Cargando…

Quantification of turbulence and velocity in stenotic flow using spiral three‐dimensional phase‐contrast MRI

PURPOSE: Evaluate spiral three‐dimensional (3D) phase contrast MRI for the assessment of turbulence and velocity in stenotic flow. METHODS: A‐stack‐of‐spirals 3D phase contrast MRI sequence was evaluated in vitro against a conventional Cartesian sequence. Measurements were made in a flow phantom wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petersson, Sven, Dyverfeldt, Petter, Sigfridsson, Andreas, Lantz, Jonas, Carlhäll, Carl‐Johan, Ebbers, Tino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25846511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25698
_version_ 1783433882592346112
author Petersson, Sven
Dyverfeldt, Petter
Sigfridsson, Andreas
Lantz, Jonas
Carlhäll, Carl‐Johan
Ebbers, Tino
author_facet Petersson, Sven
Dyverfeldt, Petter
Sigfridsson, Andreas
Lantz, Jonas
Carlhäll, Carl‐Johan
Ebbers, Tino
author_sort Petersson, Sven
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Evaluate spiral three‐dimensional (3D) phase contrast MRI for the assessment of turbulence and velocity in stenotic flow. METHODS: A‐stack‐of‐spirals 3D phase contrast MRI sequence was evaluated in vitro against a conventional Cartesian sequence. Measurements were made in a flow phantom with a 75% stenosis. Both spiral and Cartesian imaging were performed using different scan orientations and flow rates. Volume flow rate, maximum velocity and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) were computed for both methods. Moreover, the estimated TKE was compared with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) data. RESULTS: There was good agreement between the turbulent kinetic energy from the spiral, Cartesian and CFD data. Flow rate and maximum velocity from the spiral data agreed well with Cartesian data. As expected, the short echo time of the spiral sequence resulted in less prominent displacement artifacts compared with the Cartesian sequence. However, both spiral and Cartesian flow rate estimates were sensitive to displacement when the flow was oblique to the encoding directions. CONCLUSION: Spiral 3D phase contrast MRI appears favorable for the assessment of stenotic flow. The spiral sequence was more than three times faster and less sensitive to displacement artifacts when compared with a conventional Cartesian sequence. Magn Reson Med 75:1249–1255, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6618270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66182702019-07-22 Quantification of turbulence and velocity in stenotic flow using spiral three‐dimensional phase‐contrast MRI Petersson, Sven Dyverfeldt, Petter Sigfridsson, Andreas Lantz, Jonas Carlhäll, Carl‐Johan Ebbers, Tino Magn Reson Med Imaging Methodology—Notes PURPOSE: Evaluate spiral three‐dimensional (3D) phase contrast MRI for the assessment of turbulence and velocity in stenotic flow. METHODS: A‐stack‐of‐spirals 3D phase contrast MRI sequence was evaluated in vitro against a conventional Cartesian sequence. Measurements were made in a flow phantom with a 75% stenosis. Both spiral and Cartesian imaging were performed using different scan orientations and flow rates. Volume flow rate, maximum velocity and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) were computed for both methods. Moreover, the estimated TKE was compared with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) data. RESULTS: There was good agreement between the turbulent kinetic energy from the spiral, Cartesian and CFD data. Flow rate and maximum velocity from the spiral data agreed well with Cartesian data. As expected, the short echo time of the spiral sequence resulted in less prominent displacement artifacts compared with the Cartesian sequence. However, both spiral and Cartesian flow rate estimates were sensitive to displacement when the flow was oblique to the encoding directions. CONCLUSION: Spiral 3D phase contrast MRI appears favorable for the assessment of stenotic flow. The spiral sequence was more than three times faster and less sensitive to displacement artifacts when compared with a conventional Cartesian sequence. Magn Reson Med 75:1249–1255, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-04-04 2016-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6618270/ /pubmed/25846511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25698 Text en © 2015 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Imaging Methodology—Notes
Petersson, Sven
Dyverfeldt, Petter
Sigfridsson, Andreas
Lantz, Jonas
Carlhäll, Carl‐Johan
Ebbers, Tino
Quantification of turbulence and velocity in stenotic flow using spiral three‐dimensional phase‐contrast MRI
title Quantification of turbulence and velocity in stenotic flow using spiral three‐dimensional phase‐contrast MRI
title_full Quantification of turbulence and velocity in stenotic flow using spiral three‐dimensional phase‐contrast MRI
title_fullStr Quantification of turbulence and velocity in stenotic flow using spiral three‐dimensional phase‐contrast MRI
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of turbulence and velocity in stenotic flow using spiral three‐dimensional phase‐contrast MRI
title_short Quantification of turbulence and velocity in stenotic flow using spiral three‐dimensional phase‐contrast MRI
title_sort quantification of turbulence and velocity in stenotic flow using spiral three‐dimensional phase‐contrast mri
topic Imaging Methodology—Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25846511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25698
work_keys_str_mv AT peterssonsven quantificationofturbulenceandvelocityinstenoticflowusingspiralthreedimensionalphasecontrastmri
AT dyverfeldtpetter quantificationofturbulenceandvelocityinstenoticflowusingspiralthreedimensionalphasecontrastmri
AT sigfridssonandreas quantificationofturbulenceandvelocityinstenoticflowusingspiralthreedimensionalphasecontrastmri
AT lantzjonas quantificationofturbulenceandvelocityinstenoticflowusingspiralthreedimensionalphasecontrastmri
AT carlhallcarljohan quantificationofturbulenceandvelocityinstenoticflowusingspiralthreedimensionalphasecontrastmri
AT ebberstino quantificationofturbulenceandvelocityinstenoticflowusingspiralthreedimensionalphasecontrastmri