Cargando…

Augmenting subnetwork inference with information extracted from the scientific literature

Many biological studies involve either (i) manipulating some aspect of a cell or its environment and then simultaneously measuring the effect on thousands of genes, or (ii) systematically manipulating each gene and then measuring the effect on some response of interest. A common challenge that arise...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiblawi, Sid, Chasman, Deborah, Henning, Amanda, Park, Eunju, Poon, Hoifung, Gould, Michael, Ahlquist, Paul, Craven, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6619809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31246951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006758
_version_ 1783433964282707968
author Kiblawi, Sid
Chasman, Deborah
Henning, Amanda
Park, Eunju
Poon, Hoifung
Gould, Michael
Ahlquist, Paul
Craven, Mark
author_facet Kiblawi, Sid
Chasman, Deborah
Henning, Amanda
Park, Eunju
Poon, Hoifung
Gould, Michael
Ahlquist, Paul
Craven, Mark
author_sort Kiblawi, Sid
collection PubMed
description Many biological studies involve either (i) manipulating some aspect of a cell or its environment and then simultaneously measuring the effect on thousands of genes, or (ii) systematically manipulating each gene and then measuring the effect on some response of interest. A common challenge that arises in these studies is to explain how genes identified as relevant in the given experiment are organized into a subnetwork that accounts for the response of interest. The task of inferring a subnetwork is typically dependent on the information available in publicly available, structured databases, which suffer from incompleteness. However, a wealth of potentially relevant information resides in the scientific literature, such as information about genes associated with certain concepts of interest, as well as interactions that occur among various biological entities. We contend that by exploiting this information, we can improve the explanatory power and accuracy of subnetwork inference in multiple applications. Here we propose and investigate several ways in which information extracted from the scientific literature can be used to augment subnetwork inference. We show that we can use literature-extracted information to (i) augment the set of entities identified as being relevant in a subnetwork inference task, (ii) augment the set of interactions used in the process, and (iii) support targeted browsing of a large inferred subnetwork by identifying entities and interactions that are closely related to concepts of interest. We use this approach to uncover the pathways involved in interactions between a virus and a host cell, and the pathways that are regulated by a transcription factor associated with breast cancer. Our experimental results demonstrate that these approaches can provide more accurate and more interpretable subnetworks. Integer program code, background network data, and pathfinding code are available at https://github.com/Craven-Biostat-Lab/subnetwork_inference
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6619809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66198092019-07-25 Augmenting subnetwork inference with information extracted from the scientific literature Kiblawi, Sid Chasman, Deborah Henning, Amanda Park, Eunju Poon, Hoifung Gould, Michael Ahlquist, Paul Craven, Mark PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Many biological studies involve either (i) manipulating some aspect of a cell or its environment and then simultaneously measuring the effect on thousands of genes, or (ii) systematically manipulating each gene and then measuring the effect on some response of interest. A common challenge that arises in these studies is to explain how genes identified as relevant in the given experiment are organized into a subnetwork that accounts for the response of interest. The task of inferring a subnetwork is typically dependent on the information available in publicly available, structured databases, which suffer from incompleteness. However, a wealth of potentially relevant information resides in the scientific literature, such as information about genes associated with certain concepts of interest, as well as interactions that occur among various biological entities. We contend that by exploiting this information, we can improve the explanatory power and accuracy of subnetwork inference in multiple applications. Here we propose and investigate several ways in which information extracted from the scientific literature can be used to augment subnetwork inference. We show that we can use literature-extracted information to (i) augment the set of entities identified as being relevant in a subnetwork inference task, (ii) augment the set of interactions used in the process, and (iii) support targeted browsing of a large inferred subnetwork by identifying entities and interactions that are closely related to concepts of interest. We use this approach to uncover the pathways involved in interactions between a virus and a host cell, and the pathways that are regulated by a transcription factor associated with breast cancer. Our experimental results demonstrate that these approaches can provide more accurate and more interpretable subnetworks. Integer program code, background network data, and pathfinding code are available at https://github.com/Craven-Biostat-Lab/subnetwork_inference Public Library of Science 2019-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6619809/ /pubmed/31246951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006758 Text en © 2019 Kiblawi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kiblawi, Sid
Chasman, Deborah
Henning, Amanda
Park, Eunju
Poon, Hoifung
Gould, Michael
Ahlquist, Paul
Craven, Mark
Augmenting subnetwork inference with information extracted from the scientific literature
title Augmenting subnetwork inference with information extracted from the scientific literature
title_full Augmenting subnetwork inference with information extracted from the scientific literature
title_fullStr Augmenting subnetwork inference with information extracted from the scientific literature
title_full_unstemmed Augmenting subnetwork inference with information extracted from the scientific literature
title_short Augmenting subnetwork inference with information extracted from the scientific literature
title_sort augmenting subnetwork inference with information extracted from the scientific literature
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6619809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31246951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006758
work_keys_str_mv AT kiblawisid augmentingsubnetworkinferencewithinformationextractedfromthescientificliterature
AT chasmandeborah augmentingsubnetworkinferencewithinformationextractedfromthescientificliterature
AT henningamanda augmentingsubnetworkinferencewithinformationextractedfromthescientificliterature
AT parkeunju augmentingsubnetworkinferencewithinformationextractedfromthescientificliterature
AT poonhoifung augmentingsubnetworkinferencewithinformationextractedfromthescientificliterature
AT gouldmichael augmentingsubnetworkinferencewithinformationextractedfromthescientificliterature
AT ahlquistpaul augmentingsubnetworkinferencewithinformationextractedfromthescientificliterature
AT cravenmark augmentingsubnetworkinferencewithinformationextractedfromthescientificliterature