Cargando…

Ovarian function after the use of various hemostatic techniques during treatment for endometrioma: protocol for a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cystectomy is currently considered the gold standard for the treatment of ovarian endometrioma, resulting in an improvement in symptoms, a lower recurrence rate, and a higher pregnancy rate among infertile patients. However, this treatment is not free from risk, since it is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Araujo, Raquel Silveira da Cunha, Maia, Sabina Bastos, Baracat, Clara Micalli Ferruzzi, Lima, Moisés Diogo, Soares, Eduardo Sérgio Sousa, Ribeiro, Helizabet Salomão Abdalla Ayroza, Ribeiro, Paulo Augusto Ayroza Galvão
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31288827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3524-z
_version_ 1783433745850695680
author Araujo, Raquel Silveira da Cunha
Maia, Sabina Bastos
Baracat, Clara Micalli Ferruzzi
Lima, Moisés Diogo
Soares, Eduardo Sérgio Sousa
Ribeiro, Helizabet Salomão Abdalla Ayroza
Ribeiro, Paulo Augusto Ayroza Galvão
author_facet Araujo, Raquel Silveira da Cunha
Maia, Sabina Bastos
Baracat, Clara Micalli Ferruzzi
Lima, Moisés Diogo
Soares, Eduardo Sérgio Sousa
Ribeiro, Helizabet Salomão Abdalla Ayroza
Ribeiro, Paulo Augusto Ayroza Galvão
author_sort Araujo, Raquel Silveira da Cunha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cystectomy is currently considered the gold standard for the treatment of ovarian endometrioma, resulting in an improvement in symptoms, a lower recurrence rate, and a higher pregnancy rate among infertile patients. However, this treatment is not free from risk, since it is associated with a reduction in ovarian reserve. There is still controversy in the literature regarding whether the cause of the reduction in ovarian reserve is due to damage caused by the coagulation energy during hemostasis or whether the procedure itself is the cause of the damage irrespective of the hemostatic method used. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of different hemostatic methods on the ovarian function of women subjected to laparoscopic surgery for ovarian endometrioma. METHODS: An open-label randomized clinical trial to be conducted at the Lauro Wanderley University Hospital between December 2017 and August 2020. Eighty-four patients will be randomly allocated to three groups according to the hemostatic technique used during laparoscopic surgery for ovarian endometrioma: bipolar coagulation; laparoscopic suture; and hemostatic matrix. Ovarian function will be assessed by serum anti-Müllerian hormone measurement and by performing an antral follicle count using ultrasound before surgery and one, three, and six months after surgery. The internal review board of the Medical Sciences Center, Federal University of Paraíba approved the study protocol under reference CAAE 71621717.9.0000.8069. DISCUSSION: Bearing in mind the need for more randomized clinical trials to clarify this issue, we hope to contribute with data that will determine whether there is any difference between hemostatic methods despite the rational use of bipolar energy or whether the procedure itself explains the ovarian damage irrespective of the hemostatic technique used. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NTC03430609. Registered on XX.10/31/2017. ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN11469394. Registered on XX.17/12/2017. Unique Protocol ID: U1111–1203-2508.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6617678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66176782019-07-22 Ovarian function after the use of various hemostatic techniques during treatment for endometrioma: protocol for a randomized clinical trial Araujo, Raquel Silveira da Cunha Maia, Sabina Bastos Baracat, Clara Micalli Ferruzzi Lima, Moisés Diogo Soares, Eduardo Sérgio Sousa Ribeiro, Helizabet Salomão Abdalla Ayroza Ribeiro, Paulo Augusto Ayroza Galvão Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cystectomy is currently considered the gold standard for the treatment of ovarian endometrioma, resulting in an improvement in symptoms, a lower recurrence rate, and a higher pregnancy rate among infertile patients. However, this treatment is not free from risk, since it is associated with a reduction in ovarian reserve. There is still controversy in the literature regarding whether the cause of the reduction in ovarian reserve is due to damage caused by the coagulation energy during hemostasis or whether the procedure itself is the cause of the damage irrespective of the hemostatic method used. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of different hemostatic methods on the ovarian function of women subjected to laparoscopic surgery for ovarian endometrioma. METHODS: An open-label randomized clinical trial to be conducted at the Lauro Wanderley University Hospital between December 2017 and August 2020. Eighty-four patients will be randomly allocated to three groups according to the hemostatic technique used during laparoscopic surgery for ovarian endometrioma: bipolar coagulation; laparoscopic suture; and hemostatic matrix. Ovarian function will be assessed by serum anti-Müllerian hormone measurement and by performing an antral follicle count using ultrasound before surgery and one, three, and six months after surgery. The internal review board of the Medical Sciences Center, Federal University of Paraíba approved the study protocol under reference CAAE 71621717.9.0000.8069. DISCUSSION: Bearing in mind the need for more randomized clinical trials to clarify this issue, we hope to contribute with data that will determine whether there is any difference between hemostatic methods despite the rational use of bipolar energy or whether the procedure itself explains the ovarian damage irrespective of the hemostatic technique used. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NTC03430609. Registered on XX.10/31/2017. ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN11469394. Registered on XX.17/12/2017. Unique Protocol ID: U1111–1203-2508. BioMed Central 2019-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6617678/ /pubmed/31288827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3524-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Araujo, Raquel Silveira da Cunha
Maia, Sabina Bastos
Baracat, Clara Micalli Ferruzzi
Lima, Moisés Diogo
Soares, Eduardo Sérgio Sousa
Ribeiro, Helizabet Salomão Abdalla Ayroza
Ribeiro, Paulo Augusto Ayroza Galvão
Ovarian function after the use of various hemostatic techniques during treatment for endometrioma: protocol for a randomized clinical trial
title Ovarian function after the use of various hemostatic techniques during treatment for endometrioma: protocol for a randomized clinical trial
title_full Ovarian function after the use of various hemostatic techniques during treatment for endometrioma: protocol for a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Ovarian function after the use of various hemostatic techniques during treatment for endometrioma: protocol for a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Ovarian function after the use of various hemostatic techniques during treatment for endometrioma: protocol for a randomized clinical trial
title_short Ovarian function after the use of various hemostatic techniques during treatment for endometrioma: protocol for a randomized clinical trial
title_sort ovarian function after the use of various hemostatic techniques during treatment for endometrioma: protocol for a randomized clinical trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31288827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3524-z
work_keys_str_mv AT araujoraquelsilveiradacunha ovarianfunctionaftertheuseofvarioushemostatictechniquesduringtreatmentforendometriomaprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT maiasabinabastos ovarianfunctionaftertheuseofvarioushemostatictechniquesduringtreatmentforendometriomaprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT baracatclaramicalliferruzzi ovarianfunctionaftertheuseofvarioushemostatictechniquesduringtreatmentforendometriomaprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT limamoisesdiogo ovarianfunctionaftertheuseofvarioushemostatictechniquesduringtreatmentforendometriomaprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT soareseduardosergiosousa ovarianfunctionaftertheuseofvarioushemostatictechniquesduringtreatmentforendometriomaprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ribeirohelizabetsalomaoabdallaayroza ovarianfunctionaftertheuseofvarioushemostatictechniquesduringtreatmentforendometriomaprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ribeiropauloaugustoayrozagalvao ovarianfunctionaftertheuseofvarioushemostatictechniquesduringtreatmentforendometriomaprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrial