Cargando…

Comparison of biochars derived from different types of feedstock and their potential for heavy metal removal in multiple-metal solutions

Three different types of feedstocks and their biochars were used to remove Cr(III), Cd(II), Cu(II) and Pb(II) ions from a mixture of multiple heavy metals. The effect of the initial concentration of heavy metals in solution has been analysed, and kinetics modelling and a comparison of the adsorption...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, JingJing, Shen, Xin-Jie, Domene, Xavier, Alcañiz, Josep-Maria, Liao, Xing, Palet, Cristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6614460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31285499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46234-4
_version_ 1783433189487804416
author Zhao, JingJing
Shen, Xin-Jie
Domene, Xavier
Alcañiz, Josep-Maria
Liao, Xing
Palet, Cristina
author_facet Zhao, JingJing
Shen, Xin-Jie
Domene, Xavier
Alcañiz, Josep-Maria
Liao, Xing
Palet, Cristina
author_sort Zhao, JingJing
collection PubMed
description Three different types of feedstocks and their biochars were used to remove Cr(III), Cd(II), Cu(II) and Pb(II) ions from a mixture of multiple heavy metals. The effect of the initial concentration of heavy metals in solution has been analysed, and kinetics modelling and a comparison of the adsorption capacity of such materials have been performed to elucidate the possible adsorption mechanisms. The results show that the adsorption capacity is dependent on the type of feedstock and on the pyrolysis conditions. The adsorption capacity of the biomass types is ranked as follows: FO (from sewage sludge)>> LO > ZO (both from agriculture biomass waste)>> CO (from wood biomass waste). Biochars, which are the product of the pyrolysis of feedstocks, clearly improve the adsorption efficiency in the case of those derived from wood and agricultural biomasses. Complexation and cation exchange have been found to be the two main adsorption mechanisms in systems containing multiple heavy metals, with cation exchange being the most significant. The pore structure of biomass/biochar cannot be neglected when investigating the adsorption mechanism of each material. All the disposal biomasses presented here are good alternatives for heavy metal removal from wastewaters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6614460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66144602019-07-17 Comparison of biochars derived from different types of feedstock and their potential for heavy metal removal in multiple-metal solutions Zhao, JingJing Shen, Xin-Jie Domene, Xavier Alcañiz, Josep-Maria Liao, Xing Palet, Cristina Sci Rep Article Three different types of feedstocks and their biochars were used to remove Cr(III), Cd(II), Cu(II) and Pb(II) ions from a mixture of multiple heavy metals. The effect of the initial concentration of heavy metals in solution has been analysed, and kinetics modelling and a comparison of the adsorption capacity of such materials have been performed to elucidate the possible adsorption mechanisms. The results show that the adsorption capacity is dependent on the type of feedstock and on the pyrolysis conditions. The adsorption capacity of the biomass types is ranked as follows: FO (from sewage sludge)>> LO > ZO (both from agriculture biomass waste)>> CO (from wood biomass waste). Biochars, which are the product of the pyrolysis of feedstocks, clearly improve the adsorption efficiency in the case of those derived from wood and agricultural biomasses. Complexation and cation exchange have been found to be the two main adsorption mechanisms in systems containing multiple heavy metals, with cation exchange being the most significant. The pore structure of biomass/biochar cannot be neglected when investigating the adsorption mechanism of each material. All the disposal biomasses presented here are good alternatives for heavy metal removal from wastewaters. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6614460/ /pubmed/31285499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46234-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Zhao, JingJing
Shen, Xin-Jie
Domene, Xavier
Alcañiz, Josep-Maria
Liao, Xing
Palet, Cristina
Comparison of biochars derived from different types of feedstock and their potential for heavy metal removal in multiple-metal solutions
title Comparison of biochars derived from different types of feedstock and their potential for heavy metal removal in multiple-metal solutions
title_full Comparison of biochars derived from different types of feedstock and their potential for heavy metal removal in multiple-metal solutions
title_fullStr Comparison of biochars derived from different types of feedstock and their potential for heavy metal removal in multiple-metal solutions
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of biochars derived from different types of feedstock and their potential for heavy metal removal in multiple-metal solutions
title_short Comparison of biochars derived from different types of feedstock and their potential for heavy metal removal in multiple-metal solutions
title_sort comparison of biochars derived from different types of feedstock and their potential for heavy metal removal in multiple-metal solutions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6614460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31285499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46234-4
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaojingjing comparisonofbiocharsderivedfromdifferenttypesoffeedstockandtheirpotentialforheavymetalremovalinmultiplemetalsolutions
AT shenxinjie comparisonofbiocharsderivedfromdifferenttypesoffeedstockandtheirpotentialforheavymetalremovalinmultiplemetalsolutions
AT domenexavier comparisonofbiocharsderivedfromdifferenttypesoffeedstockandtheirpotentialforheavymetalremovalinmultiplemetalsolutions
AT alcanizjosepmaria comparisonofbiocharsderivedfromdifferenttypesoffeedstockandtheirpotentialforheavymetalremovalinmultiplemetalsolutions
AT liaoxing comparisonofbiocharsderivedfromdifferenttypesoffeedstockandtheirpotentialforheavymetalremovalinmultiplemetalsolutions
AT paletcristina comparisonofbiocharsderivedfromdifferenttypesoffeedstockandtheirpotentialforheavymetalremovalinmultiplemetalsolutions