Cargando…

Quality of reporting on thoracic radiotherapy technique in prospective lung cancer trials: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess the quality of reporting of thoracic (T) RT technique for curative intent treatment in prospective lung cancer trials. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE for eligible trials published from 1996 to 2016. We assessed the included trials’ reports on whether they...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soon, Yu Yang, Chen, Desiree, Tan, Teng Hwee, Seong Tey, Jeremy Chee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31261531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016124
_version_ 1783433656894750720
author Soon, Yu Yang
Chen, Desiree
Tan, Teng Hwee
Seong Tey, Jeremy Chee
author_facet Soon, Yu Yang
Chen, Desiree
Tan, Teng Hwee
Seong Tey, Jeremy Chee
author_sort Soon, Yu Yang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess the quality of reporting of thoracic (T) RT technique for curative intent treatment in prospective lung cancer trials. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE for eligible trials published from 1996 to 2016. We assessed the included trials’ reports on whether they reported the RT dose prescription method; RT dose-planning procedures; algorithm for tissue inhomogeneity dose corrections; organs at risk dose constraints; target volume definition, simulation and/or motion management procedures; treatment verification procedures; total RT dose; fractionation schedule; conduct of quality assurance as well as presence or absence of deviations in RT treatment planning and delivery adequately. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression to determine the factors that may influence the quality of reporting. RESULTS: We found 85 eligible trial reports. Target volume definition, total RT dose, and fractionation schedules were reported adequately in more than 90% of the included trials. Algorithm for tissue inhomogeneity dose corrections, simulation and verification procedures, presence or absence of deviations in RT treatment planning and delivery were reported adequately in less than 20% of the included trials. Twenty-three trials (27%) reported 7 criteria or more adequately. Both univariable and multivariable logistic regression showed that trials with RT focused research question were more likely to have adequate quality in reporting (judged as adequate reporting in 7 criteria or more) than trials with non-RT focused question (odds ratio 4.11, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 15.43, P value = .04). CONCLUSION: There is significant variability in the quality of reporting on thoracic radiotherapy treatment in prospective lung cancer trials. Future research should focus on developing consensus guidelines to standardize the reporting of radiotherapy technique in clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6617283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66172832019-07-22 Quality of reporting on thoracic radiotherapy technique in prospective lung cancer trials: A systematic review Soon, Yu Yang Chen, Desiree Tan, Teng Hwee Seong Tey, Jeremy Chee Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess the quality of reporting of thoracic (T) RT technique for curative intent treatment in prospective lung cancer trials. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE for eligible trials published from 1996 to 2016. We assessed the included trials’ reports on whether they reported the RT dose prescription method; RT dose-planning procedures; algorithm for tissue inhomogeneity dose corrections; organs at risk dose constraints; target volume definition, simulation and/or motion management procedures; treatment verification procedures; total RT dose; fractionation schedule; conduct of quality assurance as well as presence or absence of deviations in RT treatment planning and delivery adequately. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression to determine the factors that may influence the quality of reporting. RESULTS: We found 85 eligible trial reports. Target volume definition, total RT dose, and fractionation schedules were reported adequately in more than 90% of the included trials. Algorithm for tissue inhomogeneity dose corrections, simulation and verification procedures, presence or absence of deviations in RT treatment planning and delivery were reported adequately in less than 20% of the included trials. Twenty-three trials (27%) reported 7 criteria or more adequately. Both univariable and multivariable logistic regression showed that trials with RT focused research question were more likely to have adequate quality in reporting (judged as adequate reporting in 7 criteria or more) than trials with non-RT focused question (odds ratio 4.11, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 15.43, P value = .04). CONCLUSION: There is significant variability in the quality of reporting on thoracic radiotherapy treatment in prospective lung cancer trials. Future research should focus on developing consensus guidelines to standardize the reporting of radiotherapy technique in clinical trials. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6617283/ /pubmed/31261531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016124 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Soon, Yu Yang
Chen, Desiree
Tan, Teng Hwee
Seong Tey, Jeremy Chee
Quality of reporting on thoracic radiotherapy technique in prospective lung cancer trials: A systematic review
title Quality of reporting on thoracic radiotherapy technique in prospective lung cancer trials: A systematic review
title_full Quality of reporting on thoracic radiotherapy technique in prospective lung cancer trials: A systematic review
title_fullStr Quality of reporting on thoracic radiotherapy technique in prospective lung cancer trials: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Quality of reporting on thoracic radiotherapy technique in prospective lung cancer trials: A systematic review
title_short Quality of reporting on thoracic radiotherapy technique in prospective lung cancer trials: A systematic review
title_sort quality of reporting on thoracic radiotherapy technique in prospective lung cancer trials: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31261531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016124
work_keys_str_mv AT soonyuyang qualityofreportingonthoracicradiotherapytechniqueinprospectivelungcancertrialsasystematicreview
AT chendesiree qualityofreportingonthoracicradiotherapytechniqueinprospectivelungcancertrialsasystematicreview
AT tantenghwee qualityofreportingonthoracicradiotherapytechniqueinprospectivelungcancertrialsasystematicreview
AT seongteyjeremychee qualityofreportingonthoracicradiotherapytechniqueinprospectivelungcancertrialsasystematicreview