Cargando…

Glycemic Control during Pregnancy—A Predictor of Vitamin C Status at Labor in Type 1 Diabetic Women?

Several experimental studies have suggested that vitamin C (vitC) deficiency during pregnancy may be detrimental to fetal development, and observational studies have shown that vitC status is lower during pregnancy and in people with diabetes. A cross-sectional study in pregnant type 1 diabetic wome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juhl, Bente, Lauszus, Finn F., Lykkesfeldt, Jens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31159250
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox8060153
_version_ 1783433607065370624
author Juhl, Bente
Lauszus, Finn F.
Lykkesfeldt, Jens
author_facet Juhl, Bente
Lauszus, Finn F.
Lykkesfeldt, Jens
author_sort Juhl, Bente
collection PubMed
description Several experimental studies have suggested that vitamin C (vitC) deficiency during pregnancy may be detrimental to fetal development, and observational studies have shown that vitC status is lower during pregnancy and in people with diabetes. A cross-sectional study in pregnant type 1 diabetic women found that poor maternal vitC status was a significant predictor for obstetric complications of pregnancy when measured within four weeks before labor. The plasma vitC concentration was significantly negatively correlated to HbA1c, the biomarker of glycemic control well-known to be associated with the outcome of the diabetic pregnancy. Here, we evaluated HbA1c during pregnancy in relation to the measured vitC levels in late pregnancy based on data from 46 women from the same cohort. Regression analysis showed that HbA1c of first trimester, the combined mean HbA1c of first and second trimester, mean HbA1c of the whole pregnancy (first, second and third trimester combined), and HbA1c of third trimester alone were all associated with vitC in late pregnancy (p = 0.03, n = 45; p = 0.034, n = 43; p = 0.017, n = 42; and p = 0.008, n = 46, respectively). In third trimester, when adjusted for creatinine clearance, the association between vitC and HbA1c persisted (p = 0.029). Women in third trimester with HbA1c above 7.0% had an increased risk of having poor vitC status compared to women with HbA1c below this level (11 out of 21 vs. 2 out of 25 women, p < 0.001). The results suggest that high HbA1c is associated with poor maternal vitC status and potentially inadequate supply of vitC for the neonate. HbA1c may thus be a relevant substitute biomarker for identifying pregnant women who might benefit from vitC supplementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6617071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66170712019-07-18 Glycemic Control during Pregnancy—A Predictor of Vitamin C Status at Labor in Type 1 Diabetic Women? Juhl, Bente Lauszus, Finn F. Lykkesfeldt, Jens Antioxidants (Basel) Article Several experimental studies have suggested that vitamin C (vitC) deficiency during pregnancy may be detrimental to fetal development, and observational studies have shown that vitC status is lower during pregnancy and in people with diabetes. A cross-sectional study in pregnant type 1 diabetic women found that poor maternal vitC status was a significant predictor for obstetric complications of pregnancy when measured within four weeks before labor. The plasma vitC concentration was significantly negatively correlated to HbA1c, the biomarker of glycemic control well-known to be associated with the outcome of the diabetic pregnancy. Here, we evaluated HbA1c during pregnancy in relation to the measured vitC levels in late pregnancy based on data from 46 women from the same cohort. Regression analysis showed that HbA1c of first trimester, the combined mean HbA1c of first and second trimester, mean HbA1c of the whole pregnancy (first, second and third trimester combined), and HbA1c of third trimester alone were all associated with vitC in late pregnancy (p = 0.03, n = 45; p = 0.034, n = 43; p = 0.017, n = 42; and p = 0.008, n = 46, respectively). In third trimester, when adjusted for creatinine clearance, the association between vitC and HbA1c persisted (p = 0.029). Women in third trimester with HbA1c above 7.0% had an increased risk of having poor vitC status compared to women with HbA1c below this level (11 out of 21 vs. 2 out of 25 women, p < 0.001). The results suggest that high HbA1c is associated with poor maternal vitC status and potentially inadequate supply of vitC for the neonate. HbA1c may thus be a relevant substitute biomarker for identifying pregnant women who might benefit from vitC supplementation. MDPI 2019-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6617071/ /pubmed/31159250 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox8060153 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Juhl, Bente
Lauszus, Finn F.
Lykkesfeldt, Jens
Glycemic Control during Pregnancy—A Predictor of Vitamin C Status at Labor in Type 1 Diabetic Women?
title Glycemic Control during Pregnancy—A Predictor of Vitamin C Status at Labor in Type 1 Diabetic Women?
title_full Glycemic Control during Pregnancy—A Predictor of Vitamin C Status at Labor in Type 1 Diabetic Women?
title_fullStr Glycemic Control during Pregnancy—A Predictor of Vitamin C Status at Labor in Type 1 Diabetic Women?
title_full_unstemmed Glycemic Control during Pregnancy—A Predictor of Vitamin C Status at Labor in Type 1 Diabetic Women?
title_short Glycemic Control during Pregnancy—A Predictor of Vitamin C Status at Labor in Type 1 Diabetic Women?
title_sort glycemic control during pregnancy—a predictor of vitamin c status at labor in type 1 diabetic women?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31159250
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox8060153
work_keys_str_mv AT juhlbente glycemiccontrolduringpregnancyapredictorofvitamincstatusatlaborintype1diabeticwomen
AT lauszusfinnf glycemiccontrolduringpregnancyapredictorofvitamincstatusatlaborintype1diabeticwomen
AT lykkesfeldtjens glycemiccontrolduringpregnancyapredictorofvitamincstatusatlaborintype1diabeticwomen