Cargando…

Prognostic factors for rural endometrial cancer patients in a population-based cohort

BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer is the second most common cancer among female cancer survivors in the US and is increasing in incidence. Rural endometrial cancer patients experience lower survival rates but the reasons for the lower survival are not known. The aim of this study is to examine whether...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blackburn, Brenna E., Soisson, Sean, Rowe, Kerry, Snyder, John, Fraser, Alison, Deshmukh, Vikrant, Newman, Michael, Smith, Ken, Herget, Kimberly, Kirchhoff, Anne C., Kepka, Deanna, Werner, Theresa L., Gaffney, David, Mooney, Kathi, Hashibe, Mia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31291920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7262-7
_version_ 1783433721345474560
author Blackburn, Brenna E.
Soisson, Sean
Rowe, Kerry
Snyder, John
Fraser, Alison
Deshmukh, Vikrant
Newman, Michael
Smith, Ken
Herget, Kimberly
Kirchhoff, Anne C.
Kepka, Deanna
Werner, Theresa L.
Gaffney, David
Mooney, Kathi
Hashibe, Mia
author_facet Blackburn, Brenna E.
Soisson, Sean
Rowe, Kerry
Snyder, John
Fraser, Alison
Deshmukh, Vikrant
Newman, Michael
Smith, Ken
Herget, Kimberly
Kirchhoff, Anne C.
Kepka, Deanna
Werner, Theresa L.
Gaffney, David
Mooney, Kathi
Hashibe, Mia
author_sort Blackburn, Brenna E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer is the second most common cancer among female cancer survivors in the US and is increasing in incidence. Rural endometrial cancer patients experience lower survival rates but the reasons for the lower survival are not known. The aim of this study is to examine whether prognostic factors are different for rural and urban patients in a population-based cohort. METHODS: Endometrial cancer patients diagnosed 1997-2012 were identified through the Utah Cancer Registry and Utah Population Database. The address at cancer diagnosis was used to classify patients in rural or urban residences. Demographic and cancer-specific characteristics were examined as prognostic factors for both all-cause and endometrial cancer-specific mortality using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: There were 2,994 endometrial cancer patients and 14.1% of these patients lived in rural areas at diagnosis. Rural endometrial cancer patients were older at cancer diagnosis and did not appear to be different in terms of obesity or overweight at cancer diagnosis. There were no differences for treatment or stage at diagnosis although rural patients had higher proportions of higher grade. Age at diagnosis, poverty, education, and histology were significant prognostic factors for all-cause death. Rural patients with more advanced stages of cancer had significantly increased risks of all-cause and endometrial cancer-specific death than urban patients. Rural endometrial cancer patients diagnosed at advanced stage had a 17-fold increase in the risk of all-cause death compared to an 8-fold increase in death for urban patients. CONCLUSIONS: Rural endometrial cancer patients in Utah were older at diagnosis, had higher grade and higher comorbidities. While urban and rural endometrial cancer patients shared many prognostic factors, the risk of mortality is greater among rural patients with advanced stage endometrial cancer. Future studies should examine where patients are receiving treatment and how that impacts their survival and how to reduce the mortality rates of high risk patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6617574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66175742019-07-18 Prognostic factors for rural endometrial cancer patients in a population-based cohort Blackburn, Brenna E. Soisson, Sean Rowe, Kerry Snyder, John Fraser, Alison Deshmukh, Vikrant Newman, Michael Smith, Ken Herget, Kimberly Kirchhoff, Anne C. Kepka, Deanna Werner, Theresa L. Gaffney, David Mooney, Kathi Hashibe, Mia BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer is the second most common cancer among female cancer survivors in the US and is increasing in incidence. Rural endometrial cancer patients experience lower survival rates but the reasons for the lower survival are not known. The aim of this study is to examine whether prognostic factors are different for rural and urban patients in a population-based cohort. METHODS: Endometrial cancer patients diagnosed 1997-2012 were identified through the Utah Cancer Registry and Utah Population Database. The address at cancer diagnosis was used to classify patients in rural or urban residences. Demographic and cancer-specific characteristics were examined as prognostic factors for both all-cause and endometrial cancer-specific mortality using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: There were 2,994 endometrial cancer patients and 14.1% of these patients lived in rural areas at diagnosis. Rural endometrial cancer patients were older at cancer diagnosis and did not appear to be different in terms of obesity or overweight at cancer diagnosis. There were no differences for treatment or stage at diagnosis although rural patients had higher proportions of higher grade. Age at diagnosis, poverty, education, and histology were significant prognostic factors for all-cause death. Rural patients with more advanced stages of cancer had significantly increased risks of all-cause and endometrial cancer-specific death than urban patients. Rural endometrial cancer patients diagnosed at advanced stage had a 17-fold increase in the risk of all-cause death compared to an 8-fold increase in death for urban patients. CONCLUSIONS: Rural endometrial cancer patients in Utah were older at diagnosis, had higher grade and higher comorbidities. While urban and rural endometrial cancer patients shared many prognostic factors, the risk of mortality is greater among rural patients with advanced stage endometrial cancer. Future studies should examine where patients are receiving treatment and how that impacts their survival and how to reduce the mortality rates of high risk patients. BioMed Central 2019-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6617574/ /pubmed/31291920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7262-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Blackburn, Brenna E.
Soisson, Sean
Rowe, Kerry
Snyder, John
Fraser, Alison
Deshmukh, Vikrant
Newman, Michael
Smith, Ken
Herget, Kimberly
Kirchhoff, Anne C.
Kepka, Deanna
Werner, Theresa L.
Gaffney, David
Mooney, Kathi
Hashibe, Mia
Prognostic factors for rural endometrial cancer patients in a population-based cohort
title Prognostic factors for rural endometrial cancer patients in a population-based cohort
title_full Prognostic factors for rural endometrial cancer patients in a population-based cohort
title_fullStr Prognostic factors for rural endometrial cancer patients in a population-based cohort
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic factors for rural endometrial cancer patients in a population-based cohort
title_short Prognostic factors for rural endometrial cancer patients in a population-based cohort
title_sort prognostic factors for rural endometrial cancer patients in a population-based cohort
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31291920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7262-7
work_keys_str_mv AT blackburnbrennae prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort
AT soissonsean prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort
AT rowekerry prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort
AT snyderjohn prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort
AT fraseralison prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort
AT deshmukhvikrant prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort
AT newmanmichael prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort
AT smithken prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort
AT hergetkimberly prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort
AT kirchhoffannec prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort
AT kepkadeanna prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort
AT wernertheresal prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort
AT gaffneydavid prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort
AT mooneykathi prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort
AT hashibemia prognosticfactorsforruralendometrialcancerpatientsinapopulationbasedcohort