Cargando…
Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix
INTRODUCTION: When women with a previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix have an indication for delivery, the choice is to induce labor or to perform a cesarean section. This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of a balloon catheter as a method of induction of labor in women...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30723900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13558 |
_version_ | 1783433822058053632 |
---|---|
author | Huisman, Claartje M. A. ten Eikelder, Mieke L. G. Mast, Kelly Oude Rengerink, Katrien Jozwiak, Marta van Dunné, Frédérique Duvekot, Johannes J. van Eyck, Jim Gaugler‐Senden, Ingrid de Groot, Christianne J. M. Franssen, Maureen T. M. van Gemund, Nicolette Langenveld, Josje de Leeuw, Jan Willem Oude Lohuis, Eefje J. Oudijk, Martijn A. Papatsonis, Dimitri van Pampus, Mariëlle Porath, Martina Rombout‐de Weerd, Sabina van Roosmalen, Jos J. van der Salm, Paulien C. M. Scheepers, Hubertina C. J. Sikkema, Marko J. Sporken, Jan Stigter, Rob H. van Wijngaarden, Wim J. Woiski, Mallory Mol, Ben Willem J. Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M. |
author_facet | Huisman, Claartje M. A. ten Eikelder, Mieke L. G. Mast, Kelly Oude Rengerink, Katrien Jozwiak, Marta van Dunné, Frédérique Duvekot, Johannes J. van Eyck, Jim Gaugler‐Senden, Ingrid de Groot, Christianne J. M. Franssen, Maureen T. M. van Gemund, Nicolette Langenveld, Josje de Leeuw, Jan Willem Oude Lohuis, Eefje J. Oudijk, Martijn A. Papatsonis, Dimitri van Pampus, Mariëlle Porath, Martina Rombout‐de Weerd, Sabina van Roosmalen, Jos J. van der Salm, Paulien C. M. Scheepers, Hubertina C. J. Sikkema, Marko J. Sporken, Jan Stigter, Rob H. van Wijngaarden, Wim J. Woiski, Mallory Mol, Ben Willem J. Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M. |
author_sort | Huisman, Claartje M. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: When women with a previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix have an indication for delivery, the choice is to induce labor or to perform a cesarean section. This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of a balloon catheter as a method of induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix compared with an elective repeat cesarean section. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study in 51 hospitals in the Netherlands on term women with one previous cesarean section, a live singleton fetus in cephalic position, an unfavorable cervix and an indication for delivery. We recorded obstetric, maternal and neonatal characteristics. We compared the outcome of women who were induced with a balloon catheter with the outcome of women who delivered by elective repeat cesarean section. Main outcomes were maternal and neonatal morbidity. Mode of delivery was a secondary outcome for women who were induced. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were calculated using logistic regression, adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Analysis was performed on 993 women who were induced and 321 women who had a repeat cesarean section (August 2011 until September 2012). Among the women who were induced, 560 (56.4%) delivered vaginally and 11 (1.1%) sustained a uterine rupture. Composite adverse maternal outcome (uterine rupture, severe postpartum hemorrhage or postpartum infection) occurred in 73 (7.4%) in the balloon and 14 (4.5%) women in the repeat cesarean section group (aOR 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85‐2.96). Composite adverse neonatal outcome (Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes or umbilical pH <7.10) occurred in 57 (5.7%) and 10 (3.2%) neonates, respectively (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 0.87‐3.48). Women who were induced had a shorter postpartum admission time (2.0 vs 3.0 days (P < 0.0001)). CONCLUSIONS: In women with a previous cesarean section and a need for delivery, induction of labor with a balloon catheter does not result in a significant increase in adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes as compared with planned cesarean section. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6618009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66180092019-07-22 Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix Huisman, Claartje M. A. ten Eikelder, Mieke L. G. Mast, Kelly Oude Rengerink, Katrien Jozwiak, Marta van Dunné, Frédérique Duvekot, Johannes J. van Eyck, Jim Gaugler‐Senden, Ingrid de Groot, Christianne J. M. Franssen, Maureen T. M. van Gemund, Nicolette Langenveld, Josje de Leeuw, Jan Willem Oude Lohuis, Eefje J. Oudijk, Martijn A. Papatsonis, Dimitri van Pampus, Mariëlle Porath, Martina Rombout‐de Weerd, Sabina van Roosmalen, Jos J. van der Salm, Paulien C. M. Scheepers, Hubertina C. J. Sikkema, Marko J. Sporken, Jan Stigter, Rob H. van Wijngaarden, Wim J. Woiski, Mallory Mol, Ben Willem J. Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Birth INTRODUCTION: When women with a previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix have an indication for delivery, the choice is to induce labor or to perform a cesarean section. This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of a balloon catheter as a method of induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix compared with an elective repeat cesarean section. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study in 51 hospitals in the Netherlands on term women with one previous cesarean section, a live singleton fetus in cephalic position, an unfavorable cervix and an indication for delivery. We recorded obstetric, maternal and neonatal characteristics. We compared the outcome of women who were induced with a balloon catheter with the outcome of women who delivered by elective repeat cesarean section. Main outcomes were maternal and neonatal morbidity. Mode of delivery was a secondary outcome for women who were induced. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were calculated using logistic regression, adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Analysis was performed on 993 women who were induced and 321 women who had a repeat cesarean section (August 2011 until September 2012). Among the women who were induced, 560 (56.4%) delivered vaginally and 11 (1.1%) sustained a uterine rupture. Composite adverse maternal outcome (uterine rupture, severe postpartum hemorrhage or postpartum infection) occurred in 73 (7.4%) in the balloon and 14 (4.5%) women in the repeat cesarean section group (aOR 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85‐2.96). Composite adverse neonatal outcome (Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes or umbilical pH <7.10) occurred in 57 (5.7%) and 10 (3.2%) neonates, respectively (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 0.87‐3.48). Women who were induced had a shorter postpartum admission time (2.0 vs 3.0 days (P < 0.0001)). CONCLUSIONS: In women with a previous cesarean section and a need for delivery, induction of labor with a balloon catheter does not result in a significant increase in adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes as compared with planned cesarean section. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-07 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6618009/ /pubmed/30723900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13558 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG) This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Birth Huisman, Claartje M. A. ten Eikelder, Mieke L. G. Mast, Kelly Oude Rengerink, Katrien Jozwiak, Marta van Dunné, Frédérique Duvekot, Johannes J. van Eyck, Jim Gaugler‐Senden, Ingrid de Groot, Christianne J. M. Franssen, Maureen T. M. van Gemund, Nicolette Langenveld, Josje de Leeuw, Jan Willem Oude Lohuis, Eefje J. Oudijk, Martijn A. Papatsonis, Dimitri van Pampus, Mariëlle Porath, Martina Rombout‐de Weerd, Sabina van Roosmalen, Jos J. van der Salm, Paulien C. M. Scheepers, Hubertina C. J. Sikkema, Marko J. Sporken, Jan Stigter, Rob H. van Wijngaarden, Wim J. Woiski, Mallory Mol, Ben Willem J. Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M. Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix |
title | Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix |
title_full | Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix |
title_fullStr | Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix |
title_full_unstemmed | Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix |
title_short | Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix |
title_sort | balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix |
topic | Birth |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30723900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13558 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huismanclaartjema ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT teneikeldermiekelg ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT mastkelly ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT ouderengerinkkatrien ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT jozwiakmarta ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT vandunnefrederique ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT duvekotjohannesj ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT vaneyckjim ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT gauglersendeningrid ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT degrootchristiannejm ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT franssenmaureentm ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT vangemundnicolette ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT langenveldjosje ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT deleeuwjanwillem ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT oudelohuiseefjej ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT oudijkmartijna ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT papatsonisdimitri ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT vanpampusmarielle ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT porathmartina ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT romboutdeweerdsabina ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT vanroosmalenjosj ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT vandersalmpauliencm ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT scheepershubertinacj ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT sikkemamarkoj ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT sporkenjan ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT stigterrobh ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT vanwijngaardenwimj ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT woiskimallory ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT molbenwillemj ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT bloemenkampkittywm ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix AT ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix |