Cargando…

How do psychological characteristics of family members affected by substance use influence quality of life?

PURPOSE: Addiction is a major health stressor for families, representing an under-researched area with important policy implications. The current aim was to validate the Composite Codependency Scale, which captures the psychological characteristics of affected family members, and assess quality of l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vederhus, John-Kåre, Kristensen, Øistein, Timko, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6620238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30895489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02169-x
_version_ 1783434005182414848
author Vederhus, John-Kåre
Kristensen, Øistein
Timko, Christine
author_facet Vederhus, John-Kåre
Kristensen, Øistein
Timko, Christine
author_sort Vederhus, John-Kåre
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Addiction is a major health stressor for families, representing an under-researched area with important policy implications. The current aim was to validate the Composite Codependency Scale, which captures the psychological characteristics of affected family members, and assess quality of life as mediated by family functioning. METHODS: Close relatives (n = 271) of patients in treatment for substance use disorder (SUD) participated in a 4-day psychoeducational program. We also recruited a general population sample (n = 393) via an online social media site. Data were analyzed using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) and a latent regression model. Differences in subscale latent means were applied to ascertain how the scale discriminated the two populations. RESULTS: MGCFA yielded a shortened, nine-item partial scalar invariant scale (SCCS) that allowed comparison of latent means. The SCCS discriminated between family members and the general population, with family scoring higher on all three scale dimensions. By effect size, family had higher means (mean differences; 95% confidence intervals) for ‘emotional suppression’ (0.48; 0.36–0.59; p < 0.001; effect size, 0.92), ‘interpersonal control’ (0.47; 0.36–0.59; p < 0.001; effect size, 0.97), and ‘self-sacrifice’ (0.20; 0.10–0.29; p < 0.001; effect size, 0.43). Higher SCCS scores were associated with greater family dysfunction (β = 1.00, 95% CI 0.63–1.36; p < 0.001) and worse quality of life (β = − 0.23, 95% CI − 0.30 to − 0.16; p < 0.001), confirming the concurrent validity of the SCCS. CONCLUSION: When family members of people with addictions had the psychological characteristics of suppressing their emotions, believing they could fix others’ problems, and neglecting their own for others’ needs, they also had more family dysfunction and poorer quality of life. The SCCS offers a valid instrument for addressing the life situation of affected families. This scale can help clinicians focus on family members within health services, especially within SUD treatment services. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-019-02169-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6620238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66202382019-07-28 How do psychological characteristics of family members affected by substance use influence quality of life? Vederhus, John-Kåre Kristensen, Øistein Timko, Christine Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: Addiction is a major health stressor for families, representing an under-researched area with important policy implications. The current aim was to validate the Composite Codependency Scale, which captures the psychological characteristics of affected family members, and assess quality of life as mediated by family functioning. METHODS: Close relatives (n = 271) of patients in treatment for substance use disorder (SUD) participated in a 4-day psychoeducational program. We also recruited a general population sample (n = 393) via an online social media site. Data were analyzed using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) and a latent regression model. Differences in subscale latent means were applied to ascertain how the scale discriminated the two populations. RESULTS: MGCFA yielded a shortened, nine-item partial scalar invariant scale (SCCS) that allowed comparison of latent means. The SCCS discriminated between family members and the general population, with family scoring higher on all three scale dimensions. By effect size, family had higher means (mean differences; 95% confidence intervals) for ‘emotional suppression’ (0.48; 0.36–0.59; p < 0.001; effect size, 0.92), ‘interpersonal control’ (0.47; 0.36–0.59; p < 0.001; effect size, 0.97), and ‘self-sacrifice’ (0.20; 0.10–0.29; p < 0.001; effect size, 0.43). Higher SCCS scores were associated with greater family dysfunction (β = 1.00, 95% CI 0.63–1.36; p < 0.001) and worse quality of life (β = − 0.23, 95% CI − 0.30 to − 0.16; p < 0.001), confirming the concurrent validity of the SCCS. CONCLUSION: When family members of people with addictions had the psychological characteristics of suppressing their emotions, believing they could fix others’ problems, and neglecting their own for others’ needs, they also had more family dysfunction and poorer quality of life. The SCCS offers a valid instrument for addressing the life situation of affected families. This scale can help clinicians focus on family members within health services, especially within SUD treatment services. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-019-02169-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-03-20 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6620238/ /pubmed/30895489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02169-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Vederhus, John-Kåre
Kristensen, Øistein
Timko, Christine
How do psychological characteristics of family members affected by substance use influence quality of life?
title How do psychological characteristics of family members affected by substance use influence quality of life?
title_full How do psychological characteristics of family members affected by substance use influence quality of life?
title_fullStr How do psychological characteristics of family members affected by substance use influence quality of life?
title_full_unstemmed How do psychological characteristics of family members affected by substance use influence quality of life?
title_short How do psychological characteristics of family members affected by substance use influence quality of life?
title_sort how do psychological characteristics of family members affected by substance use influence quality of life?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6620238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30895489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02169-x
work_keys_str_mv AT vederhusjohnkare howdopsychologicalcharacteristicsoffamilymembersaffectedbysubstanceuseinfluencequalityoflife
AT kristensenøistein howdopsychologicalcharacteristicsoffamilymembersaffectedbysubstanceuseinfluencequalityoflife
AT timkochristine howdopsychologicalcharacteristicsoffamilymembersaffectedbysubstanceuseinfluencequalityoflife