Cargando…

MaioRegen Osteochondral Substitute for the Treatment of Knee Defects: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background: This study aims to investigate the clinical and radiological efficacy of three-dimensional acellular scaffolds (MaioRegen) in restoring osteochondral knee defects. Methods: MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Databases were searched for articles in which patients were treated w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D’Ambrosi, Riccardo, Valli, Federico, De Luca, Paola, Ursino, Nicola, Usuelli, Federico Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31159439
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8060783
_version_ 1783433662619975680
author D’Ambrosi, Riccardo
Valli, Federico
De Luca, Paola
Ursino, Nicola
Usuelli, Federico Giuseppe
author_facet D’Ambrosi, Riccardo
Valli, Federico
De Luca, Paola
Ursino, Nicola
Usuelli, Federico Giuseppe
author_sort D’Ambrosi, Riccardo
collection PubMed
description Background: This study aims to investigate the clinical and radiological efficacy of three-dimensional acellular scaffolds (MaioRegen) in restoring osteochondral knee defects. Methods: MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Databases were searched for articles in which patients were treated with MaioRegen for osteochondral knee defects. Results: A total of 471 patients were included in the study (mean age 34.07 ± 5.28 years). The treatment involved 500 lesions divided as follows: 202 (40.4%) medial femoral condyles, 107 (21.4%) lateral femoral condyles, 28 (5.6%) tibial plateaus, 46 (9.2%) trochleas, 74 (14.8%) patellas, and 43 (8.6%) unspecified femoral condyles. Mean lesion size was 3.6 ± 0.85 cm(2). Only four studies reported a follow-up longer than 24 months. Significant clinical improvement has been reported in almost all studies with further improvement up to 5 years after surgery. A total of 59 complications were reported of which 52 (11.1%) experienced minor complications and 7 (1.48%) major complications. A total of 16 (3.39%) failures were reported. Conclusion: This systematic review describes the current available evidence for the treatment of osteochondral knee defects with MaioRegen Osteochondral substitute reporting promising satisfactory and reliable results at mid-term follow-up. A low rate of complications and failure was reported, confirming the safety of this scaffold. Considering the low level of evidence of the study included in the review, this data does not support the superiority of the Maioregen in terms of clinical improvement at follow-up compared to conservative treatment or other cartilage techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6617307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66173072019-07-18 MaioRegen Osteochondral Substitute for the Treatment of Knee Defects: A Systematic Review of the Literature D’Ambrosi, Riccardo Valli, Federico De Luca, Paola Ursino, Nicola Usuelli, Federico Giuseppe J Clin Med Review Background: This study aims to investigate the clinical and radiological efficacy of three-dimensional acellular scaffolds (MaioRegen) in restoring osteochondral knee defects. Methods: MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Databases were searched for articles in which patients were treated with MaioRegen for osteochondral knee defects. Results: A total of 471 patients were included in the study (mean age 34.07 ± 5.28 years). The treatment involved 500 lesions divided as follows: 202 (40.4%) medial femoral condyles, 107 (21.4%) lateral femoral condyles, 28 (5.6%) tibial plateaus, 46 (9.2%) trochleas, 74 (14.8%) patellas, and 43 (8.6%) unspecified femoral condyles. Mean lesion size was 3.6 ± 0.85 cm(2). Only four studies reported a follow-up longer than 24 months. Significant clinical improvement has been reported in almost all studies with further improvement up to 5 years after surgery. A total of 59 complications were reported of which 52 (11.1%) experienced minor complications and 7 (1.48%) major complications. A total of 16 (3.39%) failures were reported. Conclusion: This systematic review describes the current available evidence for the treatment of osteochondral knee defects with MaioRegen Osteochondral substitute reporting promising satisfactory and reliable results at mid-term follow-up. A low rate of complications and failure was reported, confirming the safety of this scaffold. Considering the low level of evidence of the study included in the review, this data does not support the superiority of the Maioregen in terms of clinical improvement at follow-up compared to conservative treatment or other cartilage techniques. MDPI 2019-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6617307/ /pubmed/31159439 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8060783 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
D’Ambrosi, Riccardo
Valli, Federico
De Luca, Paola
Ursino, Nicola
Usuelli, Federico Giuseppe
MaioRegen Osteochondral Substitute for the Treatment of Knee Defects: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title MaioRegen Osteochondral Substitute for the Treatment of Knee Defects: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full MaioRegen Osteochondral Substitute for the Treatment of Knee Defects: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_fullStr MaioRegen Osteochondral Substitute for the Treatment of Knee Defects: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed MaioRegen Osteochondral Substitute for the Treatment of Knee Defects: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_short MaioRegen Osteochondral Substitute for the Treatment of Knee Defects: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_sort maioregen osteochondral substitute for the treatment of knee defects: a systematic review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31159439
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8060783
work_keys_str_mv AT dambrosiriccardo maioregenosteochondralsubstituteforthetreatmentofkneedefectsasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT vallifederico maioregenosteochondralsubstituteforthetreatmentofkneedefectsasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT delucapaola maioregenosteochondralsubstituteforthetreatmentofkneedefectsasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT ursinonicola maioregenosteochondralsubstituteforthetreatmentofkneedefectsasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT usuellifedericogiuseppe maioregenosteochondralsubstituteforthetreatmentofkneedefectsasystematicreviewoftheliterature