Cargando…

Public Health Messages Associated with Low UV Index Values Need Reconsideration

Overexposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation is the main modifiable risk factor for skin cancer. The Global Solar Ultraviolet Index (UVI) was introduced as a tool to visualize the intensity of UV radiation on a certain day, which should enable and encourage people to take appropriate protective measur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lehmann, Maria, Pfahlberg, Annette B., Sandmann, Henner, Uter, Wolfgang, Gefeller, Olaf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31212727
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16122067
_version_ 1783433621559836672
author Lehmann, Maria
Pfahlberg, Annette B.
Sandmann, Henner
Uter, Wolfgang
Gefeller, Olaf
author_facet Lehmann, Maria
Pfahlberg, Annette B.
Sandmann, Henner
Uter, Wolfgang
Gefeller, Olaf
author_sort Lehmann, Maria
collection PubMed
description Overexposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation is the main modifiable risk factor for skin cancer. The Global Solar Ultraviolet Index (UVI) was introduced as a tool to visualize the intensity of UV radiation on a certain day, which should enable and encourage people to take appropriate protective measures. The ‘low’ exposure category of the UVI, defined by a rounded UVI value of 0, 1 or 2, was linked to the health message ‘No protection required’ by the World Health Organization and partner organizations. However, published evidence corroborating this advice is not available. To evaluate the erythemal risk of low UVI days, we analyzed 14,431 daily time series of ambient erythemal irradiance data measured at nine stations of the German solar UV monitoring network during the years 2007–2016. We analyzed the proportion of days in the sample for which ambient erythemal doses calculated for various time intervals exceed average minimal erythemal doses (MEDs) of the Fitzpatrick skin phototypes I–VI to assess the potential for erythema arising from sun exposure on days with low UVI values. Additionally, we calculated for each day the minimum exposure duration needed to receive one MED. Our results indicate that on days with a UVI value of 0, risk of erythema is indeed negligible. Conversely, the abovementioned health message appears misleading when melano-compromised individuals (skin type I and II) spend more than 1.5 hours outdoors on days with a UVI value of 2. Under rare circumstances of prolonged exposure, MEDs of the two most sensitive skin types can also be exceeded even on days with a UVI value of 1. Hence, current WHO guidance for sun protection on days with low UVI values needs reconsideration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6617134
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66171342019-07-18 Public Health Messages Associated with Low UV Index Values Need Reconsideration Lehmann, Maria Pfahlberg, Annette B. Sandmann, Henner Uter, Wolfgang Gefeller, Olaf Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Overexposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation is the main modifiable risk factor for skin cancer. The Global Solar Ultraviolet Index (UVI) was introduced as a tool to visualize the intensity of UV radiation on a certain day, which should enable and encourage people to take appropriate protective measures. The ‘low’ exposure category of the UVI, defined by a rounded UVI value of 0, 1 or 2, was linked to the health message ‘No protection required’ by the World Health Organization and partner organizations. However, published evidence corroborating this advice is not available. To evaluate the erythemal risk of low UVI days, we analyzed 14,431 daily time series of ambient erythemal irradiance data measured at nine stations of the German solar UV monitoring network during the years 2007–2016. We analyzed the proportion of days in the sample for which ambient erythemal doses calculated for various time intervals exceed average minimal erythemal doses (MEDs) of the Fitzpatrick skin phototypes I–VI to assess the potential for erythema arising from sun exposure on days with low UVI values. Additionally, we calculated for each day the minimum exposure duration needed to receive one MED. Our results indicate that on days with a UVI value of 0, risk of erythema is indeed negligible. Conversely, the abovementioned health message appears misleading when melano-compromised individuals (skin type I and II) spend more than 1.5 hours outdoors on days with a UVI value of 2. Under rare circumstances of prolonged exposure, MEDs of the two most sensitive skin types can also be exceeded even on days with a UVI value of 1. Hence, current WHO guidance for sun protection on days with low UVI values needs reconsideration. MDPI 2019-06-12 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6617134/ /pubmed/31212727 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16122067 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lehmann, Maria
Pfahlberg, Annette B.
Sandmann, Henner
Uter, Wolfgang
Gefeller, Olaf
Public Health Messages Associated with Low UV Index Values Need Reconsideration
title Public Health Messages Associated with Low UV Index Values Need Reconsideration
title_full Public Health Messages Associated with Low UV Index Values Need Reconsideration
title_fullStr Public Health Messages Associated with Low UV Index Values Need Reconsideration
title_full_unstemmed Public Health Messages Associated with Low UV Index Values Need Reconsideration
title_short Public Health Messages Associated with Low UV Index Values Need Reconsideration
title_sort public health messages associated with low uv index values need reconsideration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31212727
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16122067
work_keys_str_mv AT lehmannmaria publichealthmessagesassociatedwithlowuvindexvaluesneedreconsideration
AT pfahlbergannetteb publichealthmessagesassociatedwithlowuvindexvaluesneedreconsideration
AT sandmannhenner publichealthmessagesassociatedwithlowuvindexvaluesneedreconsideration
AT uterwolfgang publichealthmessagesassociatedwithlowuvindexvaluesneedreconsideration
AT gefellerolaf publichealthmessagesassociatedwithlowuvindexvaluesneedreconsideration