Cargando…

Electroencephalographic reactivity as predictor of neurological outcome in postanoxic coma: A multicenter prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE: Outcome prediction in patients after cardiac arrest (CA) is challenging. Electroencephalographic reactivity (EEG‐R) might be a reliable predictor. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of EEG‐R using a standardized assessment. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, a strictly define...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Admiraal, Marjolein M., van Rootselaar, Anne‐Fleur, Hofmeijer, Jeannette, Hoedemaekers, Cornelia W. E., van Kaam, Christiaan R., Keijzer, Hanneke M., van Putten, Michel J. A. M., Schultz, Marcus J., Horn, Janneke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31124174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.25507
_version_ 1783433844812152832
author Admiraal, Marjolein M.
van Rootselaar, Anne‐Fleur
Hofmeijer, Jeannette
Hoedemaekers, Cornelia W. E.
van Kaam, Christiaan R.
Keijzer, Hanneke M.
van Putten, Michel J. A. M.
Schultz, Marcus J.
Horn, Janneke
author_facet Admiraal, Marjolein M.
van Rootselaar, Anne‐Fleur
Hofmeijer, Jeannette
Hoedemaekers, Cornelia W. E.
van Kaam, Christiaan R.
Keijzer, Hanneke M.
van Putten, Michel J. A. M.
Schultz, Marcus J.
Horn, Janneke
author_sort Admiraal, Marjolein M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Outcome prediction in patients after cardiac arrest (CA) is challenging. Electroencephalographic reactivity (EEG‐R) might be a reliable predictor. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of EEG‐R using a standardized assessment. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, a strictly defined EEG‐R assessment protocol was executed twice per day in adult patients after CA. EEG‐R was classified as present or absent by 3 EEG readers, blinded to patient characteristics. Uncertain reactivity was classified as present. Primary outcome was best Cerebral Performance Category score (CPC) in 6 months after CA, dichotomized as good (CPC = 1–2) or poor (CPC = 3–5). EEG‐R was considered reliable for predicting poor outcome if specificity was ≥95%. For good outcome prediction, a specificity of ≥80% was used. Added value of EEG‐R was the increase in specificity when combined with EEG background, neurological examination, and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs). RESULTS: Of 160 patients enrolled, 149 were available for analyses. Absence of EEG‐R for poor outcome prediction had a specificity of 82% and a sensitivity of 73%. For good outcome prediction, specificity was 73% and sensitivity 82%. Specificity for poor outcome prediction increased from 98% to 99% when EEG‐R was added to a multimodal model. For good outcome prediction, specificity increased from 70% to 89%. INTERPRETATION: EEG‐R testing in itself is not sufficiently reliable for outcome prediction in patients after CA. For poor outcome prediction, it has no substantial added value to EEG background, neurological examination, and SSEPs. For prediction of good outcome, EEG‐R seems to have added value. ANN NEUROL 2019
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6618107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66181072019-07-22 Electroencephalographic reactivity as predictor of neurological outcome in postanoxic coma: A multicenter prospective cohort study Admiraal, Marjolein M. van Rootselaar, Anne‐Fleur Hofmeijer, Jeannette Hoedemaekers, Cornelia W. E. van Kaam, Christiaan R. Keijzer, Hanneke M. van Putten, Michel J. A. M. Schultz, Marcus J. Horn, Janneke Ann Neurol Research Articles OBJECTIVE: Outcome prediction in patients after cardiac arrest (CA) is challenging. Electroencephalographic reactivity (EEG‐R) might be a reliable predictor. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of EEG‐R using a standardized assessment. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, a strictly defined EEG‐R assessment protocol was executed twice per day in adult patients after CA. EEG‐R was classified as present or absent by 3 EEG readers, blinded to patient characteristics. Uncertain reactivity was classified as present. Primary outcome was best Cerebral Performance Category score (CPC) in 6 months after CA, dichotomized as good (CPC = 1–2) or poor (CPC = 3–5). EEG‐R was considered reliable for predicting poor outcome if specificity was ≥95%. For good outcome prediction, a specificity of ≥80% was used. Added value of EEG‐R was the increase in specificity when combined with EEG background, neurological examination, and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs). RESULTS: Of 160 patients enrolled, 149 were available for analyses. Absence of EEG‐R for poor outcome prediction had a specificity of 82% and a sensitivity of 73%. For good outcome prediction, specificity was 73% and sensitivity 82%. Specificity for poor outcome prediction increased from 98% to 99% when EEG‐R was added to a multimodal model. For good outcome prediction, specificity increased from 70% to 89%. INTERPRETATION: EEG‐R testing in itself is not sufficiently reliable for outcome prediction in patients after CA. For poor outcome prediction, it has no substantial added value to EEG background, neurological examination, and SSEPs. For prediction of good outcome, EEG‐R seems to have added value. ANN NEUROL 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-06-08 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6618107/ /pubmed/31124174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.25507 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Neurological Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Admiraal, Marjolein M.
van Rootselaar, Anne‐Fleur
Hofmeijer, Jeannette
Hoedemaekers, Cornelia W. E.
van Kaam, Christiaan R.
Keijzer, Hanneke M.
van Putten, Michel J. A. M.
Schultz, Marcus J.
Horn, Janneke
Electroencephalographic reactivity as predictor of neurological outcome in postanoxic coma: A multicenter prospective cohort study
title Electroencephalographic reactivity as predictor of neurological outcome in postanoxic coma: A multicenter prospective cohort study
title_full Electroencephalographic reactivity as predictor of neurological outcome in postanoxic coma: A multicenter prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Electroencephalographic reactivity as predictor of neurological outcome in postanoxic coma: A multicenter prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Electroencephalographic reactivity as predictor of neurological outcome in postanoxic coma: A multicenter prospective cohort study
title_short Electroencephalographic reactivity as predictor of neurological outcome in postanoxic coma: A multicenter prospective cohort study
title_sort electroencephalographic reactivity as predictor of neurological outcome in postanoxic coma: a multicenter prospective cohort study
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31124174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.25507
work_keys_str_mv AT admiraalmarjoleinm electroencephalographicreactivityaspredictorofneurologicaloutcomeinpostanoxiccomaamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT vanrootselaarannefleur electroencephalographicreactivityaspredictorofneurologicaloutcomeinpostanoxiccomaamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT hofmeijerjeannette electroencephalographicreactivityaspredictorofneurologicaloutcomeinpostanoxiccomaamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT hoedemaekerscorneliawe electroencephalographicreactivityaspredictorofneurologicaloutcomeinpostanoxiccomaamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT vankaamchristiaanr electroencephalographicreactivityaspredictorofneurologicaloutcomeinpostanoxiccomaamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT keijzerhannekem electroencephalographicreactivityaspredictorofneurologicaloutcomeinpostanoxiccomaamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT vanputtenmicheljam electroencephalographicreactivityaspredictorofneurologicaloutcomeinpostanoxiccomaamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT schultzmarcusj electroencephalographicreactivityaspredictorofneurologicaloutcomeinpostanoxiccomaamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT hornjanneke electroencephalographicreactivityaspredictorofneurologicaloutcomeinpostanoxiccomaamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy