Cargando…

Measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the German language OxCAP-MH capability instrument

PURPOSE: The OxCAP-MH capabilities questionnaire was developed and validated in the UK for outcome measurement in mental health clinical studies. Its broader wellbeing construct or validity in routine mental health services so far has not been assessed. The objectives were to investigate the extent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Łaszewska, Agata, Schwab, Markus, Leutner, Eva, Oberrauter, Marold, Spiel, Georg, Simon, Judit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6620251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31030365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02187-9
_version_ 1783434008239013888
author Łaszewska, Agata
Schwab, Markus
Leutner, Eva
Oberrauter, Marold
Spiel, Georg
Simon, Judit
author_facet Łaszewska, Agata
Schwab, Markus
Leutner, Eva
Oberrauter, Marold
Spiel, Georg
Simon, Judit
author_sort Łaszewska, Agata
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The OxCAP-MH capabilities questionnaire was developed and validated in the UK for outcome measurement in mental health clinical studies. Its broader wellbeing construct or validity in routine mental health services so far has not been assessed. The objectives were to investigate the extent the OxCAP-MH measures broader wellbeing compared to the EQ-5D-5L and to test psychometric properties of the German language OxCAP-MH in routine mental health services in Austria. METHODS: Study sample consisted of patients in socio-psychiatric services (n = 159) assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Underlying factors associated with quality-of-life/wellbeing concepts measured by the OxCAP-MH and EQ-5D-5L were identified in exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Responsiveness was assessed using anchor questionnaires and standardised response mean (SRM). For discriminant validity, subgroups of respondents were compared using t test and one-way ANOVA. Test–retest analysis was assessed for a period of maximum 30 days from the baseline assessment with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: EFA identified a two-factor structure. All EQ-5D-5L items and seven OxCAP-MH items loaded on one factor and nine remaining OxCAP-MH items loaded on a separate factor. Responsiveness was found for patients who improved in anchor questionnaire scores with large or moderate SRM statistics. OxCAP-MH discriminated between various groups in univariable and multivariable analyses. Reliability of the German language OxCAP-MH was confirmed by ICC of 0.80. CONCLUSIONS: Besides providing evidence that the OxCAP-MH measures broader wellbeing constructs beyond traditional health-related quality of life, the study also confirms the validity of the instrument for implementation in routine evaluation of mental health services. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-019-02187-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6620251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66202512019-07-28 Measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the German language OxCAP-MH capability instrument Łaszewska, Agata Schwab, Markus Leutner, Eva Oberrauter, Marold Spiel, Georg Simon, Judit Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: The OxCAP-MH capabilities questionnaire was developed and validated in the UK for outcome measurement in mental health clinical studies. Its broader wellbeing construct or validity in routine mental health services so far has not been assessed. The objectives were to investigate the extent the OxCAP-MH measures broader wellbeing compared to the EQ-5D-5L and to test psychometric properties of the German language OxCAP-MH in routine mental health services in Austria. METHODS: Study sample consisted of patients in socio-psychiatric services (n = 159) assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Underlying factors associated with quality-of-life/wellbeing concepts measured by the OxCAP-MH and EQ-5D-5L were identified in exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Responsiveness was assessed using anchor questionnaires and standardised response mean (SRM). For discriminant validity, subgroups of respondents were compared using t test and one-way ANOVA. Test–retest analysis was assessed for a period of maximum 30 days from the baseline assessment with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: EFA identified a two-factor structure. All EQ-5D-5L items and seven OxCAP-MH items loaded on one factor and nine remaining OxCAP-MH items loaded on a separate factor. Responsiveness was found for patients who improved in anchor questionnaire scores with large or moderate SRM statistics. OxCAP-MH discriminated between various groups in univariable and multivariable analyses. Reliability of the German language OxCAP-MH was confirmed by ICC of 0.80. CONCLUSIONS: Besides providing evidence that the OxCAP-MH measures broader wellbeing constructs beyond traditional health-related quality of life, the study also confirms the validity of the instrument for implementation in routine evaluation of mental health services. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-019-02187-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-04-27 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6620251/ /pubmed/31030365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02187-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Łaszewska, Agata
Schwab, Markus
Leutner, Eva
Oberrauter, Marold
Spiel, Georg
Simon, Judit
Measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the German language OxCAP-MH capability instrument
title Measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the German language OxCAP-MH capability instrument
title_full Measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the German language OxCAP-MH capability instrument
title_fullStr Measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the German language OxCAP-MH capability instrument
title_full_unstemmed Measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the German language OxCAP-MH capability instrument
title_short Measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the German language OxCAP-MH capability instrument
title_sort measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the german language oxcap-mh capability instrument
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6620251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31030365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02187-9
work_keys_str_mv AT łaszewskaagata measuringbroaderwellbeinginmentalhealthservicesvalidityofthegermanlanguageoxcapmhcapabilityinstrument
AT schwabmarkus measuringbroaderwellbeinginmentalhealthservicesvalidityofthegermanlanguageoxcapmhcapabilityinstrument
AT leutnereva measuringbroaderwellbeinginmentalhealthservicesvalidityofthegermanlanguageoxcapmhcapabilityinstrument
AT oberrautermarold measuringbroaderwellbeinginmentalhealthservicesvalidityofthegermanlanguageoxcapmhcapabilityinstrument
AT spielgeorg measuringbroaderwellbeinginmentalhealthservicesvalidityofthegermanlanguageoxcapmhcapabilityinstrument
AT simonjudit measuringbroaderwellbeinginmentalhealthservicesvalidityofthegermanlanguageoxcapmhcapabilityinstrument