Cargando…
A Global Review of Animal–Visitor Interactions in Modern Zoos and Aquariums and Their Implications for Wild Animal Welfare
SIMPLE SUMMARY: This study explores the characteristics of animal-visitor Interactions (AVIs) (interactions between people and captive wild animals) in zoos and aquaria across the globe. We reviewed information provided on public websites of institutions that are either direct members of the World A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31181769 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9060332 |
_version_ | 1783433668423843840 |
---|---|
author | D’Cruze, Neil Khan, Sophie Carder, Gemma Megson, David Coulthard, Emma Norrey, John Groves, Georgina |
author_facet | D’Cruze, Neil Khan, Sophie Carder, Gemma Megson, David Coulthard, Emma Norrey, John Groves, Georgina |
author_sort | D’Cruze, Neil |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: This study explores the characteristics of animal-visitor Interactions (AVIs) (interactions between people and captive wild animals) in zoos and aquaria across the globe. We reviewed information provided on public websites of institutions that are either direct members of the World Association for Zoos and Aquariums (WAZA) or belong to regional and national associations that have WAZA membership. The opportunity for visitors to interact with wild animals was promoted on the majority of the facilities’ websites. Petting captive wild animals was the most common AVI activity advertised (43%) of facilities, and interaction with mammals was the most advertised taxonomic class (53%). Some activities involving direct contact with wildlife were promoted more commonly than expected (for example, hand feed and ride wild animals, and walk with or swim through wild animal enclosures). Some of the advertised AVIs have the potential to impact animal welfare; in light of this, we provide recommendations to balance and manage captive wild animal welfare in AVIs with other primary interconnected goals. ABSTRACT: We provide an initial insight into the occurrence and characteristics of animal-visitor interactions (AVIs) involving captive wild animals within zoos and aquaria. Using information provided online via official public websites of modern zoos and aquaria, we found that AVIs were provided by the majority of facilities. Our study revealed that a variety of AVI types were being offered. Globally, petting captive wild animals was the most prevalent AVI type advertised (n = 1241 observations, 43% (534) of facilities) and Mammalia was the most advertised taxonomic class (n = 5142; 53% (2739)). We found certain AVI types that were more commonly offered than predicted. These were opportunities to: (1) Hand feed captive wild animals in Asia, North America and Oceania; (2) ride wild animals in Europe and North America; (3) walk with or swim through wild animal enclosures in Asia; and (4) walk with wild animals in Asia and Europe. Given the global prevalence of AVIs in modern zoos and aquaria, and an apparent lack of animal welfare focused research, we provide recommendations to help effectively balance and manage captive wild animal welfare with other primary interconnected goals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6617332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66173322019-07-18 A Global Review of Animal–Visitor Interactions in Modern Zoos and Aquariums and Their Implications for Wild Animal Welfare D’Cruze, Neil Khan, Sophie Carder, Gemma Megson, David Coulthard, Emma Norrey, John Groves, Georgina Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: This study explores the characteristics of animal-visitor Interactions (AVIs) (interactions between people and captive wild animals) in zoos and aquaria across the globe. We reviewed information provided on public websites of institutions that are either direct members of the World Association for Zoos and Aquariums (WAZA) or belong to regional and national associations that have WAZA membership. The opportunity for visitors to interact with wild animals was promoted on the majority of the facilities’ websites. Petting captive wild animals was the most common AVI activity advertised (43%) of facilities, and interaction with mammals was the most advertised taxonomic class (53%). Some activities involving direct contact with wildlife were promoted more commonly than expected (for example, hand feed and ride wild animals, and walk with or swim through wild animal enclosures). Some of the advertised AVIs have the potential to impact animal welfare; in light of this, we provide recommendations to balance and manage captive wild animal welfare in AVIs with other primary interconnected goals. ABSTRACT: We provide an initial insight into the occurrence and characteristics of animal-visitor interactions (AVIs) involving captive wild animals within zoos and aquaria. Using information provided online via official public websites of modern zoos and aquaria, we found that AVIs were provided by the majority of facilities. Our study revealed that a variety of AVI types were being offered. Globally, petting captive wild animals was the most prevalent AVI type advertised (n = 1241 observations, 43% (534) of facilities) and Mammalia was the most advertised taxonomic class (n = 5142; 53% (2739)). We found certain AVI types that were more commonly offered than predicted. These were opportunities to: (1) Hand feed captive wild animals in Asia, North America and Oceania; (2) ride wild animals in Europe and North America; (3) walk with or swim through wild animal enclosures in Asia; and (4) walk with wild animals in Asia and Europe. Given the global prevalence of AVIs in modern zoos and aquaria, and an apparent lack of animal welfare focused research, we provide recommendations to help effectively balance and manage captive wild animal welfare with other primary interconnected goals. MDPI 2019-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6617332/ /pubmed/31181769 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9060332 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article D’Cruze, Neil Khan, Sophie Carder, Gemma Megson, David Coulthard, Emma Norrey, John Groves, Georgina A Global Review of Animal–Visitor Interactions in Modern Zoos and Aquariums and Their Implications for Wild Animal Welfare |
title | A Global Review of Animal–Visitor Interactions in Modern Zoos and Aquariums and Their Implications for Wild Animal Welfare |
title_full | A Global Review of Animal–Visitor Interactions in Modern Zoos and Aquariums and Their Implications for Wild Animal Welfare |
title_fullStr | A Global Review of Animal–Visitor Interactions in Modern Zoos and Aquariums and Their Implications for Wild Animal Welfare |
title_full_unstemmed | A Global Review of Animal–Visitor Interactions in Modern Zoos and Aquariums and Their Implications for Wild Animal Welfare |
title_short | A Global Review of Animal–Visitor Interactions in Modern Zoos and Aquariums and Their Implications for Wild Animal Welfare |
title_sort | global review of animal–visitor interactions in modern zoos and aquariums and their implications for wild animal welfare |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31181769 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9060332 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dcruzeneil aglobalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare AT khansophie aglobalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare AT cardergemma aglobalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare AT megsondavid aglobalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare AT coulthardemma aglobalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare AT norreyjohn aglobalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare AT grovesgeorgina aglobalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare AT dcruzeneil globalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare AT khansophie globalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare AT cardergemma globalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare AT megsondavid globalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare AT coulthardemma globalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare AT norreyjohn globalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare AT grovesgeorgina globalreviewofanimalvisitorinteractionsinmodernzoosandaquariumsandtheirimplicationsforwildanimalwelfare |