Cargando…

Fetal anogenital distance using ultrasound

OBJECTIVE: This study measured anogenital distance (AGD) during late second/early third trimester of pregnancy to confirm previous findings that AGD can be measured noninvasively in the fetus using ultrasound and further showed differences in reference ranges between populations. METHOD: Two hundred...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aydin, Ezra, Holt, Rosemary, Chaplin, Daren, Hawkes, Rebecca, Allison, Carrie, Hackett, Gerald, Austin, Topun, Tsompanidis, Alex, Gabis, Lidia, Ziv, Shimrit Ilana, Baron‐Cohen, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30980419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5459
_version_ 1783433855438422016
author Aydin, Ezra
Holt, Rosemary
Chaplin, Daren
Hawkes, Rebecca
Allison, Carrie
Hackett, Gerald
Austin, Topun
Tsompanidis, Alex
Gabis, Lidia
Ziv, Shimrit Ilana
Baron‐Cohen, Simon
author_facet Aydin, Ezra
Holt, Rosemary
Chaplin, Daren
Hawkes, Rebecca
Allison, Carrie
Hackett, Gerald
Austin, Topun
Tsompanidis, Alex
Gabis, Lidia
Ziv, Shimrit Ilana
Baron‐Cohen, Simon
author_sort Aydin, Ezra
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study measured anogenital distance (AGD) during late second/early third trimester of pregnancy to confirm previous findings that AGD can be measured noninvasively in the fetus using ultrasound and further showed differences in reference ranges between populations. METHOD: Two hundred ten singleton pregnancies were recruited at the Rosie Hospital, Cambridge, UK. A 2D ultrasound was performed between 26 and 30 weeks of pregnancy. AGD was measured from the centre of the anus to the base of the scrotum in males and to the posterior convergence of the fourchette in females. RESULTS: A significant difference in AGD between males and females (P < .0001) was found, replicating previous results with a significant correlation between estimated fetal weight (EFW) and AGD in males only (P = .006). A comparison of AGD using reference data from an Israeli sample (n = 118) and our UK sample (n = 208) showed a significant difference (P < .0001) in both males and females, after controlling for gestational age (GA). CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that AGD measurement in utero using ultrasound is feasible. In addition, there are strong sex differences, consistent with previous suggestions that AGD is influenced by prenatal androgen exposure. AGD lengths differ between the UK and Israel; therefore, population‐specific normative values may be required for accurate clinical assessments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6618155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66181552019-07-22 Fetal anogenital distance using ultrasound Aydin, Ezra Holt, Rosemary Chaplin, Daren Hawkes, Rebecca Allison, Carrie Hackett, Gerald Austin, Topun Tsompanidis, Alex Gabis, Lidia Ziv, Shimrit Ilana Baron‐Cohen, Simon Prenat Diagn Original Articles OBJECTIVE: This study measured anogenital distance (AGD) during late second/early third trimester of pregnancy to confirm previous findings that AGD can be measured noninvasively in the fetus using ultrasound and further showed differences in reference ranges between populations. METHOD: Two hundred ten singleton pregnancies were recruited at the Rosie Hospital, Cambridge, UK. A 2D ultrasound was performed between 26 and 30 weeks of pregnancy. AGD was measured from the centre of the anus to the base of the scrotum in males and to the posterior convergence of the fourchette in females. RESULTS: A significant difference in AGD between males and females (P < .0001) was found, replicating previous results with a significant correlation between estimated fetal weight (EFW) and AGD in males only (P = .006). A comparison of AGD using reference data from an Israeli sample (n = 118) and our UK sample (n = 208) showed a significant difference (P < .0001) in both males and females, after controlling for gestational age (GA). CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that AGD measurement in utero using ultrasound is feasible. In addition, there are strong sex differences, consistent with previous suggestions that AGD is influenced by prenatal androgen exposure. AGD lengths differ between the UK and Israel; therefore, population‐specific normative values may be required for accurate clinical assessments. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-10 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6618155/ /pubmed/30980419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5459 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Aydin, Ezra
Holt, Rosemary
Chaplin, Daren
Hawkes, Rebecca
Allison, Carrie
Hackett, Gerald
Austin, Topun
Tsompanidis, Alex
Gabis, Lidia
Ziv, Shimrit Ilana
Baron‐Cohen, Simon
Fetal anogenital distance using ultrasound
title Fetal anogenital distance using ultrasound
title_full Fetal anogenital distance using ultrasound
title_fullStr Fetal anogenital distance using ultrasound
title_full_unstemmed Fetal anogenital distance using ultrasound
title_short Fetal anogenital distance using ultrasound
title_sort fetal anogenital distance using ultrasound
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30980419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5459
work_keys_str_mv AT aydinezra fetalanogenitaldistanceusingultrasound
AT holtrosemary fetalanogenitaldistanceusingultrasound
AT chaplindaren fetalanogenitaldistanceusingultrasound
AT hawkesrebecca fetalanogenitaldistanceusingultrasound
AT allisoncarrie fetalanogenitaldistanceusingultrasound
AT hackettgerald fetalanogenitaldistanceusingultrasound
AT austintopun fetalanogenitaldistanceusingultrasound
AT tsompanidisalex fetalanogenitaldistanceusingultrasound
AT gabislidia fetalanogenitaldistanceusingultrasound
AT zivshimritilana fetalanogenitaldistanceusingultrasound
AT baroncohensimon fetalanogenitaldistanceusingultrasound