Cargando…

Using subjective expectations to model the neural underpinnings of proactive inhibition

Proactive inhibition – the anticipation of having to stop a response – relies on objective information contained in cue‐related contingencies in the environment, as well as on the subjective interpretation derived from these cues. To date, most studies of brain areas underlying proactive inhibition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pas, Pascal, Plessis, Stefan Du, van den Munkhof, Hanna E., Gladwin, Thomas E., Vink, Matthijs
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30556927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14308
_version_ 1783433888704495616
author Pas, Pascal
Plessis, Stefan Du
van den Munkhof, Hanna E.
Gladwin, Thomas E.
Vink, Matthijs
author_facet Pas, Pascal
Plessis, Stefan Du
van den Munkhof, Hanna E.
Gladwin, Thomas E.
Vink, Matthijs
author_sort Pas, Pascal
collection PubMed
description Proactive inhibition – the anticipation of having to stop a response – relies on objective information contained in cue‐related contingencies in the environment, as well as on the subjective interpretation derived from these cues. To date, most studies of brain areas underlying proactive inhibition have exclusively considered the objective predictive value of environmental cues, by varying the probability of stop‐signals. However, by only taking into account the effect of different cues on brain activation, the subjective component of how cues affect behavior is ignored. We used a modified stop‐signal response task that includes a measurement for subjective expectation, to investigate the effect of this subjective interpretation. After presenting a cue indicating the probability that a stop‐signal will occur, subjects were asked whether they expected a stop‐signal to occur. Furthermore, response time was used to retrospectively model brain activation related to stop‐expectation. We found more activation during the cue period for 50% stop‐signal probability, when contrasting with 0%, in the mid and inferior frontal gyrus, inferior parietal lobe and putamen. When contrasting expected vs. unexpected trials, we found modest effects in the mid frontal gyrus, parietal, and occipital areas. With our third contrast, we modeled brain activation during the cue with trial‐by‐trial variances in response times. This yielded activation in the putamen, inferior parietal lobe, and mid frontal gyrus. Our study is the first to use the behavioral effects of proactive inhibition to identify the underlying brain regions, by employing an unbiased task‐design that temporally separates cue and response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6618303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66183032019-07-22 Using subjective expectations to model the neural underpinnings of proactive inhibition Pas, Pascal Plessis, Stefan Du van den Munkhof, Hanna E. Gladwin, Thomas E. Vink, Matthijs Eur J Neurosci Cognitive Neuroscience Proactive inhibition – the anticipation of having to stop a response – relies on objective information contained in cue‐related contingencies in the environment, as well as on the subjective interpretation derived from these cues. To date, most studies of brain areas underlying proactive inhibition have exclusively considered the objective predictive value of environmental cues, by varying the probability of stop‐signals. However, by only taking into account the effect of different cues on brain activation, the subjective component of how cues affect behavior is ignored. We used a modified stop‐signal response task that includes a measurement for subjective expectation, to investigate the effect of this subjective interpretation. After presenting a cue indicating the probability that a stop‐signal will occur, subjects were asked whether they expected a stop‐signal to occur. Furthermore, response time was used to retrospectively model brain activation related to stop‐expectation. We found more activation during the cue period for 50% stop‐signal probability, when contrasting with 0%, in the mid and inferior frontal gyrus, inferior parietal lobe and putamen. When contrasting expected vs. unexpected trials, we found modest effects in the mid frontal gyrus, parietal, and occipital areas. With our third contrast, we modeled brain activation during the cue with trial‐by‐trial variances in response times. This yielded activation in the putamen, inferior parietal lobe, and mid frontal gyrus. Our study is the first to use the behavioral effects of proactive inhibition to identify the underlying brain regions, by employing an unbiased task‐design that temporally separates cue and response. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-01 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6618303/ /pubmed/30556927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14308 Text en 2018 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cognitive Neuroscience
Pas, Pascal
Plessis, Stefan Du
van den Munkhof, Hanna E.
Gladwin, Thomas E.
Vink, Matthijs
Using subjective expectations to model the neural underpinnings of proactive inhibition
title Using subjective expectations to model the neural underpinnings of proactive inhibition
title_full Using subjective expectations to model the neural underpinnings of proactive inhibition
title_fullStr Using subjective expectations to model the neural underpinnings of proactive inhibition
title_full_unstemmed Using subjective expectations to model the neural underpinnings of proactive inhibition
title_short Using subjective expectations to model the neural underpinnings of proactive inhibition
title_sort using subjective expectations to model the neural underpinnings of proactive inhibition
topic Cognitive Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30556927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14308
work_keys_str_mv AT paspascal usingsubjectiveexpectationstomodeltheneuralunderpinningsofproactiveinhibition
AT plessisstefandu usingsubjectiveexpectationstomodeltheneuralunderpinningsofproactiveinhibition
AT vandenmunkhofhannae usingsubjectiveexpectationstomodeltheneuralunderpinningsofproactiveinhibition
AT gladwinthomase usingsubjectiveexpectationstomodeltheneuralunderpinningsofproactiveinhibition
AT vinkmatthijs usingsubjectiveexpectationstomodeltheneuralunderpinningsofproactiveinhibition