Cargando…

Effects of RF‐EMF on the Human Resting‐State EEG—the Inconsistencies in the Consistency. Part 1: Non‐Exposure‐Related Limitations of Comparability Between Studies

The results of studies on possible effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF‐EMFs) on human waking electroencephalography (EEG) have been quite heterogeneous. In the majority of studies, changes in the alpha‐frequency range in subjects who were exposed to different signals of mobile phone...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Danker‐Hopfe, Heidi, Eggert, Torsten, Dorn, Hans, Sauter, Cornelia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6619284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31215052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bem.22194
_version_ 1783433914064306176
author Danker‐Hopfe, Heidi
Eggert, Torsten
Dorn, Hans
Sauter, Cornelia
author_facet Danker‐Hopfe, Heidi
Eggert, Torsten
Dorn, Hans
Sauter, Cornelia
author_sort Danker‐Hopfe, Heidi
collection PubMed
description The results of studies on possible effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF‐EMFs) on human waking electroencephalography (EEG) have been quite heterogeneous. In the majority of studies, changes in the alpha‐frequency range in subjects who were exposed to different signals of mobile phone‐related EMF sources were observed, whereas other studies did not report any effects. In this review, possible reasons for these inconsistencies are presented and recommendations for future waking EEG studies are made. The physiological basis of underlying brain activity, and the technical requirements and framework conditions for conducting and analyzing the human resting‐state EEG are discussed. Peer‐reviewed articles on possible effects of EMF on waking EEG were evaluated with regard to non‐exposure‐related confounding factors. Recommendations derived from international guidelines on the analysis and reporting of findings are proposed to achieve comparability in future studies. In total, 22 peer‐reviewed studies on possible RF‐EMF effects on human resting‐state EEG were analyzed. EEG power in the alpha frequency range was reported to be increased in 10, decreased in four, and not affected in eight studies. All reviewed studies differ in several ways in terms of the methodologies applied, which might contribute to different results and conclusions about the impact of EMF on human resting‐state EEG. A discussion of various study protocols and different outcome parameters prevents a scientifically sound statement on the impact of RF‐EMF on human brain activity in resting‐state EEG. Further studies which apply comparable, standardized study protocols are recommended. Bioelectromagnetics. 2019;40:291–318. © 2019 The Authors. Bioelectromagnetics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6619284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66192842019-07-22 Effects of RF‐EMF on the Human Resting‐State EEG—the Inconsistencies in the Consistency. Part 1: Non‐Exposure‐Related Limitations of Comparability Between Studies Danker‐Hopfe, Heidi Eggert, Torsten Dorn, Hans Sauter, Cornelia Bioelectromagnetics Review The results of studies on possible effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF‐EMFs) on human waking electroencephalography (EEG) have been quite heterogeneous. In the majority of studies, changes in the alpha‐frequency range in subjects who were exposed to different signals of mobile phone‐related EMF sources were observed, whereas other studies did not report any effects. In this review, possible reasons for these inconsistencies are presented and recommendations for future waking EEG studies are made. The physiological basis of underlying brain activity, and the technical requirements and framework conditions for conducting and analyzing the human resting‐state EEG are discussed. Peer‐reviewed articles on possible effects of EMF on waking EEG were evaluated with regard to non‐exposure‐related confounding factors. Recommendations derived from international guidelines on the analysis and reporting of findings are proposed to achieve comparability in future studies. In total, 22 peer‐reviewed studies on possible RF‐EMF effects on human resting‐state EEG were analyzed. EEG power in the alpha frequency range was reported to be increased in 10, decreased in four, and not affected in eight studies. All reviewed studies differ in several ways in terms of the methodologies applied, which might contribute to different results and conclusions about the impact of EMF on human resting‐state EEG. A discussion of various study protocols and different outcome parameters prevents a scientifically sound statement on the impact of RF‐EMF on human brain activity in resting‐state EEG. Further studies which apply comparable, standardized study protocols are recommended. Bioelectromagnetics. 2019;40:291–318. © 2019 The Authors. Bioelectromagnetics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-06-18 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6619284/ /pubmed/31215052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bem.22194 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Bioelectromagnetics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review
Danker‐Hopfe, Heidi
Eggert, Torsten
Dorn, Hans
Sauter, Cornelia
Effects of RF‐EMF on the Human Resting‐State EEG—the Inconsistencies in the Consistency. Part 1: Non‐Exposure‐Related Limitations of Comparability Between Studies
title Effects of RF‐EMF on the Human Resting‐State EEG—the Inconsistencies in the Consistency. Part 1: Non‐Exposure‐Related Limitations of Comparability Between Studies
title_full Effects of RF‐EMF on the Human Resting‐State EEG—the Inconsistencies in the Consistency. Part 1: Non‐Exposure‐Related Limitations of Comparability Between Studies
title_fullStr Effects of RF‐EMF on the Human Resting‐State EEG—the Inconsistencies in the Consistency. Part 1: Non‐Exposure‐Related Limitations of Comparability Between Studies
title_full_unstemmed Effects of RF‐EMF on the Human Resting‐State EEG—the Inconsistencies in the Consistency. Part 1: Non‐Exposure‐Related Limitations of Comparability Between Studies
title_short Effects of RF‐EMF on the Human Resting‐State EEG—the Inconsistencies in the Consistency. Part 1: Non‐Exposure‐Related Limitations of Comparability Between Studies
title_sort effects of rf‐emf on the human resting‐state eeg—the inconsistencies in the consistency. part 1: non‐exposure‐related limitations of comparability between studies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6619284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31215052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bem.22194
work_keys_str_mv AT dankerhopfeheidi effectsofrfemfonthehumanrestingstateeegtheinconsistenciesintheconsistencypart1nonexposurerelatedlimitationsofcomparabilitybetweenstudies
AT eggerttorsten effectsofrfemfonthehumanrestingstateeegtheinconsistenciesintheconsistencypart1nonexposurerelatedlimitationsofcomparabilitybetweenstudies
AT dornhans effectsofrfemfonthehumanrestingstateeegtheinconsistenciesintheconsistencypart1nonexposurerelatedlimitationsofcomparabilitybetweenstudies
AT sautercornelia effectsofrfemfonthehumanrestingstateeegtheinconsistenciesintheconsistencypart1nonexposurerelatedlimitationsofcomparabilitybetweenstudies