Cargando…
A Systematic Literature Review of Efficiency Measurement in Nursing Homes
Background: As our population ages at an increasing rate, the demand for nursing homes is rising. The challenge will be for nursing homes to maintain efficiency with limited resources while not compromising quality. This study aimed to review the nursing home efficiency literature to survey the appl...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6616898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31226787 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16122186 |
_version_ | 1783433567494209536 |
---|---|
author | Tran, Alice Nguyen, Kim-Huong Gray, Len Comans, Tracy |
author_facet | Tran, Alice Nguyen, Kim-Huong Gray, Len Comans, Tracy |
author_sort | Tran, Alice |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: As our population ages at an increasing rate, the demand for nursing homes is rising. The challenge will be for nursing homes to maintain efficiency with limited resources while not compromising quality. This study aimed to review the nursing home efficiency literature to survey the application of efficiency methods and the measurements of inputs, outputs, facility characteristics and operational environment, with a special focus on quality measurement. Methods: We systematically searched three databases for eligible studies published in English between January 1995 and December 2018, supplemented by an exhaustive search of reference lists of included studies. The studies included were available in full text, their units of analysis were nursing homes, and the analytical methods and efficiency scores were clearly reported. Results: We identified 39 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, of which 31 accounted for quality measures. Standard efficiency measurement techniques, data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier method, and their specifications (orientation, returns to scale, functional forms and error term assumptions) were adequately applied. Measurements of inputs, outputs and control variables were relatively homogenous while quality measures varied. Notably, most studies did not include all three quality dimensions (structure, process and outcome). One study claimed to include quality of life; however, it was not a well-validated and widely used measure. The impacts of quality on efficiency estimates were mixed. The effect of quality on the ranking of nursing home efficiency was rarely reported. Conclusions: When measuring nursing home efficiency, it is crucial to adjust for quality of care and resident’s quality of life because the ultimate output of nursing homes is quality-adjusted days living in the facility. Quality measures should reflect their multidimensionality and not be limited to quality of throughput (health-related events). More reliable estimation of nursing home efficiencies will require better routine data collection within the facility, where well-validated quality measures become an essential part of the minimum data requirement. It is also recommended that different efficiency methods and assumptions, and alternative measures of inputs, outputs and quality, are used for sensitivity analyses to ensure the robustness and validity of findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6616898 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66168982019-07-18 A Systematic Literature Review of Efficiency Measurement in Nursing Homes Tran, Alice Nguyen, Kim-Huong Gray, Len Comans, Tracy Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Background: As our population ages at an increasing rate, the demand for nursing homes is rising. The challenge will be for nursing homes to maintain efficiency with limited resources while not compromising quality. This study aimed to review the nursing home efficiency literature to survey the application of efficiency methods and the measurements of inputs, outputs, facility characteristics and operational environment, with a special focus on quality measurement. Methods: We systematically searched three databases for eligible studies published in English between January 1995 and December 2018, supplemented by an exhaustive search of reference lists of included studies. The studies included were available in full text, their units of analysis were nursing homes, and the analytical methods and efficiency scores were clearly reported. Results: We identified 39 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, of which 31 accounted for quality measures. Standard efficiency measurement techniques, data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier method, and their specifications (orientation, returns to scale, functional forms and error term assumptions) were adequately applied. Measurements of inputs, outputs and control variables were relatively homogenous while quality measures varied. Notably, most studies did not include all three quality dimensions (structure, process and outcome). One study claimed to include quality of life; however, it was not a well-validated and widely used measure. The impacts of quality on efficiency estimates were mixed. The effect of quality on the ranking of nursing home efficiency was rarely reported. Conclusions: When measuring nursing home efficiency, it is crucial to adjust for quality of care and resident’s quality of life because the ultimate output of nursing homes is quality-adjusted days living in the facility. Quality measures should reflect their multidimensionality and not be limited to quality of throughput (health-related events). More reliable estimation of nursing home efficiencies will require better routine data collection within the facility, where well-validated quality measures become an essential part of the minimum data requirement. It is also recommended that different efficiency methods and assumptions, and alternative measures of inputs, outputs and quality, are used for sensitivity analyses to ensure the robustness and validity of findings. MDPI 2019-06-20 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6616898/ /pubmed/31226787 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16122186 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Tran, Alice Nguyen, Kim-Huong Gray, Len Comans, Tracy A Systematic Literature Review of Efficiency Measurement in Nursing Homes |
title | A Systematic Literature Review of Efficiency Measurement in Nursing Homes |
title_full | A Systematic Literature Review of Efficiency Measurement in Nursing Homes |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Literature Review of Efficiency Measurement in Nursing Homes |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Literature Review of Efficiency Measurement in Nursing Homes |
title_short | A Systematic Literature Review of Efficiency Measurement in Nursing Homes |
title_sort | systematic literature review of efficiency measurement in nursing homes |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6616898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31226787 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16122186 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tranalice asystematicliteraturereviewofefficiencymeasurementinnursinghomes AT nguyenkimhuong asystematicliteraturereviewofefficiencymeasurementinnursinghomes AT graylen asystematicliteraturereviewofefficiencymeasurementinnursinghomes AT comanstracy asystematicliteraturereviewofefficiencymeasurementinnursinghomes AT tranalice systematicliteraturereviewofefficiencymeasurementinnursinghomes AT nguyenkimhuong systematicliteraturereviewofefficiencymeasurementinnursinghomes AT graylen systematicliteraturereviewofefficiencymeasurementinnursinghomes AT comanstracy systematicliteraturereviewofefficiencymeasurementinnursinghomes |