Cargando…

Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix

INTRODUCTION: When women with a previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix have an indication for delivery, the choice is to induce labor or to perform a cesarean section. This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of a balloon catheter as a method of induction of labor in women...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huisman, Claartje M. A., ten Eikelder, Mieke L. G., Mast, Kelly, Oude Rengerink, Katrien, Jozwiak, Marta, van Dunné, Frédérique, Duvekot, Johannes J., van Eyck, Jim, Gaugler‐Senden, Ingrid, de Groot, Christianne J. M., Franssen, Maureen T. M., van Gemund, Nicolette, Langenveld, Josje, de Leeuw, Jan Willem, Oude Lohuis, Eefje J., Oudijk, Martijn A., Papatsonis, Dimitri, van Pampus, Mariëlle, Porath, Martina, Rombout‐de Weerd, Sabina, van Roosmalen, Jos J., van der Salm, Paulien C. M., Scheepers, Hubertina C. J., Sikkema, Marko J., Sporken, Jan, Stigter, Rob H., van Wijngaarden, Wim J., Woiski, Mallory, Mol, Ben Willem J., Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30723900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13558
_version_ 1783433822058053632
author Huisman, Claartje M. A.
ten Eikelder, Mieke L. G.
Mast, Kelly
Oude Rengerink, Katrien
Jozwiak, Marta
van Dunné, Frédérique
Duvekot, Johannes J.
van Eyck, Jim
Gaugler‐Senden, Ingrid
de Groot, Christianne J. M.
Franssen, Maureen T. M.
van Gemund, Nicolette
Langenveld, Josje
de Leeuw, Jan Willem
Oude Lohuis, Eefje J.
Oudijk, Martijn A.
Papatsonis, Dimitri
van Pampus, Mariëlle
Porath, Martina
Rombout‐de Weerd, Sabina
van Roosmalen, Jos J.
van der Salm, Paulien C. M.
Scheepers, Hubertina C. J.
Sikkema, Marko J.
Sporken, Jan
Stigter, Rob H.
van Wijngaarden, Wim J.
Woiski, Mallory
Mol, Ben Willem J.
Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M.
author_facet Huisman, Claartje M. A.
ten Eikelder, Mieke L. G.
Mast, Kelly
Oude Rengerink, Katrien
Jozwiak, Marta
van Dunné, Frédérique
Duvekot, Johannes J.
van Eyck, Jim
Gaugler‐Senden, Ingrid
de Groot, Christianne J. M.
Franssen, Maureen T. M.
van Gemund, Nicolette
Langenveld, Josje
de Leeuw, Jan Willem
Oude Lohuis, Eefje J.
Oudijk, Martijn A.
Papatsonis, Dimitri
van Pampus, Mariëlle
Porath, Martina
Rombout‐de Weerd, Sabina
van Roosmalen, Jos J.
van der Salm, Paulien C. M.
Scheepers, Hubertina C. J.
Sikkema, Marko J.
Sporken, Jan
Stigter, Rob H.
van Wijngaarden, Wim J.
Woiski, Mallory
Mol, Ben Willem J.
Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M.
author_sort Huisman, Claartje M. A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: When women with a previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix have an indication for delivery, the choice is to induce labor or to perform a cesarean section. This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of a balloon catheter as a method of induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix compared with an elective repeat cesarean section. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study in 51 hospitals in the Netherlands on term women with one previous cesarean section, a live singleton fetus in cephalic position, an unfavorable cervix and an indication for delivery. We recorded obstetric, maternal and neonatal characteristics. We compared the outcome of women who were induced with a balloon catheter with the outcome of women who delivered by elective repeat cesarean section. Main outcomes were maternal and neonatal morbidity. Mode of delivery was a secondary outcome for women who were induced. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were calculated using logistic regression, adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Analysis was performed on 993 women who were induced and 321 women who had a repeat cesarean section (August 2011 until September 2012). Among the women who were induced, 560 (56.4%) delivered vaginally and 11 (1.1%) sustained a uterine rupture. Composite adverse maternal outcome (uterine rupture, severe postpartum hemorrhage or postpartum infection) occurred in 73 (7.4%) in the balloon and 14 (4.5%) women in the repeat cesarean section group (aOR 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85‐2.96). Composite adverse neonatal outcome (Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes or umbilical pH <7.10) occurred in 57 (5.7%) and 10 (3.2%) neonates, respectively (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 0.87‐3.48). Women who were induced had a shorter postpartum admission time (2.0 vs 3.0 days (P < 0.0001)). CONCLUSIONS: In women with a previous cesarean section and a need for delivery, induction of labor with a balloon catheter does not result in a significant increase in adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes as compared with planned cesarean section.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6618009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66180092019-07-22 Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix Huisman, Claartje M. A. ten Eikelder, Mieke L. G. Mast, Kelly Oude Rengerink, Katrien Jozwiak, Marta van Dunné, Frédérique Duvekot, Johannes J. van Eyck, Jim Gaugler‐Senden, Ingrid de Groot, Christianne J. M. Franssen, Maureen T. M. van Gemund, Nicolette Langenveld, Josje de Leeuw, Jan Willem Oude Lohuis, Eefje J. Oudijk, Martijn A. Papatsonis, Dimitri van Pampus, Mariëlle Porath, Martina Rombout‐de Weerd, Sabina van Roosmalen, Jos J. van der Salm, Paulien C. M. Scheepers, Hubertina C. J. Sikkema, Marko J. Sporken, Jan Stigter, Rob H. van Wijngaarden, Wim J. Woiski, Mallory Mol, Ben Willem J. Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Birth INTRODUCTION: When women with a previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix have an indication for delivery, the choice is to induce labor or to perform a cesarean section. This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of a balloon catheter as a method of induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix compared with an elective repeat cesarean section. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study in 51 hospitals in the Netherlands on term women with one previous cesarean section, a live singleton fetus in cephalic position, an unfavorable cervix and an indication for delivery. We recorded obstetric, maternal and neonatal characteristics. We compared the outcome of women who were induced with a balloon catheter with the outcome of women who delivered by elective repeat cesarean section. Main outcomes were maternal and neonatal morbidity. Mode of delivery was a secondary outcome for women who were induced. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were calculated using logistic regression, adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Analysis was performed on 993 women who were induced and 321 women who had a repeat cesarean section (August 2011 until September 2012). Among the women who were induced, 560 (56.4%) delivered vaginally and 11 (1.1%) sustained a uterine rupture. Composite adverse maternal outcome (uterine rupture, severe postpartum hemorrhage or postpartum infection) occurred in 73 (7.4%) in the balloon and 14 (4.5%) women in the repeat cesarean section group (aOR 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85‐2.96). Composite adverse neonatal outcome (Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes or umbilical pH <7.10) occurred in 57 (5.7%) and 10 (3.2%) neonates, respectively (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 0.87‐3.48). Women who were induced had a shorter postpartum admission time (2.0 vs 3.0 days (P < 0.0001)). CONCLUSIONS: In women with a previous cesarean section and a need for delivery, induction of labor with a balloon catheter does not result in a significant increase in adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes as compared with planned cesarean section. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-07 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6618009/ /pubmed/30723900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13558 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG) This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Birth
Huisman, Claartje M. A.
ten Eikelder, Mieke L. G.
Mast, Kelly
Oude Rengerink, Katrien
Jozwiak, Marta
van Dunné, Frédérique
Duvekot, Johannes J.
van Eyck, Jim
Gaugler‐Senden, Ingrid
de Groot, Christianne J. M.
Franssen, Maureen T. M.
van Gemund, Nicolette
Langenveld, Josje
de Leeuw, Jan Willem
Oude Lohuis, Eefje J.
Oudijk, Martijn A.
Papatsonis, Dimitri
van Pampus, Mariëlle
Porath, Martina
Rombout‐de Weerd, Sabina
van Roosmalen, Jos J.
van der Salm, Paulien C. M.
Scheepers, Hubertina C. J.
Sikkema, Marko J.
Sporken, Jan
Stigter, Rob H.
van Wijngaarden, Wim J.
Woiski, Mallory
Mol, Ben Willem J.
Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M.
Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix
title Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix
title_full Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix
title_fullStr Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix
title_full_unstemmed Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix
title_short Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix
title_sort balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix
topic Birth
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30723900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13558
work_keys_str_mv AT huismanclaartjema ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT teneikeldermiekelg ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT mastkelly ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT ouderengerinkkatrien ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT jozwiakmarta ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT vandunnefrederique ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT duvekotjohannesj ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT vaneyckjim ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT gauglersendeningrid ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT degrootchristiannejm ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT franssenmaureentm ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT vangemundnicolette ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT langenveldjosje ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT deleeuwjanwillem ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT oudelohuiseefjej ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT oudijkmartijna ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT papatsonisdimitri ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT vanpampusmarielle ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT porathmartina ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT romboutdeweerdsabina ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT vanroosmalenjosj ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT vandersalmpauliencm ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT scheepershubertinacj ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT sikkemamarkoj ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT sporkenjan ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT stigterrobh ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT vanwijngaardenwimj ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT woiskimallory ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT molbenwillemj ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT bloemenkampkittywm ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix
AT ballooncatheterforinductionoflaborinwomenwithonepreviouscesareanandanunfavorablecervix