Cargando…

Visual and kinesthetic modes affect motor imagery classification in untrained subjects

The understanding of neurophysiological mechanisms responsible for motor imagery (MI) is essential for the development of brain-computer interfaces (BCI) and bioprosthetics. Our magnetoencephalographic (MEG) experiments with voluntary participants confirm the existence of two types of motor imagery,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chholak, Parth, Niso, Guiomar, Maksimenko, Vladimir A., Kurkin, Semen A., Frolov, Nikita S., Pitsik, Elena N., Hramov, Alexander E., Pisarchik, Alexander N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6614413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31285468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46310-9
_version_ 1783433178502922240
author Chholak, Parth
Niso, Guiomar
Maksimenko, Vladimir A.
Kurkin, Semen A.
Frolov, Nikita S.
Pitsik, Elena N.
Hramov, Alexander E.
Pisarchik, Alexander N.
author_facet Chholak, Parth
Niso, Guiomar
Maksimenko, Vladimir A.
Kurkin, Semen A.
Frolov, Nikita S.
Pitsik, Elena N.
Hramov, Alexander E.
Pisarchik, Alexander N.
author_sort Chholak, Parth
collection PubMed
description The understanding of neurophysiological mechanisms responsible for motor imagery (MI) is essential for the development of brain-computer interfaces (BCI) and bioprosthetics. Our magnetoencephalographic (MEG) experiments with voluntary participants confirm the existence of two types of motor imagery, kinesthetic imagery (KI) and visual imagery (VI), distinguished by activation and inhibition of different brain areas in motor-related α- and β-frequency regions. Although the brain activity corresponding to MI is usually observed in specially trained subjects or athletes, we show that it is also possible to identify particular features of MI in untrained subjects. Similar to real movement, KI implies muscular sensation when performing an imaginary moving action that leads to event-related desynchronization (ERD) of motor-associated brain rhythms. By contrast, VI refers to visualization of the corresponding action that results in event-related synchronization (ERS) of α- and β-wave activity. A notable difference between KI and VI groups occurs in the frontal brain area. In particular, the analysis of evoked responses shows that in all KI subjects the activity in the frontal cortex is suppressed during MI, while in the VI subjects the frontal cortex is always active. The accuracy in classification of left-arm and right-arm MI using artificial intelligence is similar for KI and VI. Since untrained subjects usually demonstrate the VI imagery mode, the possibility to increase the accuracy for VI is in demand for BCIs. The application of artificial neural networks allows us to classify MI in raising right and left arms with average accuracy of 70% for both KI and VI using appropriate filtration of input signals. The same average accuracy is achieved by optimizing MEG channels and reducing their number to only 13.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6614413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66144132019-07-17 Visual and kinesthetic modes affect motor imagery classification in untrained subjects Chholak, Parth Niso, Guiomar Maksimenko, Vladimir A. Kurkin, Semen A. Frolov, Nikita S. Pitsik, Elena N. Hramov, Alexander E. Pisarchik, Alexander N. Sci Rep Article The understanding of neurophysiological mechanisms responsible for motor imagery (MI) is essential for the development of brain-computer interfaces (BCI) and bioprosthetics. Our magnetoencephalographic (MEG) experiments with voluntary participants confirm the existence of two types of motor imagery, kinesthetic imagery (KI) and visual imagery (VI), distinguished by activation and inhibition of different brain areas in motor-related α- and β-frequency regions. Although the brain activity corresponding to MI is usually observed in specially trained subjects or athletes, we show that it is also possible to identify particular features of MI in untrained subjects. Similar to real movement, KI implies muscular sensation when performing an imaginary moving action that leads to event-related desynchronization (ERD) of motor-associated brain rhythms. By contrast, VI refers to visualization of the corresponding action that results in event-related synchronization (ERS) of α- and β-wave activity. A notable difference between KI and VI groups occurs in the frontal brain area. In particular, the analysis of evoked responses shows that in all KI subjects the activity in the frontal cortex is suppressed during MI, while in the VI subjects the frontal cortex is always active. The accuracy in classification of left-arm and right-arm MI using artificial intelligence is similar for KI and VI. Since untrained subjects usually demonstrate the VI imagery mode, the possibility to increase the accuracy for VI is in demand for BCIs. The application of artificial neural networks allows us to classify MI in raising right and left arms with average accuracy of 70% for both KI and VI using appropriate filtration of input signals. The same average accuracy is achieved by optimizing MEG channels and reducing their number to only 13. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6614413/ /pubmed/31285468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46310-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Chholak, Parth
Niso, Guiomar
Maksimenko, Vladimir A.
Kurkin, Semen A.
Frolov, Nikita S.
Pitsik, Elena N.
Hramov, Alexander E.
Pisarchik, Alexander N.
Visual and kinesthetic modes affect motor imagery classification in untrained subjects
title Visual and kinesthetic modes affect motor imagery classification in untrained subjects
title_full Visual and kinesthetic modes affect motor imagery classification in untrained subjects
title_fullStr Visual and kinesthetic modes affect motor imagery classification in untrained subjects
title_full_unstemmed Visual and kinesthetic modes affect motor imagery classification in untrained subjects
title_short Visual and kinesthetic modes affect motor imagery classification in untrained subjects
title_sort visual and kinesthetic modes affect motor imagery classification in untrained subjects
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6614413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31285468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46310-9
work_keys_str_mv AT chholakparth visualandkinestheticmodesaffectmotorimageryclassificationinuntrainedsubjects
AT nisoguiomar visualandkinestheticmodesaffectmotorimageryclassificationinuntrainedsubjects
AT maksimenkovladimira visualandkinestheticmodesaffectmotorimageryclassificationinuntrainedsubjects
AT kurkinsemena visualandkinestheticmodesaffectmotorimageryclassificationinuntrainedsubjects
AT frolovnikitas visualandkinestheticmodesaffectmotorimageryclassificationinuntrainedsubjects
AT pitsikelenan visualandkinestheticmodesaffectmotorimageryclassificationinuntrainedsubjects
AT hramovalexandere visualandkinestheticmodesaffectmotorimageryclassificationinuntrainedsubjects
AT pisarchikalexandern visualandkinestheticmodesaffectmotorimageryclassificationinuntrainedsubjects