Cargando…
Comparison of biochars derived from different types of feedstock and their potential for heavy metal removal in multiple-metal solutions
Three different types of feedstocks and their biochars were used to remove Cr(III), Cd(II), Cu(II) and Pb(II) ions from a mixture of multiple heavy metals. The effect of the initial concentration of heavy metals in solution has been analysed, and kinetics modelling and a comparison of the adsorption...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6614460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31285499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46234-4 |
_version_ | 1783433189487804416 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, JingJing Shen, Xin-Jie Domene, Xavier Alcañiz, Josep-Maria Liao, Xing Palet, Cristina |
author_facet | Zhao, JingJing Shen, Xin-Jie Domene, Xavier Alcañiz, Josep-Maria Liao, Xing Palet, Cristina |
author_sort | Zhao, JingJing |
collection | PubMed |
description | Three different types of feedstocks and their biochars were used to remove Cr(III), Cd(II), Cu(II) and Pb(II) ions from a mixture of multiple heavy metals. The effect of the initial concentration of heavy metals in solution has been analysed, and kinetics modelling and a comparison of the adsorption capacity of such materials have been performed to elucidate the possible adsorption mechanisms. The results show that the adsorption capacity is dependent on the type of feedstock and on the pyrolysis conditions. The adsorption capacity of the biomass types is ranked as follows: FO (from sewage sludge)>> LO > ZO (both from agriculture biomass waste)>> CO (from wood biomass waste). Biochars, which are the product of the pyrolysis of feedstocks, clearly improve the adsorption efficiency in the case of those derived from wood and agricultural biomasses. Complexation and cation exchange have been found to be the two main adsorption mechanisms in systems containing multiple heavy metals, with cation exchange being the most significant. The pore structure of biomass/biochar cannot be neglected when investigating the adsorption mechanism of each material. All the disposal biomasses presented here are good alternatives for heavy metal removal from wastewaters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6614460 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66144602019-07-17 Comparison of biochars derived from different types of feedstock and their potential for heavy metal removal in multiple-metal solutions Zhao, JingJing Shen, Xin-Jie Domene, Xavier Alcañiz, Josep-Maria Liao, Xing Palet, Cristina Sci Rep Article Three different types of feedstocks and their biochars were used to remove Cr(III), Cd(II), Cu(II) and Pb(II) ions from a mixture of multiple heavy metals. The effect of the initial concentration of heavy metals in solution has been analysed, and kinetics modelling and a comparison of the adsorption capacity of such materials have been performed to elucidate the possible adsorption mechanisms. The results show that the adsorption capacity is dependent on the type of feedstock and on the pyrolysis conditions. The adsorption capacity of the biomass types is ranked as follows: FO (from sewage sludge)>> LO > ZO (both from agriculture biomass waste)>> CO (from wood biomass waste). Biochars, which are the product of the pyrolysis of feedstocks, clearly improve the adsorption efficiency in the case of those derived from wood and agricultural biomasses. Complexation and cation exchange have been found to be the two main adsorption mechanisms in systems containing multiple heavy metals, with cation exchange being the most significant. The pore structure of biomass/biochar cannot be neglected when investigating the adsorption mechanism of each material. All the disposal biomasses presented here are good alternatives for heavy metal removal from wastewaters. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6614460/ /pubmed/31285499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46234-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Zhao, JingJing Shen, Xin-Jie Domene, Xavier Alcañiz, Josep-Maria Liao, Xing Palet, Cristina Comparison of biochars derived from different types of feedstock and their potential for heavy metal removal in multiple-metal solutions |
title | Comparison of biochars derived from different types of feedstock and their potential for heavy metal removal in multiple-metal solutions |
title_full | Comparison of biochars derived from different types of feedstock and their potential for heavy metal removal in multiple-metal solutions |
title_fullStr | Comparison of biochars derived from different types of feedstock and their potential for heavy metal removal in multiple-metal solutions |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of biochars derived from different types of feedstock and their potential for heavy metal removal in multiple-metal solutions |
title_short | Comparison of biochars derived from different types of feedstock and their potential for heavy metal removal in multiple-metal solutions |
title_sort | comparison of biochars derived from different types of feedstock and their potential for heavy metal removal in multiple-metal solutions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6614460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31285499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46234-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaojingjing comparisonofbiocharsderivedfromdifferenttypesoffeedstockandtheirpotentialforheavymetalremovalinmultiplemetalsolutions AT shenxinjie comparisonofbiocharsderivedfromdifferenttypesoffeedstockandtheirpotentialforheavymetalremovalinmultiplemetalsolutions AT domenexavier comparisonofbiocharsderivedfromdifferenttypesoffeedstockandtheirpotentialforheavymetalremovalinmultiplemetalsolutions AT alcanizjosepmaria comparisonofbiocharsderivedfromdifferenttypesoffeedstockandtheirpotentialforheavymetalremovalinmultiplemetalsolutions AT liaoxing comparisonofbiocharsderivedfromdifferenttypesoffeedstockandtheirpotentialforheavymetalremovalinmultiplemetalsolutions AT paletcristina comparisonofbiocharsderivedfromdifferenttypesoffeedstockandtheirpotentialforheavymetalremovalinmultiplemetalsolutions |