Cargando…

A Global Review of Animal–Visitor Interactions in Modern Zoos and Aquariums and Their Implications for Wild Animal Welfare

SIMPLE SUMMARY: This study explores the characteristics of animal-visitor Interactions (AVIs) (interactions between people and captive wild animals) in zoos and aquaria across the globe. We reviewed information provided on public websites of institutions that are either direct members of the World A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D’Cruze, Neil, Khan, Sophie, Carder, Gemma, Megson, David, Coulthard, Emma, Norrey, John, Groves, Georgina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31181769
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9060332
_version_ 1783433668423843840
author D’Cruze, Neil
Khan, Sophie
Carder, Gemma
Megson, David
Coulthard, Emma
Norrey, John
Groves, Georgina
author_facet D’Cruze, Neil
Khan, Sophie
Carder, Gemma
Megson, David
Coulthard, Emma
Norrey, John
Groves, Georgina
author_sort D’Cruze, Neil
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: This study explores the characteristics of animal-visitor Interactions (AVIs) (interactions between people and captive wild animals) in zoos and aquaria across the globe. We reviewed information provided on public websites of institutions that are either direct members of the World Association for Zoos and Aquariums (WAZA) or belong to regional and national associations that have WAZA membership. The opportunity for visitors to interact with wild animals was promoted on the majority of the facilities’ websites. Petting captive wild animals was the most common AVI activity advertised (43%) of facilities, and interaction with mammals was the most advertised taxonomic class (53%). Some activities involving direct contact with wildlife were promoted more commonly than expected (for example, hand feed and ride wild animals, and walk with or swim through wild animal enclosures). Some of the advertised AVIs have the potential to impact animal welfare; in light of this, we provide recommendations to balance and manage captive wild animal welfare in AVIs with other primary interconnected goals. ABSTRACT: We provide an initial insight into the occurrence and characteristics of animal-visitor interactions (AVIs) involving captive wild animals within zoos and aquaria. Using information provided online via official public websites of modern zoos and aquaria, we found that AVIs were provided by the majority of facilities. Our study revealed that a variety of AVI types were being offered. Globally, petting captive wild animals was the most prevalent AVI type advertised (n = 1241 observations, 43% (534) of facilities) and Mammalia was the most advertised taxonomic class (n = 5142; 53% (2739)). We found certain AVI types that were more commonly offered than predicted. These were opportunities to: (1) Hand feed captive wild animals in Asia, North America and Oceania; (2) ride wild animals in Europe and North America; (3) walk with or swim through wild animal enclosures in Asia; and (4) walk with wild animals in Asia and Europe. Given the global prevalence of AVIs in modern zoos and aquaria, and an apparent lack of animal welfare focused research, we provide recommendations to help effectively balance and manage captive wild animal welfare with other primary interconnected goals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6617332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66173322019-07-18 A Global Review of Animal–Visitor Interactions in Modern Zoos and Aquariums and Their Implications for Wild Animal Welfare D’Cruze, Neil Khan, Sophie Carder, Gemma Megson, David Coulthard, Emma Norrey, John Groves, Georgina Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: This study explores the characteristics of animal-visitor Interactions (AVIs) (interactions between people and captive wild animals) in zoos and aquaria across the globe. We reviewed information provided on public websites of institutions that are either direct members of the World Association for Zoos and Aquariums (WAZA) or belong to regional and national associations that have WAZA membership. The opportunity for visitors to interact with wild animals was promoted on the majority of the facilities’ websites. Petting captive wild animals was the most common AVI activity advertised (43%) of facilities, and interaction with mammals was the most advertised taxonomic class (53%). Some activities involving direct contact with wildlife were promoted more commonly than expected (for example, hand feed and ride wild animals, and walk with or swim through wild animal enclosures). Some of the advertised AVIs have the potential to impact animal welfare; in light of this, we provide recommendations to balance and manage captive wild animal welfare in AVIs with other primary interconnected goals. ABSTRACT: We provide an initial insight into the occurrence and characteristics of animal-visitor interactions (AVIs) involving captive wild animals within zoos and aquaria. Using information provided online via official public websites of modern zoos and aquaria, we found that AVIs were provided by the majority of facilities. Our study revealed that a variety of AVI types were being offered. Globally, petting captive wild animals was the most prevalent AVI type advertised (n = 1241 observations, 43% (534) of facilities) and Mammalia was the most advertised taxonomic class (n = 5142; 53% (2739)). We found certain AVI types that were more commonly offered than predicted. These were opportunities to: (1) Hand feed captive wild animals in Asia, North America and Oceania; (2) ride wild animals in Europe and North America; (3) walk with or swim through wild animal enclosures in Asia; and (4) walk with wild animals in Asia and Europe. Given the global prevalence of AVIs in modern zoos and aquaria, and an apparent lack of animal welfare focused research, we provide recommendations to help effectively balance and manage captive wild animal welfare with other primary interconnected goals. MDPI 2019-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6617332/ /pubmed/31181769 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9060332 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
D’Cruze, Neil
Khan, Sophie
Carder, Gemma
Megson, David
Coulthard, Emma
Norrey, John
Groves, Georgina
A Global Review of Animal–Visitor Interactions in Modern Zoos and Aquariums and Their Implications for Wild Animal Welfare
title A Global Review of Animal–Visitor Interactions in Modern Zoos and Aquariums and Their Implications for Wild Animal Welfare
title_full A Global Review of Animal–Visitor Interactions in Modern Zoos and Aquariums and Their Implications for Wild Animal Welfare
title_fullStr A Global Review of Animal–Visitor Interactions in Modern Zoos and Aquariums and Their Implications for Wild Animal Welfare
title_full_unstemmed A Global Review of Animal–Visitor Interactions in Modern Zoos and Aquariums and Their Implications for Wild Animal Welfare
title_short A Global Review of Animal–Visitor Interactions in Modern Zoos and Aquariums and Their Implications for Wild Animal Welfare
title_sort global review of animal–visitor interactions in modern zoos and aquariums and their implications for wild animal welfare
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31181769
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9060332
work_keys_str_mv AT dcruzeneil aglobalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare
AT khansophie aglobalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare
AT cardergemma aglobalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare
AT megsondavid aglobalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare
AT coulthardemma aglobalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare
AT norreyjohn aglobalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare
AT grovesgeorgina aglobalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare
AT dcruzeneil globalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare
AT khansophie globalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare
AT cardergemma globalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare
AT megsondavid globalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare
AT coulthardemma globalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare
AT norreyjohn globalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare
AT grovesgeorgina globalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare