Cargando…
A Meta-Epidemiological Appraisal of the Effects of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy Dosing for Chronic Low Back Pain
Using a meta-analysis, meta-regression, and a meta-epidemiological approach, we conducted a systematic review to examine the influence of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) dosage on pain, disability, return to work, quality of life, depression, and anxiety in published randomised cont...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6616996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31216757 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8060871 |
_version_ | 1783433590131916800 |
---|---|
author | Dragioti, Elena Björk, Mathilda Larsson, Britt Gerdle, Björn |
author_facet | Dragioti, Elena Björk, Mathilda Larsson, Britt Gerdle, Björn |
author_sort | Dragioti, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Using a meta-analysis, meta-regression, and a meta-epidemiological approach, we conducted a systematic review to examine the influence of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) dosage on pain, disability, return to work, quality of life, depression, and anxiety in published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP). We considered all RCTs of IMPT from a Cochrane review and searched PubMed for additional RCTs through 30 September 2018. A subgroup random-effects meta-analysis by length, contact, and intensity of treatment was performed followed by a meta-regression analysis. Using random and fixed-effect models and a summary relative odds ratio (ROR), we compared the effect sizes (ES) from short-length, non-daily contact, and low-intensity RCTs with long-length, daily contact, and high-intensity RCTs. Heterogeneity was quantified with the I(2) metric. A total of 47 RCTs were selected. Subgroup meta-analysis showed that there were larger ES for pain and disability in RCTs with long-length, non-daily contact, and low intensity of treatment. Larger ES were also observed for quality of life in RCTs with short-length, non-daily contact, and low intensity treatment. However, these findings were not confirmed by the meta-regression analysis. Likewise, the summary RORs were not significant, indicating that the length, contact, and intensity of treatment did not have an overall effect on the investigated outcomes. For the outcomes investigated here, IMPT dosage is not generally associated with better ES, and an optimal dosage was not determined. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6616996 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66169962019-07-18 A Meta-Epidemiological Appraisal of the Effects of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy Dosing for Chronic Low Back Pain Dragioti, Elena Björk, Mathilda Larsson, Britt Gerdle, Björn J Clin Med Article Using a meta-analysis, meta-regression, and a meta-epidemiological approach, we conducted a systematic review to examine the influence of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) dosage on pain, disability, return to work, quality of life, depression, and anxiety in published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP). We considered all RCTs of IMPT from a Cochrane review and searched PubMed for additional RCTs through 30 September 2018. A subgroup random-effects meta-analysis by length, contact, and intensity of treatment was performed followed by a meta-regression analysis. Using random and fixed-effect models and a summary relative odds ratio (ROR), we compared the effect sizes (ES) from short-length, non-daily contact, and low-intensity RCTs with long-length, daily contact, and high-intensity RCTs. Heterogeneity was quantified with the I(2) metric. A total of 47 RCTs were selected. Subgroup meta-analysis showed that there were larger ES for pain and disability in RCTs with long-length, non-daily contact, and low intensity of treatment. Larger ES were also observed for quality of life in RCTs with short-length, non-daily contact, and low intensity treatment. However, these findings were not confirmed by the meta-regression analysis. Likewise, the summary RORs were not significant, indicating that the length, contact, and intensity of treatment did not have an overall effect on the investigated outcomes. For the outcomes investigated here, IMPT dosage is not generally associated with better ES, and an optimal dosage was not determined. MDPI 2019-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6616996/ /pubmed/31216757 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8060871 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Dragioti, Elena Björk, Mathilda Larsson, Britt Gerdle, Björn A Meta-Epidemiological Appraisal of the Effects of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy Dosing for Chronic Low Back Pain |
title | A Meta-Epidemiological Appraisal of the Effects of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy Dosing for Chronic Low Back Pain |
title_full | A Meta-Epidemiological Appraisal of the Effects of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy Dosing for Chronic Low Back Pain |
title_fullStr | A Meta-Epidemiological Appraisal of the Effects of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy Dosing for Chronic Low Back Pain |
title_full_unstemmed | A Meta-Epidemiological Appraisal of the Effects of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy Dosing for Chronic Low Back Pain |
title_short | A Meta-Epidemiological Appraisal of the Effects of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy Dosing for Chronic Low Back Pain |
title_sort | meta-epidemiological appraisal of the effects of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy dosing for chronic low back pain |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6616996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31216757 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8060871 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dragiotielena ametaepidemiologicalappraisaloftheeffectsofinterdisciplinarymultimodalpaintherapydosingforchroniclowbackpain AT bjorkmathilda ametaepidemiologicalappraisaloftheeffectsofinterdisciplinarymultimodalpaintherapydosingforchroniclowbackpain AT larssonbritt ametaepidemiologicalappraisaloftheeffectsofinterdisciplinarymultimodalpaintherapydosingforchroniclowbackpain AT gerdlebjorn ametaepidemiologicalappraisaloftheeffectsofinterdisciplinarymultimodalpaintherapydosingforchroniclowbackpain AT dragiotielena metaepidemiologicalappraisaloftheeffectsofinterdisciplinarymultimodalpaintherapydosingforchroniclowbackpain AT bjorkmathilda metaepidemiologicalappraisaloftheeffectsofinterdisciplinarymultimodalpaintherapydosingforchroniclowbackpain AT larssonbritt metaepidemiologicalappraisaloftheeffectsofinterdisciplinarymultimodalpaintherapydosingforchroniclowbackpain AT gerdlebjorn metaepidemiologicalappraisaloftheeffectsofinterdisciplinarymultimodalpaintherapydosingforchroniclowbackpain |