Cargando…

μCT trait analysis reveals morphometric differences between domesticated temperate small grain cereals and their wild relatives

Wheat and barley are two of the founder crops domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, and currently represent crops of major economic importance in temperate regions. Due to impacts on yield, quality and end‐use, grain morphometric traits remain an important goal for modern breeding programmes and are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hughes, Aoife, Oliveira, Hugo R., Fradgley, Nick, Corke, Fiona M. K., Cockram, James, Doonan, John H., Nibau, Candida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30868647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14312
_version_ 1783433847596122112
author Hughes, Aoife
Oliveira, Hugo R.
Fradgley, Nick
Corke, Fiona M. K.
Cockram, James
Doonan, John H.
Nibau, Candida
author_facet Hughes, Aoife
Oliveira, Hugo R.
Fradgley, Nick
Corke, Fiona M. K.
Cockram, James
Doonan, John H.
Nibau, Candida
author_sort Hughes, Aoife
collection PubMed
description Wheat and barley are two of the founder crops domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, and currently represent crops of major economic importance in temperate regions. Due to impacts on yield, quality and end‐use, grain morphometric traits remain an important goal for modern breeding programmes and are believed to have been selected for by human populations. To directly and accurately assess the three‐dimensional (3D) characteristics of grains, we combine X‐ray microcomputed tomography (μCT) imaging techniques with bespoke image analysis tools and mathematical modelling to investigate how grain size and shape vary across wild and domesticated wheat and barley. We find that grain depth and, to a lesser extent, width are major drivers of shape change and that these traits are still relatively plastic in modern bread wheat varieties. Significant changes in grain depth are also observed to be associated with differences in ploidy. Finally, we present a model that can accurately predict the wild or domesticated status of a grain from a given taxa based on the relationship between three morphometric parameters (length, width and depth) and suggest its general applicability to both archaeological identification studies and breeding programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6618119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66181192019-07-22 μCT trait analysis reveals morphometric differences between domesticated temperate small grain cereals and their wild relatives Hughes, Aoife Oliveira, Hugo R. Fradgley, Nick Corke, Fiona M. K. Cockram, James Doonan, John H. Nibau, Candida Plant J Original Articles Wheat and barley are two of the founder crops domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, and currently represent crops of major economic importance in temperate regions. Due to impacts on yield, quality and end‐use, grain morphometric traits remain an important goal for modern breeding programmes and are believed to have been selected for by human populations. To directly and accurately assess the three‐dimensional (3D) characteristics of grains, we combine X‐ray microcomputed tomography (μCT) imaging techniques with bespoke image analysis tools and mathematical modelling to investigate how grain size and shape vary across wild and domesticated wheat and barley. We find that grain depth and, to a lesser extent, width are major drivers of shape change and that these traits are still relatively plastic in modern bread wheat varieties. Significant changes in grain depth are also observed to be associated with differences in ploidy. Finally, we present a model that can accurately predict the wild or domesticated status of a grain from a given taxa based on the relationship between three morphometric parameters (length, width and depth) and suggest its general applicability to both archaeological identification studies and breeding programmes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-10 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6618119/ /pubmed/30868647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14312 Text en © 2019 The Authors. The Plant Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Experimental Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hughes, Aoife
Oliveira, Hugo R.
Fradgley, Nick
Corke, Fiona M. K.
Cockram, James
Doonan, John H.
Nibau, Candida
μCT trait analysis reveals morphometric differences between domesticated temperate small grain cereals and their wild relatives
title μCT trait analysis reveals morphometric differences between domesticated temperate small grain cereals and their wild relatives
title_full μCT trait analysis reveals morphometric differences between domesticated temperate small grain cereals and their wild relatives
title_fullStr μCT trait analysis reveals morphometric differences between domesticated temperate small grain cereals and their wild relatives
title_full_unstemmed μCT trait analysis reveals morphometric differences between domesticated temperate small grain cereals and their wild relatives
title_short μCT trait analysis reveals morphometric differences between domesticated temperate small grain cereals and their wild relatives
title_sort μct trait analysis reveals morphometric differences between domesticated temperate small grain cereals and their wild relatives
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30868647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14312
work_keys_str_mv AT hughesaoife mcttraitanalysisrevealsmorphometricdifferencesbetweendomesticatedtemperatesmallgraincerealsandtheirwildrelatives
AT oliveirahugor mcttraitanalysisrevealsmorphometricdifferencesbetweendomesticatedtemperatesmallgraincerealsandtheirwildrelatives
AT fradgleynick mcttraitanalysisrevealsmorphometricdifferencesbetweendomesticatedtemperatesmallgraincerealsandtheirwildrelatives
AT corkefionamk mcttraitanalysisrevealsmorphometricdifferencesbetweendomesticatedtemperatesmallgraincerealsandtheirwildrelatives
AT cockramjames mcttraitanalysisrevealsmorphometricdifferencesbetweendomesticatedtemperatesmallgraincerealsandtheirwildrelatives
AT doonanjohnh mcttraitanalysisrevealsmorphometricdifferencesbetweendomesticatedtemperatesmallgraincerealsandtheirwildrelatives
AT nibaucandida mcttraitanalysisrevealsmorphometricdifferencesbetweendomesticatedtemperatesmallgraincerealsandtheirwildrelatives