Cargando…
Prognostic factors for rural endometrial cancer patients in a population-based cohort
BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer is the second most common cancer among female cancer survivors in the US and is increasing in incidence. Rural endometrial cancer patients experience lower survival rates but the reasons for the lower survival are not known. The aim of this study is to examine whether...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31291920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7262-7 |
_version_ | 1783433721345474560 |
---|---|
author | Blackburn, Brenna E. Soisson, Sean Rowe, Kerry Snyder, John Fraser, Alison Deshmukh, Vikrant Newman, Michael Smith, Ken Herget, Kimberly Kirchhoff, Anne C. Kepka, Deanna Werner, Theresa L. Gaffney, David Mooney, Kathi Hashibe, Mia |
author_facet | Blackburn, Brenna E. Soisson, Sean Rowe, Kerry Snyder, John Fraser, Alison Deshmukh, Vikrant Newman, Michael Smith, Ken Herget, Kimberly Kirchhoff, Anne C. Kepka, Deanna Werner, Theresa L. Gaffney, David Mooney, Kathi Hashibe, Mia |
author_sort | Blackburn, Brenna E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer is the second most common cancer among female cancer survivors in the US and is increasing in incidence. Rural endometrial cancer patients experience lower survival rates but the reasons for the lower survival are not known. The aim of this study is to examine whether prognostic factors are different for rural and urban patients in a population-based cohort. METHODS: Endometrial cancer patients diagnosed 1997-2012 were identified through the Utah Cancer Registry and Utah Population Database. The address at cancer diagnosis was used to classify patients in rural or urban residences. Demographic and cancer-specific characteristics were examined as prognostic factors for both all-cause and endometrial cancer-specific mortality using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: There were 2,994 endometrial cancer patients and 14.1% of these patients lived in rural areas at diagnosis. Rural endometrial cancer patients were older at cancer diagnosis and did not appear to be different in terms of obesity or overweight at cancer diagnosis. There were no differences for treatment or stage at diagnosis although rural patients had higher proportions of higher grade. Age at diagnosis, poverty, education, and histology were significant prognostic factors for all-cause death. Rural patients with more advanced stages of cancer had significantly increased risks of all-cause and endometrial cancer-specific death than urban patients. Rural endometrial cancer patients diagnosed at advanced stage had a 17-fold increase in the risk of all-cause death compared to an 8-fold increase in death for urban patients. CONCLUSIONS: Rural endometrial cancer patients in Utah were older at diagnosis, had higher grade and higher comorbidities. While urban and rural endometrial cancer patients shared many prognostic factors, the risk of mortality is greater among rural patients with advanced stage endometrial cancer. Future studies should examine where patients are receiving treatment and how that impacts their survival and how to reduce the mortality rates of high risk patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6617574 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66175742019-07-18 Prognostic factors for rural endometrial cancer patients in a population-based cohort Blackburn, Brenna E. Soisson, Sean Rowe, Kerry Snyder, John Fraser, Alison Deshmukh, Vikrant Newman, Michael Smith, Ken Herget, Kimberly Kirchhoff, Anne C. Kepka, Deanna Werner, Theresa L. Gaffney, David Mooney, Kathi Hashibe, Mia BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer is the second most common cancer among female cancer survivors in the US and is increasing in incidence. Rural endometrial cancer patients experience lower survival rates but the reasons for the lower survival are not known. The aim of this study is to examine whether prognostic factors are different for rural and urban patients in a population-based cohort. METHODS: Endometrial cancer patients diagnosed 1997-2012 were identified through the Utah Cancer Registry and Utah Population Database. The address at cancer diagnosis was used to classify patients in rural or urban residences. Demographic and cancer-specific characteristics were examined as prognostic factors for both all-cause and endometrial cancer-specific mortality using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: There were 2,994 endometrial cancer patients and 14.1% of these patients lived in rural areas at diagnosis. Rural endometrial cancer patients were older at cancer diagnosis and did not appear to be different in terms of obesity or overweight at cancer diagnosis. There were no differences for treatment or stage at diagnosis although rural patients had higher proportions of higher grade. Age at diagnosis, poverty, education, and histology were significant prognostic factors for all-cause death. Rural patients with more advanced stages of cancer had significantly increased risks of all-cause and endometrial cancer-specific death than urban patients. Rural endometrial cancer patients diagnosed at advanced stage had a 17-fold increase in the risk of all-cause death compared to an 8-fold increase in death for urban patients. CONCLUSIONS: Rural endometrial cancer patients in Utah were older at diagnosis, had higher grade and higher comorbidities. While urban and rural endometrial cancer patients shared many prognostic factors, the risk of mortality is greater among rural patients with advanced stage endometrial cancer. Future studies should examine where patients are receiving treatment and how that impacts their survival and how to reduce the mortality rates of high risk patients. BioMed Central 2019-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6617574/ /pubmed/31291920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7262-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Blackburn, Brenna E. Soisson, Sean Rowe, Kerry Snyder, John Fraser, Alison Deshmukh, Vikrant Newman, Michael Smith, Ken Herget, Kimberly Kirchhoff, Anne C. Kepka, Deanna Werner, Theresa L. Gaffney, David Mooney, Kathi Hashibe, Mia Prognostic factors for rural endometrial cancer patients in a population-based cohort |
title | Prognostic factors for rural endometrial cancer patients in a population-based cohort |
title_full | Prognostic factors for rural endometrial cancer patients in a population-based cohort |
title_fullStr | Prognostic factors for rural endometrial cancer patients in a population-based cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic factors for rural endometrial cancer patients in a population-based cohort |
title_short | Prognostic factors for rural endometrial cancer patients in a population-based cohort |
title_sort | prognostic factors for rural endometrial cancer patients in a population-based cohort |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31291920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7262-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blackburnbrennae prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort AT soissonsean prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort AT rowekerry prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort AT snyderjohn prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort AT fraseralison prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort AT deshmukhvikrant prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort AT newmanmichael prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort AT smithken prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort AT hergetkimberly prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort AT kirchhoffannec prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort AT kepkadeanna prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort AT wernertheresal prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort AT gaffneydavid prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort AT mooneykathi prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort AT hashibemia prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort |