Cargando…
Single‐port laparoscopic‐assisted ovariohysterectomy with a modified glove‐port technique in dogs
OBJECTIVE: To describe a single‐port laparoscopic‐assisted ovariohysterectomy (LOHE) with a modified glove‐port technique in dogs and compare it with previously published laparoscopic techniques for LOHE in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study and technique description. ANIMALS: Forty‐two...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13242 |
_version_ | 1783433834791960576 |
---|---|
author | Bydzovsky, Nina D. Bockstahler, Barbara Dupré, Gilles |
author_facet | Bydzovsky, Nina D. Bockstahler, Barbara Dupré, Gilles |
author_sort | Bydzovsky, Nina D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To describe a single‐port laparoscopic‐assisted ovariohysterectomy (LOHE) with a modified glove‐port technique in dogs and compare it with previously published laparoscopic techniques for LOHE in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study and technique description. ANIMALS: Forty‐two healthy female dogs. METHODS: Laparoscopic‐assisted ovariohysterectomy was performed with a custom‐made single‐port device. The total duration of surgery from first incision to skin closure was compared with previously published durations of LOHE in dogs. Short‐term complications were recorded. RESULTS: The median total duration of surgery was 24 minutes (range, 17.5–39.5; mean, 25.73; SD, 6.12), which was shorter than that described in most previously reported studies of LOHE in dogs (range, 20.8 ± 4.00–60.0 ± 18.45 minutes; P < .001). Intraoperative complications were minor, but wound complications occurred in 12 of 42 (29%) dogs. CONCLUSION: Single‐port LOHE with the glove‐port technique in combination with a wound retractor and nonarticulated instruments was completed in all dogs. This technique was faster than what has been previously reported for other LOHE, but local wound complications were common. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The glove‐port technique described here offers a low‐cost alternative to other commercially available single‐port devices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6618065 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66180652019-07-22 Single‐port laparoscopic‐assisted ovariohysterectomy with a modified glove‐port technique in dogs Bydzovsky, Nina D. Bockstahler, Barbara Dupré, Gilles Vet Surg Original Articles ‐ Clinical OBJECTIVE: To describe a single‐port laparoscopic‐assisted ovariohysterectomy (LOHE) with a modified glove‐port technique in dogs and compare it with previously published laparoscopic techniques for LOHE in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study and technique description. ANIMALS: Forty‐two healthy female dogs. METHODS: Laparoscopic‐assisted ovariohysterectomy was performed with a custom‐made single‐port device. The total duration of surgery from first incision to skin closure was compared with previously published durations of LOHE in dogs. Short‐term complications were recorded. RESULTS: The median total duration of surgery was 24 minutes (range, 17.5–39.5; mean, 25.73; SD, 6.12), which was shorter than that described in most previously reported studies of LOHE in dogs (range, 20.8 ± 4.00–60.0 ± 18.45 minutes; P < .001). Intraoperative complications were minor, but wound complications occurred in 12 of 42 (29%) dogs. CONCLUSION: Single‐port LOHE with the glove‐port technique in combination with a wound retractor and nonarticulated instruments was completed in all dogs. This technique was faster than what has been previously reported for other LOHE, but local wound complications were common. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The glove‐port technique described here offers a low‐cost alternative to other commercially available single‐port devices. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-06-03 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6618065/ /pubmed/31161631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13242 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Veterinary Surgery published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Veterinary Surgeons. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles ‐ Clinical Bydzovsky, Nina D. Bockstahler, Barbara Dupré, Gilles Single‐port laparoscopic‐assisted ovariohysterectomy with a modified glove‐port technique in dogs |
title | Single‐port laparoscopic‐assisted ovariohysterectomy with a modified glove‐port technique in dogs |
title_full | Single‐port laparoscopic‐assisted ovariohysterectomy with a modified glove‐port technique in dogs |
title_fullStr | Single‐port laparoscopic‐assisted ovariohysterectomy with a modified glove‐port technique in dogs |
title_full_unstemmed | Single‐port laparoscopic‐assisted ovariohysterectomy with a modified glove‐port technique in dogs |
title_short | Single‐port laparoscopic‐assisted ovariohysterectomy with a modified glove‐port technique in dogs |
title_sort | single‐port laparoscopic‐assisted ovariohysterectomy with a modified glove‐port technique in dogs |
topic | Original Articles ‐ Clinical |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13242 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bydzovskyninad singleportlaparoscopicassistedovariohysterectomywithamodifiedgloveporttechniqueindogs AT bockstahlerbarbara singleportlaparoscopicassistedovariohysterectomywithamodifiedgloveporttechniqueindogs AT dupregilles singleportlaparoscopicassistedovariohysterectomywithamodifiedgloveporttechniqueindogs |