova
Dwight, Zachary
Kalita, Ondrej
Uvirova, Magdalena
Simova, Jarmila
Tuckova, Lucie
Buzrla, Petr
Palecek, Tomas
Hajduch, Marian
Dvorackova, Jana
Drabek, Jiri
author_sort Urbanovska, Irena
collection PubMed
description Mutations in IDH1/2 genes are a marker of good prognosis for glioma patients, associated with low grade gliomas and secondary glioblastomas. Immunohistochemistry and Sanger sequencing are current standards for IDH1/2 genotyping while many other methods exist. The aim of this study was to validate Competitive amplification of differentially melting amplicons (CADMA) PCR for IDH genotyping by comparison with SNaPshot assay and two immunohistochemical methods. In our study, 87 glioma patients (46 from Olomouc and 41 from Ostrava) were analyzed. IDH1/2 mutations in native bioptical samples were analyzed at DNA level by CADMA and SNaPshot while IDH1 mutations in FFPE samples were analyzed at protein level by two IHC methods. CADMA PCR sensitivity for IDH1 was 96.4% and specificity 100% for 86 concluded samples. SNaPshot assay sensitivity was 92.9% and specificity of 100% for 85 concluded samples. IHC in the laboratory no. 2 reached sensitivity 85.7% and specificity 100% for 86 concluded samples. IHC in the laboratory no. 4 reached sensitivity of 96.4% and specificity of 79.7% in 74 concluded samples. Only one IDH2 mutation was found by SNaPshot while CADMA yielded false negative result. In conclusion, CADMA is a valid method for IDH1 p.(R132H) testing with higher sensitivity than SNaPshot assay. Also, molecular genetic methods of IDH1 testing from native samples were more robust than IHC from FFPE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6614140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66141402019-07-28 IDH Mutation Analysis in Glioma Patients by CADMA Compared with SNaPshot Assay and two Immunohistochemical Methods Urbanovska, Irena Megova, Magdalena Houdova Dwight, Zachary Kalita, Ondrej Uvirova, Magdalena Simova, Jarmila Tuckova, Lucie Buzrla, Petr Palecek, Tomas Hajduch, Marian Dvorackova, Jana Drabek, Jiri Pathol Oncol Res Original Article Mutations in IDH1/2 genes are a marker of good prognosis for glioma patients, associated with low grade gliomas and secondary glioblastomas. Immunohistochemistry and Sanger sequencing are current standards for IDH1/2 genotyping while many other methods exist. The aim of this study was to validate Competitive amplification of differentially melting amplicons (CADMA) PCR for IDH genotyping by comparison with SNaPshot assay and two immunohistochemical methods. In our study, 87 glioma patients (46 from Olomouc and 41 from Ostrava) were analyzed. IDH1/2 mutations in native bioptical samples were analyzed at DNA level by CADMA and SNaPshot while IDH1 mutations in FFPE samples were analyzed at protein level by two IHC methods. CADMA PCR sensitivity for IDH1 was 96.4% and specificity 100% for 86 concluded samples. SNaPshot assay sensitivity was 92.9% and specificity of 100% for 85 concluded samples. IHC in the laboratory no. 2 reached sensitivity 85.7% and specificity 100% for 86 concluded samples. IHC in the laboratory no. 4 reached sensitivity of 96.4% and specificity of 79.7% in 74 concluded samples. Only one IDH2 mutation was found by SNaPshot while CADMA yielded false negative result. In conclusion, CADMA is a valid method for IDH1 p.(R132H) testing with higher sensitivity than SNaPshot assay. Also, molecular genetic methods of IDH1 testing from native samples were more robust than IHC from FFPE. Springer Netherlands 2018-03-19 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6614140/ /pubmed/29556922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12253-018-0413-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Urbanovska, Irena
Megova, Magdalena Houdova
Dwight, Zachary
Kalita, Ondrej
Uvirova, Magdalena
Simova, Jarmila
Tuckova, Lucie
Buzrla, Petr
Palecek, Tomas
Hajduch, Marian
Dvorackova, Jana
Drabek, Jiri
IDH Mutation Analysis in Glioma Patients by CADMA Compared with SNaPshot Assay and two Immunohistochemical Methods
title IDH Mutation Analysis in Glioma Patients by CADMA Compared with SNaPshot Assay and two Immunohistochemical Methods
title_full IDH Mutation Analysis in Glioma Patients by CADMA Compared with SNaPshot Assay and two Immunohistochemical Methods
title_fullStr IDH Mutation Analysis in Glioma Patients by CADMA Compared with SNaPshot Assay and two Immunohistochemical Methods
title_full_unstemmed IDH Mutation Analysis in Glioma Patients by CADMA Compared with SNaPshot Assay and two Immunohistochemical Methods
title_short IDH Mutation Analysis in Glioma Patients by CADMA Compared with SNaPshot Assay and two Immunohistochemical Methods
title_sort idh mutation analysis in glioma patients by cadma compared with snapshot assay and two immunohistochemical methods
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6614140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29556922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12253-018-0413-9
work_keys_str_mv AT urbanovskairena idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods
AT megovamagdalenahoudova idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods
AT dwightzachary idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods
AT kalitaondrej idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods
AT uvirovamagdalena idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods
AT simovajarmila idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods
AT tuckovalucie idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods
AT buzrlapetr idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods
AT palecektomas idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods
AT hajduchmarian idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods
AT dvorackovajana idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods
AT drabekjiri idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods