Cargando…
Separation of water and fat signal in whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks
PURPOSE: To perform and evaluate water–fat signal separation of whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks. METHODS: Whole‐body gradient echo scans of 240 subjects, each consisting of 5 bipolar echoes, were used. Reference fat fraction maps were created using a conventional m...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31033022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27786 |
_version_ | 1783433835026841600 |
---|---|
author | Andersson, Jonathan Ahlström, Håkan Kullberg, Joel |
author_facet | Andersson, Jonathan Ahlström, Håkan Kullberg, Joel |
author_sort | Andersson, Jonathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To perform and evaluate water–fat signal separation of whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks. METHODS: Whole‐body gradient echo scans of 240 subjects, each consisting of 5 bipolar echoes, were used. Reference fat fraction maps were created using a conventional method. Convolutional neural networks, more specifically 2D U‐nets, were trained using 5‐fold cross‐validation with 1 or several echoes as input, using the squared difference between the output and the reference fat fraction maps as the loss function. The outputs of the networks were assessed by the loss function, measured liver fat fractions, and visually. Training was performed using a graphics processing unit (GPU). Inference was performed using the GPU as well as a central processing unit (CPU). RESULTS: The loss curves indicated convergence, and the final loss of the validation data decreased when using more echoes as input. The liver fat fractions could be estimated using only 1 echo, but results were improved by use of more echoes. Visual assessment found the quality of the outputs of the networks to be similar to the reference even when using only 1 echo, with slight improvements when using more echoes. Training a network took at most 28.6 h. Inference time of a whole‐body scan took at most 3.7 s using the GPU and 5.8 min using the CPU. CONCLUSION: It is possible to perform water–fat signal separation of whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks. Separation was possible using only 1 echo, although using more echoes improved the results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6618066 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66180662019-07-22 Separation of water and fat signal in whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks Andersson, Jonathan Ahlström, Håkan Kullberg, Joel Magn Reson Med Full Paper—Computer Processing and Modeling PURPOSE: To perform and evaluate water–fat signal separation of whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks. METHODS: Whole‐body gradient echo scans of 240 subjects, each consisting of 5 bipolar echoes, were used. Reference fat fraction maps were created using a conventional method. Convolutional neural networks, more specifically 2D U‐nets, were trained using 5‐fold cross‐validation with 1 or several echoes as input, using the squared difference between the output and the reference fat fraction maps as the loss function. The outputs of the networks were assessed by the loss function, measured liver fat fractions, and visually. Training was performed using a graphics processing unit (GPU). Inference was performed using the GPU as well as a central processing unit (CPU). RESULTS: The loss curves indicated convergence, and the final loss of the validation data decreased when using more echoes as input. The liver fat fractions could be estimated using only 1 echo, but results were improved by use of more echoes. Visual assessment found the quality of the outputs of the networks to be similar to the reference even when using only 1 echo, with slight improvements when using more echoes. Training a network took at most 28.6 h. Inference time of a whole‐body scan took at most 3.7 s using the GPU and 5.8 min using the CPU. CONCLUSION: It is possible to perform water–fat signal separation of whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks. Separation was possible using only 1 echo, although using more echoes improved the results. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-29 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6618066/ /pubmed/31033022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27786 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Full Paper—Computer Processing and Modeling Andersson, Jonathan Ahlström, Håkan Kullberg, Joel Separation of water and fat signal in whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks |
title | Separation of water and fat signal in whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks |
title_full | Separation of water and fat signal in whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks |
title_fullStr | Separation of water and fat signal in whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Separation of water and fat signal in whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks |
title_short | Separation of water and fat signal in whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks |
title_sort | separation of water and fat signal in whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks |
topic | Full Paper—Computer Processing and Modeling |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31033022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27786 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anderssonjonathan separationofwaterandfatsignalinwholebodygradientechoscansusingconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT ahlstromhakan separationofwaterandfatsignalinwholebodygradientechoscansusingconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT kullbergjoel separationofwaterandfatsignalinwholebodygradientechoscansusingconvolutionalneuralnetworks |