Cargando…

A Meta-Epidemiological Appraisal of the Effects of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy Dosing for Chronic Low Back Pain

Using a meta-analysis, meta-regression, and a meta-epidemiological approach, we conducted a systematic review to examine the influence of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) dosage on pain, disability, return to work, quality of life, depression, and anxiety in published randomised cont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dragioti, Elena, Björk, Mathilda, Larsson, Britt, Gerdle, Björn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6616996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31216757
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8060871
_version_ 1783433590131916800
author Dragioti, Elena
Björk, Mathilda
Larsson, Britt
Gerdle, Björn
author_facet Dragioti, Elena
Björk, Mathilda
Larsson, Britt
Gerdle, Björn
author_sort Dragioti, Elena
collection PubMed
description Using a meta-analysis, meta-regression, and a meta-epidemiological approach, we conducted a systematic review to examine the influence of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) dosage on pain, disability, return to work, quality of life, depression, and anxiety in published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP). We considered all RCTs of IMPT from a Cochrane review and searched PubMed for additional RCTs through 30 September 2018. A subgroup random-effects meta-analysis by length, contact, and intensity of treatment was performed followed by a meta-regression analysis. Using random and fixed-effect models and a summary relative odds ratio (ROR), we compared the effect sizes (ES) from short-length, non-daily contact, and low-intensity RCTs with long-length, daily contact, and high-intensity RCTs. Heterogeneity was quantified with the I(2) metric. A total of 47 RCTs were selected. Subgroup meta-analysis showed that there were larger ES for pain and disability in RCTs with long-length, non-daily contact, and low intensity of treatment. Larger ES were also observed for quality of life in RCTs with short-length, non-daily contact, and low intensity treatment. However, these findings were not confirmed by the meta-regression analysis. Likewise, the summary RORs were not significant, indicating that the length, contact, and intensity of treatment did not have an overall effect on the investigated outcomes. For the outcomes investigated here, IMPT dosage is not generally associated with better ES, and an optimal dosage was not determined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6616996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66169962019-07-18 A Meta-Epidemiological Appraisal of the Effects of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy Dosing for Chronic Low Back Pain Dragioti, Elena Björk, Mathilda Larsson, Britt Gerdle, Björn J Clin Med Article Using a meta-analysis, meta-regression, and a meta-epidemiological approach, we conducted a systematic review to examine the influence of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) dosage on pain, disability, return to work, quality of life, depression, and anxiety in published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP). We considered all RCTs of IMPT from a Cochrane review and searched PubMed for additional RCTs through 30 September 2018. A subgroup random-effects meta-analysis by length, contact, and intensity of treatment was performed followed by a meta-regression analysis. Using random and fixed-effect models and a summary relative odds ratio (ROR), we compared the effect sizes (ES) from short-length, non-daily contact, and low-intensity RCTs with long-length, daily contact, and high-intensity RCTs. Heterogeneity was quantified with the I(2) metric. A total of 47 RCTs were selected. Subgroup meta-analysis showed that there were larger ES for pain and disability in RCTs with long-length, non-daily contact, and low intensity of treatment. Larger ES were also observed for quality of life in RCTs with short-length, non-daily contact, and low intensity treatment. However, these findings were not confirmed by the meta-regression analysis. Likewise, the summary RORs were not significant, indicating that the length, contact, and intensity of treatment did not have an overall effect on the investigated outcomes. For the outcomes investigated here, IMPT dosage is not generally associated with better ES, and an optimal dosage was not determined. MDPI 2019-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6616996/ /pubmed/31216757 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8060871 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dragioti, Elena
Björk, Mathilda
Larsson, Britt
Gerdle, Björn
A Meta-Epidemiological Appraisal of the Effects of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy Dosing for Chronic Low Back Pain
title A Meta-Epidemiological Appraisal of the Effects of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy Dosing for Chronic Low Back Pain
title_full A Meta-Epidemiological Appraisal of the Effects of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy Dosing for Chronic Low Back Pain
title_fullStr A Meta-Epidemiological Appraisal of the Effects of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy Dosing for Chronic Low Back Pain
title_full_unstemmed A Meta-Epidemiological Appraisal of the Effects of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy Dosing for Chronic Low Back Pain
title_short A Meta-Epidemiological Appraisal of the Effects of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy Dosing for Chronic Low Back Pain
title_sort meta-epidemiological appraisal of the effects of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy dosing for chronic low back pain
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6616996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31216757
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8060871
work_keys_str_mv AT dragiotielena ametaepidemiologicalappraisaloftheeffectsofinterdisciplinarymultimodalpaintherapydosingforchroniclowbackpain
AT bjorkmathilda ametaepidemiologicalappraisaloftheeffectsofinterdisciplinarymultimodalpaintherapydosingforchroniclowbackpain
AT larssonbritt ametaepidemiologicalappraisaloftheeffectsofinterdisciplinarymultimodalpaintherapydosingforchroniclowbackpain
AT gerdlebjorn ametaepidemiologicalappraisaloftheeffectsofinterdisciplinarymultimodalpaintherapydosingforchroniclowbackpain
AT dragiotielena metaepidemiologicalappraisaloftheeffectsofinterdisciplinarymultimodalpaintherapydosingforchroniclowbackpain
AT bjorkmathilda metaepidemiologicalappraisaloftheeffectsofinterdisciplinarymultimodalpaintherapydosingforchroniclowbackpain
AT larssonbritt metaepidemiologicalappraisaloftheeffectsofinterdisciplinarymultimodalpaintherapydosingforchroniclowbackpain
AT gerdlebjorn metaepidemiologicalappraisaloftheeffectsofinterdisciplinarymultimodalpaintherapydosingforchroniclowbackpain