Cargando…
The working alliance in stuttering treatment: a neglected variable?
BACKGROUND: Multiple factors can influence the working alliance and treatment outcome in speech and language therapy. The ‘working alliance’ is an important concept in treatment and can be described as the degree to which a treatment dyad is engaged in collaborative, purposive work. To date, relativ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30866151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12465 |
_version_ | 1783433819420884992 |
---|---|
author | Sønsterud, Hilda Kirmess, Melanie Howells, Kirsten Ward, David Feragen, Kristin Billaud Halvorsen, Margrethe Seeger |
author_facet | Sønsterud, Hilda Kirmess, Melanie Howells, Kirsten Ward, David Feragen, Kristin Billaud Halvorsen, Margrethe Seeger |
author_sort | Sønsterud, Hilda |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Multiple factors can influence the working alliance and treatment outcome in speech and language therapy. The ‘working alliance’ is an important concept in treatment and can be described as the degree to which a treatment dyad is engaged in collaborative, purposive work. To date, relatively little attention has been paid to this concept within speech and language treatment in general, and within stuttering treatment research in particular. AIMS: To investigate the role of the working alliance within stuttering treatment, and to evaluate whether the quality of the working alliance correlated with clients’ concept of motivation and treatment outcomes 6 months post‐therapy. METHODS & PROCEDURES: Eighteen adults (21‐61 years) participated in this multiple single‐case treatment study, with treatment facilitated by an experienced speech and language therapist. The working alliance was investigated using the Working Alliance Inventory—Short Version Revised (WAI‐SR), an Extended version of the Client Preferences for Stuttering Treatment (CPST‐E), the Overall Assessment of Speakers’ Experience of Stuttering—Adult version (OASES‐A), the Wright & Ayre Stuttering Self‐Rating Profile (WASSP) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Analyses demonstrated significant associations between the working alliance and client motivation (r = 0.781) and treatment outcomes (r = 0.644) 6 months post‐treatment. The association between client‐led goals and therapy tasks appeared particularly important. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: : The working alliance between speech and language therapists and persons who stutter matters. Within the alliance, the level of client–clinician agreement on treatment goals and therapy tasks may be of greater importance than the bond between client and clinician. Further research with greater numbers of participants is warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6617998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66179982019-07-22 The working alliance in stuttering treatment: a neglected variable? Sønsterud, Hilda Kirmess, Melanie Howells, Kirsten Ward, David Feragen, Kristin Billaud Halvorsen, Margrethe Seeger Int J Lang Commun Disord Research Reports BACKGROUND: Multiple factors can influence the working alliance and treatment outcome in speech and language therapy. The ‘working alliance’ is an important concept in treatment and can be described as the degree to which a treatment dyad is engaged in collaborative, purposive work. To date, relatively little attention has been paid to this concept within speech and language treatment in general, and within stuttering treatment research in particular. AIMS: To investigate the role of the working alliance within stuttering treatment, and to evaluate whether the quality of the working alliance correlated with clients’ concept of motivation and treatment outcomes 6 months post‐therapy. METHODS & PROCEDURES: Eighteen adults (21‐61 years) participated in this multiple single‐case treatment study, with treatment facilitated by an experienced speech and language therapist. The working alliance was investigated using the Working Alliance Inventory—Short Version Revised (WAI‐SR), an Extended version of the Client Preferences for Stuttering Treatment (CPST‐E), the Overall Assessment of Speakers’ Experience of Stuttering—Adult version (OASES‐A), the Wright & Ayre Stuttering Self‐Rating Profile (WASSP) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Analyses demonstrated significant associations between the working alliance and client motivation (r = 0.781) and treatment outcomes (r = 0.644) 6 months post‐treatment. The association between client‐led goals and therapy tasks appeared particularly important. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: : The working alliance between speech and language therapists and persons who stutter matters. Within the alliance, the level of client–clinician agreement on treatment goals and therapy tasks may be of greater importance than the bond between client and clinician. Further research with greater numbers of participants is warranted. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-13 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6617998/ /pubmed/30866151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12465 Text en © 2019 The Authors International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Reports Sønsterud, Hilda Kirmess, Melanie Howells, Kirsten Ward, David Feragen, Kristin Billaud Halvorsen, Margrethe Seeger The working alliance in stuttering treatment: a neglected variable? |
title | The working alliance in stuttering treatment: a neglected variable? |
title_full | The working alliance in stuttering treatment: a neglected variable? |
title_fullStr | The working alliance in stuttering treatment: a neglected variable? |
title_full_unstemmed | The working alliance in stuttering treatment: a neglected variable? |
title_short | The working alliance in stuttering treatment: a neglected variable? |
title_sort | working alliance in stuttering treatment: a neglected variable? |
topic | Research Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30866151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12465 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sønsterudhilda theworkingallianceinstutteringtreatmentaneglectedvariable AT kirmessmelanie theworkingallianceinstutteringtreatmentaneglectedvariable AT howellskirsten theworkingallianceinstutteringtreatmentaneglectedvariable AT warddavid theworkingallianceinstutteringtreatmentaneglectedvariable AT feragenkristinbillaud theworkingallianceinstutteringtreatmentaneglectedvariable AT halvorsenmargretheseeger theworkingallianceinstutteringtreatmentaneglectedvariable AT sønsterudhilda workingallianceinstutteringtreatmentaneglectedvariable AT kirmessmelanie workingallianceinstutteringtreatmentaneglectedvariable AT howellskirsten workingallianceinstutteringtreatmentaneglectedvariable AT warddavid workingallianceinstutteringtreatmentaneglectedvariable AT feragenkristinbillaud workingallianceinstutteringtreatmentaneglectedvariable AT halvorsenmargretheseeger workingallianceinstutteringtreatmentaneglectedvariable |