Cargando…
Parental perspectives on retention and secondary use of neonatal dried bloodspots: a Dutch mixed methods study
BACKGROUND: Neonatal bloodspot screening (NBS) identifies conditions to offer early intervention and minimize irreversible damage. NBS policies guide a comprehensive system including processes for storage of neonatal dried blood spots (NDBS). NDBS retention and secondary use policies have been subje...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6615086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31288776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1590-8 |
_version_ | 1783433293603012608 |
---|---|
author | Jansen, Marleen E. van den Bosch, Lion J. M. Hendriks, Marjolein J. Scheffer, Mariska M. J. Heijnen, Marie-Louise Douglas, Conor M. W. van El, Carla G. |
author_facet | Jansen, Marleen E. van den Bosch, Lion J. M. Hendriks, Marjolein J. Scheffer, Mariska M. J. Heijnen, Marie-Louise Douglas, Conor M. W. van El, Carla G. |
author_sort | Jansen, Marleen E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Neonatal bloodspot screening (NBS) identifies conditions to offer early intervention and minimize irreversible damage. NBS policies guide a comprehensive system including processes for storage of neonatal dried blood spots (NDBS). NDBS retention and secondary use policies have been subject of public debates internationally, suggesting that the public’s perceptions of NDBS policy are not always on par with existing policies. The current study aims to provide insight in relevant factors for new parents in the Netherlands regarding retention and secondary use of NDBS. These factors can be taken into account when developing or updating NDBS policies. METHODS: A mixed methods design was used combining an online survey (n = 753), focus groups (6 groups, 37 participants), and individual in-depth interviews (n = 7). The discussed topics included: parental information, obtaining informed consent, support for retention, and support for secondary use. The study population consisted of Dutch-speaking new parents: pregnant women (≥20 weeks) and/or their partner, and parents of at least one child (≤5 years). RESULTS: New parents expressed needs for easily accessible information, adequate communication on the retention and (potential) use of NDBS, clearly described safeguards for privacy, a more active consent process, regulation for the actors conducting NDBS research, and parental involvement in decisions on secondary use. Overall, participants were positive about prolonged retention and different types of secondary use if those needs were met. CONCLUSIONS: While parental involvement is a challenge, our study is an example of gauging parent’s perspectives on NDBS policy and contributes to including these perspectives in the current policy discussion on longer retention. Prolonged retention could be a feasible option in the Netherlands if several prerequisites are met. Therefore, implementation studies involving parents are needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12887-019-1590-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6615086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66150862019-07-18 Parental perspectives on retention and secondary use of neonatal dried bloodspots: a Dutch mixed methods study Jansen, Marleen E. van den Bosch, Lion J. M. Hendriks, Marjolein J. Scheffer, Mariska M. J. Heijnen, Marie-Louise Douglas, Conor M. W. van El, Carla G. BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Neonatal bloodspot screening (NBS) identifies conditions to offer early intervention and minimize irreversible damage. NBS policies guide a comprehensive system including processes for storage of neonatal dried blood spots (NDBS). NDBS retention and secondary use policies have been subject of public debates internationally, suggesting that the public’s perceptions of NDBS policy are not always on par with existing policies. The current study aims to provide insight in relevant factors for new parents in the Netherlands regarding retention and secondary use of NDBS. These factors can be taken into account when developing or updating NDBS policies. METHODS: A mixed methods design was used combining an online survey (n = 753), focus groups (6 groups, 37 participants), and individual in-depth interviews (n = 7). The discussed topics included: parental information, obtaining informed consent, support for retention, and support for secondary use. The study population consisted of Dutch-speaking new parents: pregnant women (≥20 weeks) and/or their partner, and parents of at least one child (≤5 years). RESULTS: New parents expressed needs for easily accessible information, adequate communication on the retention and (potential) use of NDBS, clearly described safeguards for privacy, a more active consent process, regulation for the actors conducting NDBS research, and parental involvement in decisions on secondary use. Overall, participants were positive about prolonged retention and different types of secondary use if those needs were met. CONCLUSIONS: While parental involvement is a challenge, our study is an example of gauging parent’s perspectives on NDBS policy and contributes to including these perspectives in the current policy discussion on longer retention. Prolonged retention could be a feasible option in the Netherlands if several prerequisites are met. Therefore, implementation studies involving parents are needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12887-019-1590-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6615086/ /pubmed/31288776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1590-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jansen, Marleen E. van den Bosch, Lion J. M. Hendriks, Marjolein J. Scheffer, Mariska M. J. Heijnen, Marie-Louise Douglas, Conor M. W. van El, Carla G. Parental perspectives on retention and secondary use of neonatal dried bloodspots: a Dutch mixed methods study |
title | Parental perspectives on retention and secondary use of neonatal dried bloodspots: a Dutch mixed methods study |
title_full | Parental perspectives on retention and secondary use of neonatal dried bloodspots: a Dutch mixed methods study |
title_fullStr | Parental perspectives on retention and secondary use of neonatal dried bloodspots: a Dutch mixed methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Parental perspectives on retention and secondary use of neonatal dried bloodspots: a Dutch mixed methods study |
title_short | Parental perspectives on retention and secondary use of neonatal dried bloodspots: a Dutch mixed methods study |
title_sort | parental perspectives on retention and secondary use of neonatal dried bloodspots: a dutch mixed methods study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6615086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31288776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1590-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jansenmarleene parentalperspectivesonretentionandsecondaryuseofneonataldriedbloodspotsadutchmixedmethodsstudy AT vandenboschlionjm parentalperspectivesonretentionandsecondaryuseofneonataldriedbloodspotsadutchmixedmethodsstudy AT hendriksmarjoleinj parentalperspectivesonretentionandsecondaryuseofneonataldriedbloodspotsadutchmixedmethodsstudy AT scheffermariskamj parentalperspectivesonretentionandsecondaryuseofneonataldriedbloodspotsadutchmixedmethodsstudy AT heijnenmarielouise parentalperspectivesonretentionandsecondaryuseofneonataldriedbloodspotsadutchmixedmethodsstudy AT douglasconormw parentalperspectivesonretentionandsecondaryuseofneonataldriedbloodspotsadutchmixedmethodsstudy AT vanelcarlag parentalperspectivesonretentionandsecondaryuseofneonataldriedbloodspotsadutchmixedmethodsstudy |