Cargando…

Systematic review protocol: an assessment of the post-approval challenges of autologous CAR-T therapy delivery

INTRODUCTION: Following recent regulatory approvals of two chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies, the field now faces a number of post-approval challenges. These challenges are in some respects defined and, in others, uncertain due to the nascence of the field. At present, information p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lam, Ching, Meinert, Edward, Halioua-Haubold, Celine-Lea, Carter, Alison, Yang, Aidong, Brindley, David, Cui, Zhanfeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6615899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31278092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026172
_version_ 1783433419721539584
author Lam, Ching
Meinert, Edward
Halioua-Haubold, Celine-Lea
Carter, Alison
Yang, Aidong
Brindley, David
Cui, Zhanfeng
author_facet Lam, Ching
Meinert, Edward
Halioua-Haubold, Celine-Lea
Carter, Alison
Yang, Aidong
Brindley, David
Cui, Zhanfeng
author_sort Lam, Ching
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Following recent regulatory approvals of two chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies, the field now faces a number of post-approval challenges. These challenges are in some respects defined and, in others, uncertain due to the nascence of the field. At present, information pertaining to such post-approval challenges are scattered in various previous reviews or raised in singular papers reporting experience in working with the therapy. This systematic review is designed to evaluate and summarise the post-approval challenges for robust delivery of CAR-T therapies to inform future work on the optimisation of CAR-T delivery to patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search Medline, EMBASE (OvidSP), BIOSIS & Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ICER database, NICE Evidence Search, CEA Registry, WHOLIS WHO Library and Scopus for studies published between 2014 and the present. In addition, a Google search for grey literature such as bioprocess blog posts, opinion pieces, press releases and listed companies involved in CAR-T development annual reports will be conducted. Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts identified from the search and accept or reject the studies according to the study inclusion criteria and any discrepancies will be discussed and resolved. The quality of the selected literature will be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme(CASP) Systematic Review checklist and grey literature will be assessed using the Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, Significance (AACODS) checklist. Data from eligible publications will be categorised using a flowchart and extracted using a data abstraction form. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the post-approval challenges of CAR-T therapies will be conducted based on the results attained. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The executed study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The findings from this review will be used to inform the development of an optimisation model for robust delivery of CAR-T therapies using a systems engineering approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018109756.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6615899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66158992019-07-28 Systematic review protocol: an assessment of the post-approval challenges of autologous CAR-T therapy delivery Lam, Ching Meinert, Edward Halioua-Haubold, Celine-Lea Carter, Alison Yang, Aidong Brindley, David Cui, Zhanfeng BMJ Open Haematology (Incl Blood Transfusion) INTRODUCTION: Following recent regulatory approvals of two chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies, the field now faces a number of post-approval challenges. These challenges are in some respects defined and, in others, uncertain due to the nascence of the field. At present, information pertaining to such post-approval challenges are scattered in various previous reviews or raised in singular papers reporting experience in working with the therapy. This systematic review is designed to evaluate and summarise the post-approval challenges for robust delivery of CAR-T therapies to inform future work on the optimisation of CAR-T delivery to patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search Medline, EMBASE (OvidSP), BIOSIS & Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ICER database, NICE Evidence Search, CEA Registry, WHOLIS WHO Library and Scopus for studies published between 2014 and the present. In addition, a Google search for grey literature such as bioprocess blog posts, opinion pieces, press releases and listed companies involved in CAR-T development annual reports will be conducted. Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts identified from the search and accept or reject the studies according to the study inclusion criteria and any discrepancies will be discussed and resolved. The quality of the selected literature will be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme(CASP) Systematic Review checklist and grey literature will be assessed using the Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, Significance (AACODS) checklist. Data from eligible publications will be categorised using a flowchart and extracted using a data abstraction form. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the post-approval challenges of CAR-T therapies will be conducted based on the results attained. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The executed study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The findings from this review will be used to inform the development of an optimisation model for robust delivery of CAR-T therapies using a systems engineering approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018109756. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6615899/ /pubmed/31278092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026172 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Haematology (Incl Blood Transfusion)
Lam, Ching
Meinert, Edward
Halioua-Haubold, Celine-Lea
Carter, Alison
Yang, Aidong
Brindley, David
Cui, Zhanfeng
Systematic review protocol: an assessment of the post-approval challenges of autologous CAR-T therapy delivery
title Systematic review protocol: an assessment of the post-approval challenges of autologous CAR-T therapy delivery
title_full Systematic review protocol: an assessment of the post-approval challenges of autologous CAR-T therapy delivery
title_fullStr Systematic review protocol: an assessment of the post-approval challenges of autologous CAR-T therapy delivery
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review protocol: an assessment of the post-approval challenges of autologous CAR-T therapy delivery
title_short Systematic review protocol: an assessment of the post-approval challenges of autologous CAR-T therapy delivery
title_sort systematic review protocol: an assessment of the post-approval challenges of autologous car-t therapy delivery
topic Haematology (Incl Blood Transfusion)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6615899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31278092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026172
work_keys_str_mv AT lamching systematicreviewprotocolanassessmentofthepostapprovalchallengesofautologouscarttherapydelivery
AT meinertedward systematicreviewprotocolanassessmentofthepostapprovalchallengesofautologouscarttherapydelivery
AT haliouahauboldcelinelea systematicreviewprotocolanassessmentofthepostapprovalchallengesofautologouscarttherapydelivery
AT carteralison systematicreviewprotocolanassessmentofthepostapprovalchallengesofautologouscarttherapydelivery
AT yangaidong systematicreviewprotocolanassessmentofthepostapprovalchallengesofautologouscarttherapydelivery
AT brindleydavid systematicreviewprotocolanassessmentofthepostapprovalchallengesofautologouscarttherapydelivery
AT cuizhanfeng systematicreviewprotocolanassessmentofthepostapprovalchallengesofautologouscarttherapydelivery