Cargando…

Shared medical appointments and patient-centered experience: a mixed-methods systematic review

BACKGROUND: Shared medical appointments (SMAs), or group visits, are a healthcare delivery method with the potential to improve chronic disease management and preventive care. In this review, we sought to better understand opportunities, barriers, and limitations to SMAs based on patient experience...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wadsworth, Kim H., Archibald, Trevor G., Payne, Allison E., Cleary, Anita K., Haney, Byron L., Hoverman, Adam S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6615093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31286876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0972-1
_version_ 1783433295289122816
author Wadsworth, Kim H.
Archibald, Trevor G.
Payne, Allison E.
Cleary, Anita K.
Haney, Byron L.
Hoverman, Adam S.
author_facet Wadsworth, Kim H.
Archibald, Trevor G.
Payne, Allison E.
Cleary, Anita K.
Haney, Byron L.
Hoverman, Adam S.
author_sort Wadsworth, Kim H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Shared medical appointments (SMAs), or group visits, are a healthcare delivery method with the potential to improve chronic disease management and preventive care. In this review, we sought to better understand opportunities, barriers, and limitations to SMAs based on patient experience in the primary care context. METHODS: An experienced biomedical librarian conducted literature searches of PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and SSRN for peer-reviewed publications published 1997 or after. We searched grey literature, nonempirical reports, social science publications, and citations from published systematic reviews. The search yielded 1359 papers, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method studies. Categorization of the extracted data informed a thematic synthesis. We did not perform a formal meta-analysis. RESULTS: Screening and quality assessment yielded 13 quantitative controlled trials, 11 qualitative papers, and two mixed methods studies that met inclusion criteria. We identified three consistent models of care: cooperative health care clinic (five articles), shared medical appointment / group visit (10 articles) and group prenatal care / CenteringPregnancy® (11 articles). CONCLUSIONS: SMAs in a variety of formats are increasingly employed in primary care settings, with no singular gold standard. Accepting and implementing this nontraditional approach by both patients and clinicians can yield measurable improvements in patient trust, patient perception of quality of care and quality of life, and relevant biophysical measurements of clinical parameters. Further refinement of this healthcare delivery model will be best driven by standardizing measures of patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-019-0972-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6615093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66150932019-07-18 Shared medical appointments and patient-centered experience: a mixed-methods systematic review Wadsworth, Kim H. Archibald, Trevor G. Payne, Allison E. Cleary, Anita K. Haney, Byron L. Hoverman, Adam S. BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Shared medical appointments (SMAs), or group visits, are a healthcare delivery method with the potential to improve chronic disease management and preventive care. In this review, we sought to better understand opportunities, barriers, and limitations to SMAs based on patient experience in the primary care context. METHODS: An experienced biomedical librarian conducted literature searches of PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and SSRN for peer-reviewed publications published 1997 or after. We searched grey literature, nonempirical reports, social science publications, and citations from published systematic reviews. The search yielded 1359 papers, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method studies. Categorization of the extracted data informed a thematic synthesis. We did not perform a formal meta-analysis. RESULTS: Screening and quality assessment yielded 13 quantitative controlled trials, 11 qualitative papers, and two mixed methods studies that met inclusion criteria. We identified three consistent models of care: cooperative health care clinic (five articles), shared medical appointment / group visit (10 articles) and group prenatal care / CenteringPregnancy® (11 articles). CONCLUSIONS: SMAs in a variety of formats are increasingly employed in primary care settings, with no singular gold standard. Accepting and implementing this nontraditional approach by both patients and clinicians can yield measurable improvements in patient trust, patient perception of quality of care and quality of life, and relevant biophysical measurements of clinical parameters. Further refinement of this healthcare delivery model will be best driven by standardizing measures of patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-019-0972-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6615093/ /pubmed/31286876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0972-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wadsworth, Kim H.
Archibald, Trevor G.
Payne, Allison E.
Cleary, Anita K.
Haney, Byron L.
Hoverman, Adam S.
Shared medical appointments and patient-centered experience: a mixed-methods systematic review
title Shared medical appointments and patient-centered experience: a mixed-methods systematic review
title_full Shared medical appointments and patient-centered experience: a mixed-methods systematic review
title_fullStr Shared medical appointments and patient-centered experience: a mixed-methods systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Shared medical appointments and patient-centered experience: a mixed-methods systematic review
title_short Shared medical appointments and patient-centered experience: a mixed-methods systematic review
title_sort shared medical appointments and patient-centered experience: a mixed-methods systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6615093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31286876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0972-1
work_keys_str_mv AT wadsworthkimh sharedmedicalappointmentsandpatientcenteredexperienceamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT archibaldtrevorg sharedmedicalappointmentsandpatientcenteredexperienceamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT payneallisone sharedmedicalappointmentsandpatientcenteredexperienceamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT clearyanitak sharedmedicalappointmentsandpatientcenteredexperienceamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT haneybyronl sharedmedicalappointmentsandpatientcenteredexperienceamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT hovermanadams sharedmedicalappointmentsandpatientcenteredexperienceamixedmethodssystematicreview