Cargando…

Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The direct and indirect bonding techniques are commonly used in orthodontic treatment. The differences of the two techniques deserve evidence-based study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), wherein direct and indirect bonding techniques were used in orthodontic p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yanxi, Mei, Li, Wei, Jieya, Yan, Xinyu, Zhang, Xu, Zheng, Wei, Li, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6615229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31286897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0831-4
_version_ 1783433326853357568
author Li, Yanxi
Mei, Li
Wei, Jieya
Yan, Xinyu
Zhang, Xu
Zheng, Wei
Li, Yu
author_facet Li, Yanxi
Mei, Li
Wei, Jieya
Yan, Xinyu
Zhang, Xu
Zheng, Wei
Li, Yu
author_sort Li, Yanxi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The direct and indirect bonding techniques are commonly used in orthodontic treatment. The differences of the two techniques deserve evidence-based study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), wherein direct and indirect bonding techniques were used in orthodontic patients were considered. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Web of Science databases were searched to identify relevant articles published up to December 2018. Grey literature was also searched. Two authors performed data extraction independently and in duplicate using the data collection form. The included trials were assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. RESULTS: Of the 1557 studies screened, 42 full articles were scrutinized and assessed for eligibility. Eight RCTs (247 participants) were finally included for the analyses. The qualitative synthesis showed that no significant difference existed in the accuracy of bracket placement and oral hygiene status between the two bonding techniques. The indirect bonding was found to involve less chairside time but more total working time compared with the direct bonding. The meta-analysis on bond failure rate demonstrated no significant difference between the direct and indirect bonding (RR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.78–1.64, I(2) = 22%, P = 0.50). Consistent results were obtained in the subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Weak evidence suggested that the direct and indirect bonding techniques had no significant difference in bracket placement accuracy, oral hygiene status and bond failure rate, for bonding orthodontic brackets. The indirect bonding might require less chairside time but more total working time in comparison with the direct bonding technique. High-quality well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed before a conclusive recommendation could be made. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12903-019-0831-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6615229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66152292019-07-18 Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis Li, Yanxi Mei, Li Wei, Jieya Yan, Xinyu Zhang, Xu Zheng, Wei Li, Yu BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The direct and indirect bonding techniques are commonly used in orthodontic treatment. The differences of the two techniques deserve evidence-based study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), wherein direct and indirect bonding techniques were used in orthodontic patients were considered. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Web of Science databases were searched to identify relevant articles published up to December 2018. Grey literature was also searched. Two authors performed data extraction independently and in duplicate using the data collection form. The included trials were assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. RESULTS: Of the 1557 studies screened, 42 full articles were scrutinized and assessed for eligibility. Eight RCTs (247 participants) were finally included for the analyses. The qualitative synthesis showed that no significant difference existed in the accuracy of bracket placement and oral hygiene status between the two bonding techniques. The indirect bonding was found to involve less chairside time but more total working time compared with the direct bonding. The meta-analysis on bond failure rate demonstrated no significant difference between the direct and indirect bonding (RR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.78–1.64, I(2) = 22%, P = 0.50). Consistent results were obtained in the subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Weak evidence suggested that the direct and indirect bonding techniques had no significant difference in bracket placement accuracy, oral hygiene status and bond failure rate, for bonding orthodontic brackets. The indirect bonding might require less chairside time but more total working time in comparison with the direct bonding technique. High-quality well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed before a conclusive recommendation could be made. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12903-019-0831-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6615229/ /pubmed/31286897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0831-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Yanxi
Mei, Li
Wei, Jieya
Yan, Xinyu
Zhang, Xu
Zheng, Wei
Li, Yu
Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6615229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31286897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0831-4
work_keys_str_mv AT liyanxi effectivenessefficiencyandadverseeffectsofusingdirectorindirectbondingtechniqueinorthodonticpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT meili effectivenessefficiencyandadverseeffectsofusingdirectorindirectbondingtechniqueinorthodonticpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT weijieya effectivenessefficiencyandadverseeffectsofusingdirectorindirectbondingtechniqueinorthodonticpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yanxinyu effectivenessefficiencyandadverseeffectsofusingdirectorindirectbondingtechniqueinorthodonticpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangxu effectivenessefficiencyandadverseeffectsofusingdirectorindirectbondingtechniqueinorthodonticpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhengwei effectivenessefficiencyandadverseeffectsofusingdirectorindirectbondingtechniqueinorthodonticpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liyu effectivenessefficiencyandadverseeffectsofusingdirectorindirectbondingtechniqueinorthodonticpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis