Cargando…

Use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

INTRODUCTION: Surgical implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) requires preparation of a deeper and larger pocket. Infection and bleeding complications are reported, particularly in patients requiring antiplatelet therapy (APT) or being on oral anticoagulation (O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaya, Elif, Siebermair, Johannes, Azizy, Obayda, Dobrev, Dobromir, Rassaf, Tienush, Wakili, Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6614530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31334332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100390
_version_ 1783433205179744256
author Kaya, Elif
Siebermair, Johannes
Azizy, Obayda
Dobrev, Dobromir
Rassaf, Tienush
Wakili, Reza
author_facet Kaya, Elif
Siebermair, Johannes
Azizy, Obayda
Dobrev, Dobromir
Rassaf, Tienush
Wakili, Reza
author_sort Kaya, Elif
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Surgical implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) requires preparation of a deeper and larger pocket. Infection and bleeding complications are reported, particularly in patients requiring antiplatelet therapy (APT) or being on oral anticoagulation (OAC), with rates up to 25%. The pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ has been reported to reduce bleeding complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a PEAK guided S-ICD implantation with respect to perioperative complications. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 36 consecutive patients (75% male; mean age 52.1 ± 14.4 years) undergoing S-ICD implantation. Periprocedural safety endpoints comprised major complications including pocket hematomas, wound infections, bleeding (BARC ≥2) or events requiring interventions. Patients were divided into three groups according to management of their anticoagulation: i.) APT, n = 15 (41.7%); ii.) OAC, n = 10 patients (27.8%); iii.) none (neither OAC nor APT), n = 11 (30.6%). Mean procedure duration was 33.1 ± 13.4 min. Mean length of hospital stay was 3.3 ± 2.1 days. Overall analysis showed no differences between the 3 groups with respect to major complications, major bleeding episodes or other procedural parameters, beside a trend towards more minor hematomas in the OAC group (OAC: 22.2% vs. APT: 11.4% vs. none: 9.1%; p = 0.15). CONCLUSION: The results of our pilot study suggest that intermuscular S-ICD implantation using PEAK is safe and potentially beneficial in patients receiving OAC or APT with respect to prevention of bleeding complications. These results support the rationale for large prospective controlled trials evaluating a beneficial effect of PEAK use in S-ICD implantation procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6614530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66145302019-07-22 Use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator Kaya, Elif Siebermair, Johannes Azizy, Obayda Dobrev, Dobromir Rassaf, Tienush Wakili, Reza Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Surgical implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) requires preparation of a deeper and larger pocket. Infection and bleeding complications are reported, particularly in patients requiring antiplatelet therapy (APT) or being on oral anticoagulation (OAC), with rates up to 25%. The pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ has been reported to reduce bleeding complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a PEAK guided S-ICD implantation with respect to perioperative complications. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 36 consecutive patients (75% male; mean age 52.1 ± 14.4 years) undergoing S-ICD implantation. Periprocedural safety endpoints comprised major complications including pocket hematomas, wound infections, bleeding (BARC ≥2) or events requiring interventions. Patients were divided into three groups according to management of their anticoagulation: i.) APT, n = 15 (41.7%); ii.) OAC, n = 10 patients (27.8%); iii.) none (neither OAC nor APT), n = 11 (30.6%). Mean procedure duration was 33.1 ± 13.4 min. Mean length of hospital stay was 3.3 ± 2.1 days. Overall analysis showed no differences between the 3 groups with respect to major complications, major bleeding episodes or other procedural parameters, beside a trend towards more minor hematomas in the OAC group (OAC: 22.2% vs. APT: 11.4% vs. none: 9.1%; p = 0.15). CONCLUSION: The results of our pilot study suggest that intermuscular S-ICD implantation using PEAK is safe and potentially beneficial in patients receiving OAC or APT with respect to prevention of bleeding complications. These results support the rationale for large prospective controlled trials evaluating a beneficial effect of PEAK use in S-ICD implantation procedures. Elsevier 2019-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6614530/ /pubmed/31334332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100390 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kaya, Elif
Siebermair, Johannes
Azizy, Obayda
Dobrev, Dobromir
Rassaf, Tienush
Wakili, Reza
Use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
title Use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
title_full Use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
title_fullStr Use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
title_full_unstemmed Use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
title_short Use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
title_sort use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (peak) plasmablade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6614530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31334332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100390
work_keys_str_mv AT kayaelif useofpulsedelectronavalancheknifepeakplasmabladeinpatientsundergoingimplantationofsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT siebermairjohannes useofpulsedelectronavalancheknifepeakplasmabladeinpatientsundergoingimplantationofsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT azizyobayda useofpulsedelectronavalancheknifepeakplasmabladeinpatientsundergoingimplantationofsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT dobrevdobromir useofpulsedelectronavalancheknifepeakplasmabladeinpatientsundergoingimplantationofsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT rassaftienush useofpulsedelectronavalancheknifepeakplasmabladeinpatientsundergoingimplantationofsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT wakilireza useofpulsedelectronavalancheknifepeakplasmabladeinpatientsundergoingimplantationofsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator