Cargando…

Separation of water and fat signal in whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks

PURPOSE: To perform and evaluate water–fat signal separation of whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks. METHODS: Whole‐body gradient echo scans of 240 subjects, each consisting of 5 bipolar echoes, were used. Reference fat fraction maps were created using a conventional m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andersson, Jonathan, Ahlström, Håkan, Kullberg, Joel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31033022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27786
_version_ 1783433835026841600
author Andersson, Jonathan
Ahlström, Håkan
Kullberg, Joel
author_facet Andersson, Jonathan
Ahlström, Håkan
Kullberg, Joel
author_sort Andersson, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To perform and evaluate water–fat signal separation of whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks. METHODS: Whole‐body gradient echo scans of 240 subjects, each consisting of 5 bipolar echoes, were used. Reference fat fraction maps were created using a conventional method. Convolutional neural networks, more specifically 2D U‐nets, were trained using 5‐fold cross‐validation with 1 or several echoes as input, using the squared difference between the output and the reference fat fraction maps as the loss function. The outputs of the networks were assessed by the loss function, measured liver fat fractions, and visually. Training was performed using a graphics processing unit (GPU). Inference was performed using the GPU as well as a central processing unit (CPU). RESULTS: The loss curves indicated convergence, and the final loss of the validation data decreased when using more echoes as input. The liver fat fractions could be estimated using only 1 echo, but results were improved by use of more echoes. Visual assessment found the quality of the outputs of the networks to be similar to the reference even when using only 1 echo, with slight improvements when using more echoes. Training a network took at most 28.6 h. Inference time of a whole‐body scan took at most 3.7 s using the GPU and 5.8 min using the CPU. CONCLUSION: It is possible to perform water–fat signal separation of whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks. Separation was possible using only 1 echo, although using more echoes improved the results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6618066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66180662019-07-22 Separation of water and fat signal in whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks Andersson, Jonathan Ahlström, Håkan Kullberg, Joel Magn Reson Med Full Paper—Computer Processing and Modeling PURPOSE: To perform and evaluate water–fat signal separation of whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks. METHODS: Whole‐body gradient echo scans of 240 subjects, each consisting of 5 bipolar echoes, were used. Reference fat fraction maps were created using a conventional method. Convolutional neural networks, more specifically 2D U‐nets, were trained using 5‐fold cross‐validation with 1 or several echoes as input, using the squared difference between the output and the reference fat fraction maps as the loss function. The outputs of the networks were assessed by the loss function, measured liver fat fractions, and visually. Training was performed using a graphics processing unit (GPU). Inference was performed using the GPU as well as a central processing unit (CPU). RESULTS: The loss curves indicated convergence, and the final loss of the validation data decreased when using more echoes as input. The liver fat fractions could be estimated using only 1 echo, but results were improved by use of more echoes. Visual assessment found the quality of the outputs of the networks to be similar to the reference even when using only 1 echo, with slight improvements when using more echoes. Training a network took at most 28.6 h. Inference time of a whole‐body scan took at most 3.7 s using the GPU and 5.8 min using the CPU. CONCLUSION: It is possible to perform water–fat signal separation of whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks. Separation was possible using only 1 echo, although using more echoes improved the results. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-29 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6618066/ /pubmed/31033022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27786 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Full Paper—Computer Processing and Modeling
Andersson, Jonathan
Ahlström, Håkan
Kullberg, Joel
Separation of water and fat signal in whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks
title Separation of water and fat signal in whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks
title_full Separation of water and fat signal in whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks
title_fullStr Separation of water and fat signal in whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks
title_full_unstemmed Separation of water and fat signal in whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks
title_short Separation of water and fat signal in whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks
title_sort separation of water and fat signal in whole‐body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks
topic Full Paper—Computer Processing and Modeling
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31033022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27786
work_keys_str_mv AT anderssonjonathan separationofwaterandfatsignalinwholebodygradientechoscansusingconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT ahlstromhakan separationofwaterandfatsignalinwholebodygradientechoscansusingconvolutionalneuralnetworks
AT kullbergjoel separationofwaterandfatsignalinwholebodygradientechoscansusingconvolutionalneuralnetworks