Cargando…

Esophageal Perforation due to Anterior Cervical Spine Hardware Placement: Case Series

Context. This case series discusses surgical management of esophageal perforations that occurred following cervical spine hardware placement. Purpose. (1) Determine presenting symptoms of esophageal perforation after anterior cervical spine hardware placement. (2) Discuss surgical management of thes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Thomas S., Appelbaum, Eric N., Sheen, Derek, Han, Reintine, Wie, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6614980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31341480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7682654
_version_ 1783433277661511680
author Lee, Thomas S.
Appelbaum, Eric N.
Sheen, Derek
Han, Reintine
Wie, Benjamin
author_facet Lee, Thomas S.
Appelbaum, Eric N.
Sheen, Derek
Han, Reintine
Wie, Benjamin
author_sort Lee, Thomas S.
collection PubMed
description Context. This case series discusses surgical management of esophageal perforations that occurred following cervical spine hardware placement. Purpose. (1) Determine presenting symptoms of esophageal perforation after anterior cervical spine hardware placement. (2) Discuss surgical management of these resulting esophageal perforation complications. Design/Setting. Case series of six patients at a tertiary-care, academic medical center. Patient Sample. Six patients with pharyngoesophageal perforations following anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS). Outcome Measures. Date of ACSS, indication for ACSS, level of hardware, location of esophageal or pharyngeal injury, symptoms at presentation, surgical intervention, type of reconstruction flap, wound culture flora, and antibiotic choice. Methods. A retrospective review of patients with an esophageal or hypopharyngeal injury in the setting of prior ACSS managed by the otolaryngology service at a tertiary, academic center between January 2015 and January 2019. Results. Six patients who experienced pharyngoesophageal perforation following ACSS are included in this study. Range of presentation was two weeks to eight years following initial hardware placement. Five patients presented with an abscess and all had evidence of perforation on initial CT or esophagram. All patients underwent repair with a sternocleidomastoid flap with two patients eventually requiring an additional pectoralis myofascial flap for a persistent esophageal leak. Five patients eventually attained ability to tolerate oral nutrition. An algorithm detailing surgical reconstructive management is proposed. Conclusions. Esophageal perforations in the setting of prior ACSS are challenging clinical problems faced by otolaryngologists. Consideration should be given to early drainage of abscesses and spine surgery evaluation. Spinal hardware removal is recommended whenever possible. Utilization of a pedicled muscle flap reinforces primary closure and allows coverage of the vertebral bony defect. Nutrition, thyroid repletion, and culture-directed IV antibiotics are necessary to optimize esophageal perforation repair.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6614980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66149802019-07-24 Esophageal Perforation due to Anterior Cervical Spine Hardware Placement: Case Series Lee, Thomas S. Appelbaum, Eric N. Sheen, Derek Han, Reintine Wie, Benjamin Int J Otolaryngol Clinical Study Context. This case series discusses surgical management of esophageal perforations that occurred following cervical spine hardware placement. Purpose. (1) Determine presenting symptoms of esophageal perforation after anterior cervical spine hardware placement. (2) Discuss surgical management of these resulting esophageal perforation complications. Design/Setting. Case series of six patients at a tertiary-care, academic medical center. Patient Sample. Six patients with pharyngoesophageal perforations following anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS). Outcome Measures. Date of ACSS, indication for ACSS, level of hardware, location of esophageal or pharyngeal injury, symptoms at presentation, surgical intervention, type of reconstruction flap, wound culture flora, and antibiotic choice. Methods. A retrospective review of patients with an esophageal or hypopharyngeal injury in the setting of prior ACSS managed by the otolaryngology service at a tertiary, academic center between January 2015 and January 2019. Results. Six patients who experienced pharyngoesophageal perforation following ACSS are included in this study. Range of presentation was two weeks to eight years following initial hardware placement. Five patients presented with an abscess and all had evidence of perforation on initial CT or esophagram. All patients underwent repair with a sternocleidomastoid flap with two patients eventually requiring an additional pectoralis myofascial flap for a persistent esophageal leak. Five patients eventually attained ability to tolerate oral nutrition. An algorithm detailing surgical reconstructive management is proposed. Conclusions. Esophageal perforations in the setting of prior ACSS are challenging clinical problems faced by otolaryngologists. Consideration should be given to early drainage of abscesses and spine surgery evaluation. Spinal hardware removal is recommended whenever possible. Utilization of a pedicled muscle flap reinforces primary closure and allows coverage of the vertebral bony defect. Nutrition, thyroid repletion, and culture-directed IV antibiotics are necessary to optimize esophageal perforation repair. Hindawi 2019-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6614980/ /pubmed/31341480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7682654 Text en Copyright © 2019 Thomas S. Lee et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Lee, Thomas S.
Appelbaum, Eric N.
Sheen, Derek
Han, Reintine
Wie, Benjamin
Esophageal Perforation due to Anterior Cervical Spine Hardware Placement: Case Series
title Esophageal Perforation due to Anterior Cervical Spine Hardware Placement: Case Series
title_full Esophageal Perforation due to Anterior Cervical Spine Hardware Placement: Case Series
title_fullStr Esophageal Perforation due to Anterior Cervical Spine Hardware Placement: Case Series
title_full_unstemmed Esophageal Perforation due to Anterior Cervical Spine Hardware Placement: Case Series
title_short Esophageal Perforation due to Anterior Cervical Spine Hardware Placement: Case Series
title_sort esophageal perforation due to anterior cervical spine hardware placement: case series
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6614980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31341480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7682654
work_keys_str_mv AT leethomass esophagealperforationduetoanteriorcervicalspinehardwareplacementcaseseries
AT appelbaumericn esophagealperforationduetoanteriorcervicalspinehardwareplacementcaseseries
AT sheenderek esophagealperforationduetoanteriorcervicalspinehardwareplacementcaseseries
AT hanreintine esophagealperforationduetoanteriorcervicalspinehardwareplacementcaseseries
AT wiebenjamin esophagealperforationduetoanteriorcervicalspinehardwareplacementcaseseries