Cargando…

Comparison of Different Strategies to Measure Medication Adherence via Claims Data in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

Medication adherence correlates with morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), but is difficult to assess. We conducted a retrospective methodological cohort study in 3,808 CHF patients, calculating adherence as proportion of days covered (PDC) utilizing claims data from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ihle, Peter, Krueger, Katrin, Schubert, Ingrid, Griese‐Mammen, Nina, Parrau, Natalie, Laufs, Ulrich, Schulz, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30697693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1378
_version_ 1783433815617699840
author Ihle, Peter
Krueger, Katrin
Schubert, Ingrid
Griese‐Mammen, Nina
Parrau, Natalie
Laufs, Ulrich
Schulz, Martin
author_facet Ihle, Peter
Krueger, Katrin
Schubert, Ingrid
Griese‐Mammen, Nina
Parrau, Natalie
Laufs, Ulrich
Schulz, Martin
author_sort Ihle, Peter
collection PubMed
description Medication adherence correlates with morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), but is difficult to assess. We conducted a retrospective methodological cohort study in 3,808 CHF patients, calculating adherence as proportion of days covered (PDC) utilizing claims data from 2010 to 2015. We aimed to compare different parameters’ influence on the PDC of elderly CHF patients exemplifying a complex chronic disease. Investigated parameters were the assumed prescribed daily dose (PDD), stockpiling, and periods of hospital stay. Thereby, we investigated a new approach using the PDD assigned to different percentiles. The different dose assumptions had the biggest influence on the PDC, with variations from 41.9% to 83.7%. Stockpiling and hospital stays increased the values slightly. These results queries that a reliable PDC can be calculated with an assumed PDD. Hence, results based on an assumed PDD have to be interpreted carefully and should be presented with sensitivity analyses to show the PDC's possible range.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6617982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66179822019-07-16 Comparison of Different Strategies to Measure Medication Adherence via Claims Data in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure Ihle, Peter Krueger, Katrin Schubert, Ingrid Griese‐Mammen, Nina Parrau, Natalie Laufs, Ulrich Schulz, Martin Clin Pharmacol Ther Research Medication adherence correlates with morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), but is difficult to assess. We conducted a retrospective methodological cohort study in 3,808 CHF patients, calculating adherence as proportion of days covered (PDC) utilizing claims data from 2010 to 2015. We aimed to compare different parameters’ influence on the PDC of elderly CHF patients exemplifying a complex chronic disease. Investigated parameters were the assumed prescribed daily dose (PDD), stockpiling, and periods of hospital stay. Thereby, we investigated a new approach using the PDD assigned to different percentiles. The different dose assumptions had the biggest influence on the PDC, with variations from 41.9% to 83.7%. Stockpiling and hospital stays increased the values slightly. These results queries that a reliable PDC can be calculated with an assumed PDD. Hence, results based on an assumed PDD have to be interpreted carefully and should be presented with sensitivity analyses to show the PDC's possible range. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-12 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6617982/ /pubmed/30697693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1378 Text en © 2019 The Authors Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research
Ihle, Peter
Krueger, Katrin
Schubert, Ingrid
Griese‐Mammen, Nina
Parrau, Natalie
Laufs, Ulrich
Schulz, Martin
Comparison of Different Strategies to Measure Medication Adherence via Claims Data in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
title Comparison of Different Strategies to Measure Medication Adherence via Claims Data in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
title_full Comparison of Different Strategies to Measure Medication Adherence via Claims Data in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
title_fullStr Comparison of Different Strategies to Measure Medication Adherence via Claims Data in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Different Strategies to Measure Medication Adherence via Claims Data in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
title_short Comparison of Different Strategies to Measure Medication Adherence via Claims Data in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
title_sort comparison of different strategies to measure medication adherence via claims data in patients with chronic heart failure
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30697693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1378
work_keys_str_mv AT ihlepeter comparisonofdifferentstrategiestomeasuremedicationadherenceviaclaimsdatainpatientswithchronicheartfailure
AT kruegerkatrin comparisonofdifferentstrategiestomeasuremedicationadherenceviaclaimsdatainpatientswithchronicheartfailure
AT schubertingrid comparisonofdifferentstrategiestomeasuremedicationadherenceviaclaimsdatainpatientswithchronicheartfailure
AT griesemammennina comparisonofdifferentstrategiestomeasuremedicationadherenceviaclaimsdatainpatientswithchronicheartfailure
AT parraunatalie comparisonofdifferentstrategiestomeasuremedicationadherenceviaclaimsdatainpatientswithchronicheartfailure
AT laufsulrich comparisonofdifferentstrategiestomeasuremedicationadherenceviaclaimsdatainpatientswithchronicheartfailure
AT schulzmartin comparisonofdifferentstrategiestomeasuremedicationadherenceviaclaimsdatainpatientswithchronicheartfailure