Cargando…
IDH Mutation Analysis in Glioma Patients by CADMA Compared with SNaPshot Assay and two Immunohistochemical Methods
Mutations in IDH1/2 genes are a marker of good prognosis for glioma patients, associated with low grade gliomas and secondary glioblastomas. Immunohistochemistry and Sanger sequencing are current standards for IDH1/2 genotyping while many other methods exist. The aim of this study was to validate Co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6614140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29556922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12253-018-0413-9 |
_version_ | 1783433132474630144 |
---|---|
author | Urbanovska, Irena Megova, Magdalena Houdova Dwight, Zachary Kalita, Ondrej Uvirova, Magdalena Simova, Jarmila Tuckova, Lucie Buzrla, Petr Palecek, Tomas Hajduch, Marian Dvorackova, Jana Drabek, Jiri |
author_facet | Urbanovska, Irena Megova, Magdalena Houdova Dwight, Zachary Kalita, Ondrej Uvirova, Magdalena Simova, Jarmila Tuckova, Lucie Buzrla, Petr Palecek, Tomas Hajduch, Marian Dvorackova, Jana Drabek, Jiri |
author_sort | Urbanovska, Irena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mutations in IDH1/2 genes are a marker of good prognosis for glioma patients, associated with low grade gliomas and secondary glioblastomas. Immunohistochemistry and Sanger sequencing are current standards for IDH1/2 genotyping while many other methods exist. The aim of this study was to validate Competitive amplification of differentially melting amplicons (CADMA) PCR for IDH genotyping by comparison with SNaPshot assay and two immunohistochemical methods. In our study, 87 glioma patients (46 from Olomouc and 41 from Ostrava) were analyzed. IDH1/2 mutations in native bioptical samples were analyzed at DNA level by CADMA and SNaPshot while IDH1 mutations in FFPE samples were analyzed at protein level by two IHC methods. CADMA PCR sensitivity for IDH1 was 96.4% and specificity 100% for 86 concluded samples. SNaPshot assay sensitivity was 92.9% and specificity of 100% for 85 concluded samples. IHC in the laboratory no. 2 reached sensitivity 85.7% and specificity 100% for 86 concluded samples. IHC in the laboratory no. 4 reached sensitivity of 96.4% and specificity of 79.7% in 74 concluded samples. Only one IDH2 mutation was found by SNaPshot while CADMA yielded false negative result. In conclusion, CADMA is a valid method for IDH1 p.(R132H) testing with higher sensitivity than SNaPshot assay. Also, molecular genetic methods of IDH1 testing from native samples were more robust than IHC from FFPE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6614140 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66141402019-07-28 IDH Mutation Analysis in Glioma Patients by CADMA Compared with SNaPshot Assay and two Immunohistochemical Methods Urbanovska, Irena Megova, Magdalena Houdova Dwight, Zachary Kalita, Ondrej Uvirova, Magdalena Simova, Jarmila Tuckova, Lucie Buzrla, Petr Palecek, Tomas Hajduch, Marian Dvorackova, Jana Drabek, Jiri Pathol Oncol Res Original Article Mutations in IDH1/2 genes are a marker of good prognosis for glioma patients, associated with low grade gliomas and secondary glioblastomas. Immunohistochemistry and Sanger sequencing are current standards for IDH1/2 genotyping while many other methods exist. The aim of this study was to validate Competitive amplification of differentially melting amplicons (CADMA) PCR for IDH genotyping by comparison with SNaPshot assay and two immunohistochemical methods. In our study, 87 glioma patients (46 from Olomouc and 41 from Ostrava) were analyzed. IDH1/2 mutations in native bioptical samples were analyzed at DNA level by CADMA and SNaPshot while IDH1 mutations in FFPE samples were analyzed at protein level by two IHC methods. CADMA PCR sensitivity for IDH1 was 96.4% and specificity 100% for 86 concluded samples. SNaPshot assay sensitivity was 92.9% and specificity of 100% for 85 concluded samples. IHC in the laboratory no. 2 reached sensitivity 85.7% and specificity 100% for 86 concluded samples. IHC in the laboratory no. 4 reached sensitivity of 96.4% and specificity of 79.7% in 74 concluded samples. Only one IDH2 mutation was found by SNaPshot while CADMA yielded false negative result. In conclusion, CADMA is a valid method for IDH1 p.(R132H) testing with higher sensitivity than SNaPshot assay. Also, molecular genetic methods of IDH1 testing from native samples were more robust than IHC from FFPE. Springer Netherlands 2018-03-19 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6614140/ /pubmed/29556922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12253-018-0413-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Urbanovska, Irena Megova, Magdalena Houdova Dwight, Zachary Kalita, Ondrej Uvirova, Magdalena Simova, Jarmila Tuckova, Lucie Buzrla, Petr Palecek, Tomas Hajduch, Marian Dvorackova, Jana Drabek, Jiri IDH Mutation Analysis in Glioma Patients by CADMA Compared with SNaPshot Assay and two Immunohistochemical Methods |
title | IDH Mutation Analysis in Glioma Patients by CADMA Compared with SNaPshot Assay and two Immunohistochemical Methods |
title_full | IDH Mutation Analysis in Glioma Patients by CADMA Compared with SNaPshot Assay and two Immunohistochemical Methods |
title_fullStr | IDH Mutation Analysis in Glioma Patients by CADMA Compared with SNaPshot Assay and two Immunohistochemical Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | IDH Mutation Analysis in Glioma Patients by CADMA Compared with SNaPshot Assay and two Immunohistochemical Methods |
title_short | IDH Mutation Analysis in Glioma Patients by CADMA Compared with SNaPshot Assay and two Immunohistochemical Methods |
title_sort | idh mutation analysis in glioma patients by cadma compared with snapshot assay and two immunohistochemical methods |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6614140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29556922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12253-018-0413-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT urbanovskairena idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods AT megovamagdalenahoudova idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods AT dwightzachary idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods AT kalitaondrej idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods AT uvirovamagdalena idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods AT simovajarmila idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods AT tuckovalucie idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods AT buzrlapetr idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods AT palecektomas idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods AT hajduchmarian idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods AT dvorackovajana idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods AT drabekjiri idhmutationanalysisingliomapatientsbycadmacomparedwithsnapshotassayandtwoimmunohistochemicalmethods |