Cargando…
Use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
INTRODUCTION: Surgical implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) requires preparation of a deeper and larger pocket. Infection and bleeding complications are reported, particularly in patients requiring antiplatelet therapy (APT) or being on oral anticoagulation (O...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6614530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31334332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100390 |
_version_ | 1783433205179744256 |
---|---|
author | Kaya, Elif Siebermair, Johannes Azizy, Obayda Dobrev, Dobromir Rassaf, Tienush Wakili, Reza |
author_facet | Kaya, Elif Siebermair, Johannes Azizy, Obayda Dobrev, Dobromir Rassaf, Tienush Wakili, Reza |
author_sort | Kaya, Elif |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Surgical implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) requires preparation of a deeper and larger pocket. Infection and bleeding complications are reported, particularly in patients requiring antiplatelet therapy (APT) or being on oral anticoagulation (OAC), with rates up to 25%. The pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ has been reported to reduce bleeding complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a PEAK guided S-ICD implantation with respect to perioperative complications. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 36 consecutive patients (75% male; mean age 52.1 ± 14.4 years) undergoing S-ICD implantation. Periprocedural safety endpoints comprised major complications including pocket hematomas, wound infections, bleeding (BARC ≥2) or events requiring interventions. Patients were divided into three groups according to management of their anticoagulation: i.) APT, n = 15 (41.7%); ii.) OAC, n = 10 patients (27.8%); iii.) none (neither OAC nor APT), n = 11 (30.6%). Mean procedure duration was 33.1 ± 13.4 min. Mean length of hospital stay was 3.3 ± 2.1 days. Overall analysis showed no differences between the 3 groups with respect to major complications, major bleeding episodes or other procedural parameters, beside a trend towards more minor hematomas in the OAC group (OAC: 22.2% vs. APT: 11.4% vs. none: 9.1%; p = 0.15). CONCLUSION: The results of our pilot study suggest that intermuscular S-ICD implantation using PEAK is safe and potentially beneficial in patients receiving OAC or APT with respect to prevention of bleeding complications. These results support the rationale for large prospective controlled trials evaluating a beneficial effect of PEAK use in S-ICD implantation procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6614530 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66145302019-07-22 Use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator Kaya, Elif Siebermair, Johannes Azizy, Obayda Dobrev, Dobromir Rassaf, Tienush Wakili, Reza Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Surgical implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) requires preparation of a deeper and larger pocket. Infection and bleeding complications are reported, particularly in patients requiring antiplatelet therapy (APT) or being on oral anticoagulation (OAC), with rates up to 25%. The pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ has been reported to reduce bleeding complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a PEAK guided S-ICD implantation with respect to perioperative complications. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 36 consecutive patients (75% male; mean age 52.1 ± 14.4 years) undergoing S-ICD implantation. Periprocedural safety endpoints comprised major complications including pocket hematomas, wound infections, bleeding (BARC ≥2) or events requiring interventions. Patients were divided into three groups according to management of their anticoagulation: i.) APT, n = 15 (41.7%); ii.) OAC, n = 10 patients (27.8%); iii.) none (neither OAC nor APT), n = 11 (30.6%). Mean procedure duration was 33.1 ± 13.4 min. Mean length of hospital stay was 3.3 ± 2.1 days. Overall analysis showed no differences between the 3 groups with respect to major complications, major bleeding episodes or other procedural parameters, beside a trend towards more minor hematomas in the OAC group (OAC: 22.2% vs. APT: 11.4% vs. none: 9.1%; p = 0.15). CONCLUSION: The results of our pilot study suggest that intermuscular S-ICD implantation using PEAK is safe and potentially beneficial in patients receiving OAC or APT with respect to prevention of bleeding complications. These results support the rationale for large prospective controlled trials evaluating a beneficial effect of PEAK use in S-ICD implantation procedures. Elsevier 2019-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6614530/ /pubmed/31334332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100390 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Kaya, Elif Siebermair, Johannes Azizy, Obayda Dobrev, Dobromir Rassaf, Tienush Wakili, Reza Use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator |
title | Use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator |
title_full | Use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator |
title_fullStr | Use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator |
title_short | Use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator |
title_sort | use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (peak) plasmablade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6614530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31334332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100390 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kayaelif useofpulsedelectronavalancheknifepeakplasmabladeinpatientsundergoingimplantationofsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator AT siebermairjohannes useofpulsedelectronavalancheknifepeakplasmabladeinpatientsundergoingimplantationofsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator AT azizyobayda useofpulsedelectronavalancheknifepeakplasmabladeinpatientsundergoingimplantationofsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator AT dobrevdobromir useofpulsedelectronavalancheknifepeakplasmabladeinpatientsundergoingimplantationofsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator AT rassaftienush useofpulsedelectronavalancheknifepeakplasmabladeinpatientsundergoingimplantationofsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator AT wakilireza useofpulsedelectronavalancheknifepeakplasmabladeinpatientsundergoingimplantationofsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator |