Cargando…
Tree shape‐based approaches for the comparative study of cophylogeny
Cophylogeny is the congruence of phylogenetic relationships between two different groups of organisms due to their long‐term interaction. We investigated the use of tree shape distance measures to quantify the degree of cophylogeny. We implemented a reverse‐time simulation model of pathogen phylogen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31312429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5185 |
_version_ | 1783433855668060160 |
---|---|
author | Avino, Mariano Ng, Garway T. He, Yiying Renaud, Mathias S. Jones, Bradley R. Poon, Art F. Y. |
author_facet | Avino, Mariano Ng, Garway T. He, Yiying Renaud, Mathias S. Jones, Bradley R. Poon, Art F. Y. |
author_sort | Avino, Mariano |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cophylogeny is the congruence of phylogenetic relationships between two different groups of organisms due to their long‐term interaction. We investigated the use of tree shape distance measures to quantify the degree of cophylogeny. We implemented a reverse‐time simulation model of pathogen phylogenies within a fixed host tree, given cospeciation probability, host switching, and pathogen speciation rates. We used this model to evaluate 18 distance measures between host and pathogen trees including two kernel distances that we developed for labeled and unlabeled trees, which use branch lengths and accommodate different size trees. Finally, we used these measures to revisit published cophylogenetic studies, where authors described the observed associations as representing a high or low degree of cophylogeny. Our simulations demonstrated that some measures are more informative than others with respect to specific coevolution parameters especially when these did not assume extreme values. For real datasets, trees’ associations projection revealed clustering of high concordance studies suggesting that investigators are describing it in a consistent way. Our results support the hypothesis that measures can be useful for quantifying cophylogeny. This motivates their usage in the field of coevolution and supports the development of simulation‐based methods, i.e., approximate Bayesian computation, to estimate the underlying coevolutionary parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6618157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66181572019-07-16 Tree shape‐based approaches for the comparative study of cophylogeny Avino, Mariano Ng, Garway T. He, Yiying Renaud, Mathias S. Jones, Bradley R. Poon, Art F. Y. Ecol Evol Original Research Cophylogeny is the congruence of phylogenetic relationships between two different groups of organisms due to their long‐term interaction. We investigated the use of tree shape distance measures to quantify the degree of cophylogeny. We implemented a reverse‐time simulation model of pathogen phylogenies within a fixed host tree, given cospeciation probability, host switching, and pathogen speciation rates. We used this model to evaluate 18 distance measures between host and pathogen trees including two kernel distances that we developed for labeled and unlabeled trees, which use branch lengths and accommodate different size trees. Finally, we used these measures to revisit published cophylogenetic studies, where authors described the observed associations as representing a high or low degree of cophylogeny. Our simulations demonstrated that some measures are more informative than others with respect to specific coevolution parameters especially when these did not assume extreme values. For real datasets, trees’ associations projection revealed clustering of high concordance studies suggesting that investigators are describing it in a consistent way. Our results support the hypothesis that measures can be useful for quantifying cophylogeny. This motivates their usage in the field of coevolution and supports the development of simulation‐based methods, i.e., approximate Bayesian computation, to estimate the underlying coevolutionary parameters. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6618157/ /pubmed/31312429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5185 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Avino, Mariano Ng, Garway T. He, Yiying Renaud, Mathias S. Jones, Bradley R. Poon, Art F. Y. Tree shape‐based approaches for the comparative study of cophylogeny |
title | Tree shape‐based approaches for the comparative study of cophylogeny |
title_full | Tree shape‐based approaches for the comparative study of cophylogeny |
title_fullStr | Tree shape‐based approaches for the comparative study of cophylogeny |
title_full_unstemmed | Tree shape‐based approaches for the comparative study of cophylogeny |
title_short | Tree shape‐based approaches for the comparative study of cophylogeny |
title_sort | tree shape‐based approaches for the comparative study of cophylogeny |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31312429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5185 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT avinomariano treeshapebasedapproachesforthecomparativestudyofcophylogeny AT nggarwayt treeshapebasedapproachesforthecomparativestudyofcophylogeny AT heyiying treeshapebasedapproachesforthecomparativestudyofcophylogeny AT renaudmathiass treeshapebasedapproachesforthecomparativestudyofcophylogeny AT jonesbradleyr treeshapebasedapproachesforthecomparativestudyofcophylogeny AT poonartfy treeshapebasedapproachesforthecomparativestudyofcophylogeny |