Cargando…
Measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the German language OxCAP-MH capability instrument
PURPOSE: The OxCAP-MH capabilities questionnaire was developed and validated in the UK for outcome measurement in mental health clinical studies. Its broader wellbeing construct or validity in routine mental health services so far has not been assessed. The objectives were to investigate the extent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6620251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31030365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02187-9 |
_version_ | 1783434008239013888 |
---|---|
author | Łaszewska, Agata Schwab, Markus Leutner, Eva Oberrauter, Marold Spiel, Georg Simon, Judit |
author_facet | Łaszewska, Agata Schwab, Markus Leutner, Eva Oberrauter, Marold Spiel, Georg Simon, Judit |
author_sort | Łaszewska, Agata |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The OxCAP-MH capabilities questionnaire was developed and validated in the UK for outcome measurement in mental health clinical studies. Its broader wellbeing construct or validity in routine mental health services so far has not been assessed. The objectives were to investigate the extent the OxCAP-MH measures broader wellbeing compared to the EQ-5D-5L and to test psychometric properties of the German language OxCAP-MH in routine mental health services in Austria. METHODS: Study sample consisted of patients in socio-psychiatric services (n = 159) assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Underlying factors associated with quality-of-life/wellbeing concepts measured by the OxCAP-MH and EQ-5D-5L were identified in exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Responsiveness was assessed using anchor questionnaires and standardised response mean (SRM). For discriminant validity, subgroups of respondents were compared using t test and one-way ANOVA. Test–retest analysis was assessed for a period of maximum 30 days from the baseline assessment with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: EFA identified a two-factor structure. All EQ-5D-5L items and seven OxCAP-MH items loaded on one factor and nine remaining OxCAP-MH items loaded on a separate factor. Responsiveness was found for patients who improved in anchor questionnaire scores with large or moderate SRM statistics. OxCAP-MH discriminated between various groups in univariable and multivariable analyses. Reliability of the German language OxCAP-MH was confirmed by ICC of 0.80. CONCLUSIONS: Besides providing evidence that the OxCAP-MH measures broader wellbeing constructs beyond traditional health-related quality of life, the study also confirms the validity of the instrument for implementation in routine evaluation of mental health services. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-019-02187-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6620251 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66202512019-07-28 Measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the German language OxCAP-MH capability instrument Łaszewska, Agata Schwab, Markus Leutner, Eva Oberrauter, Marold Spiel, Georg Simon, Judit Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: The OxCAP-MH capabilities questionnaire was developed and validated in the UK for outcome measurement in mental health clinical studies. Its broader wellbeing construct or validity in routine mental health services so far has not been assessed. The objectives were to investigate the extent the OxCAP-MH measures broader wellbeing compared to the EQ-5D-5L and to test psychometric properties of the German language OxCAP-MH in routine mental health services in Austria. METHODS: Study sample consisted of patients in socio-psychiatric services (n = 159) assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Underlying factors associated with quality-of-life/wellbeing concepts measured by the OxCAP-MH and EQ-5D-5L were identified in exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Responsiveness was assessed using anchor questionnaires and standardised response mean (SRM). For discriminant validity, subgroups of respondents were compared using t test and one-way ANOVA. Test–retest analysis was assessed for a period of maximum 30 days from the baseline assessment with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: EFA identified a two-factor structure. All EQ-5D-5L items and seven OxCAP-MH items loaded on one factor and nine remaining OxCAP-MH items loaded on a separate factor. Responsiveness was found for patients who improved in anchor questionnaire scores with large or moderate SRM statistics. OxCAP-MH discriminated between various groups in univariable and multivariable analyses. Reliability of the German language OxCAP-MH was confirmed by ICC of 0.80. CONCLUSIONS: Besides providing evidence that the OxCAP-MH measures broader wellbeing constructs beyond traditional health-related quality of life, the study also confirms the validity of the instrument for implementation in routine evaluation of mental health services. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-019-02187-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-04-27 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6620251/ /pubmed/31030365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02187-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Łaszewska, Agata Schwab, Markus Leutner, Eva Oberrauter, Marold Spiel, Georg Simon, Judit Measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the German language OxCAP-MH capability instrument |
title | Measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the German language OxCAP-MH capability instrument |
title_full | Measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the German language OxCAP-MH capability instrument |
title_fullStr | Measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the German language OxCAP-MH capability instrument |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the German language OxCAP-MH capability instrument |
title_short | Measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the German language OxCAP-MH capability instrument |
title_sort | measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the german language oxcap-mh capability instrument |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6620251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31030365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02187-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT łaszewskaagata measuringbroaderwellbeinginmentalhealthservicesvalidityofthegermanlanguageoxcapmhcapabilityinstrument AT schwabmarkus measuringbroaderwellbeinginmentalhealthservicesvalidityofthegermanlanguageoxcapmhcapabilityinstrument AT leutnereva measuringbroaderwellbeinginmentalhealthservicesvalidityofthegermanlanguageoxcapmhcapabilityinstrument AT oberrautermarold measuringbroaderwellbeinginmentalhealthservicesvalidityofthegermanlanguageoxcapmhcapabilityinstrument AT spielgeorg measuringbroaderwellbeinginmentalhealthservicesvalidityofthegermanlanguageoxcapmhcapabilityinstrument AT simonjudit measuringbroaderwellbeinginmentalhealthservicesvalidityofthegermanlanguageoxcapmhcapabilityinstrument |