Cargando…

The Metabolic Cost of Walking in healthy young and older adults – A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

The Metabolic Cost of Walking (MCoW) is an important variable of daily life that has been studied extensively. Several studies suggest that MCoW is higher in Older Adults (OA) than in Young Adults (YA). However, it is difficult to compare values across studies due to differences in the way MCoW was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Das Gupta, Sauvik, Bobbert, Maarten F., Kistemaker, Dinant A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6620279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31292471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45602-4
_version_ 1783434014500061184
author Das Gupta, Sauvik
Bobbert, Maarten F.
Kistemaker, Dinant A.
author_facet Das Gupta, Sauvik
Bobbert, Maarten F.
Kistemaker, Dinant A.
author_sort Das Gupta, Sauvik
collection PubMed
description The Metabolic Cost of Walking (MCoW) is an important variable of daily life that has been studied extensively. Several studies suggest that MCoW is higher in Older Adults (OA) than in Young Adults (YA). However, it is difficult to compare values across studies due to differences in the way MCoW was expressed, the units in which it was reported and the walking speed at which it was measured. To provide an overview of MCoW in OA and YA and to investigate the quantitative effect of age on MCoW, we have conducted a literature review and performed two meta-analyses. We extracted data on MCoW in healthy YA (18–41 years old) and healthy OA (≥59 years old) and calculated, if not already reported, the Gross (GCoW) and Net MCoW (NCoW) in J/kg/m. If studies reported MCoW measured at multiple speeds, we selected those values for YA and OA at which MCoW was minimal. All studies directly comparing YA and OA were selected for meta-analyses. From all studies reviewed, the average GCoW in YA was 3.4 ± 0.4 J/kg/m and 3.8 ± 0.4 J/kg/m in OA (~12% more in OA), and the average NCoW in YA was 2.4 ± 0.4 J/kg/m and 2.8 ± 0.5 J/kg/m in OA (~17% more in OA). Our meta-analyses indicated a statistically significant elevation of both GCoW and NCoW (p < 0.001) for OA. In terms of GCoW, OA expended about 0.3 J/kg/m more metabolic energy than YA and about 0.4 J/kg/m more metabolic energy than YA in terms of NCoW. Our study showed a statistically significant elevation in MCoW of OA over YA. However, from the literature it is unclear if this elevation is directly caused by age or due to an interaction between age and methodology. We recommend further research comparing MCoW in healthy OA and YA during “natural” over-ground walking and treadmill walking, after sufficient familiarization time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6620279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66202792019-07-18 The Metabolic Cost of Walking in healthy young and older adults – A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis Das Gupta, Sauvik Bobbert, Maarten F. Kistemaker, Dinant A. Sci Rep Article The Metabolic Cost of Walking (MCoW) is an important variable of daily life that has been studied extensively. Several studies suggest that MCoW is higher in Older Adults (OA) than in Young Adults (YA). However, it is difficult to compare values across studies due to differences in the way MCoW was expressed, the units in which it was reported and the walking speed at which it was measured. To provide an overview of MCoW in OA and YA and to investigate the quantitative effect of age on MCoW, we have conducted a literature review and performed two meta-analyses. We extracted data on MCoW in healthy YA (18–41 years old) and healthy OA (≥59 years old) and calculated, if not already reported, the Gross (GCoW) and Net MCoW (NCoW) in J/kg/m. If studies reported MCoW measured at multiple speeds, we selected those values for YA and OA at which MCoW was minimal. All studies directly comparing YA and OA were selected for meta-analyses. From all studies reviewed, the average GCoW in YA was 3.4 ± 0.4 J/kg/m and 3.8 ± 0.4 J/kg/m in OA (~12% more in OA), and the average NCoW in YA was 2.4 ± 0.4 J/kg/m and 2.8 ± 0.5 J/kg/m in OA (~17% more in OA). Our meta-analyses indicated a statistically significant elevation of both GCoW and NCoW (p < 0.001) for OA. In terms of GCoW, OA expended about 0.3 J/kg/m more metabolic energy than YA and about 0.4 J/kg/m more metabolic energy than YA in terms of NCoW. Our study showed a statistically significant elevation in MCoW of OA over YA. However, from the literature it is unclear if this elevation is directly caused by age or due to an interaction between age and methodology. We recommend further research comparing MCoW in healthy OA and YA during “natural” over-ground walking and treadmill walking, after sufficient familiarization time. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6620279/ /pubmed/31292471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45602-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Das Gupta, Sauvik
Bobbert, Maarten F.
Kistemaker, Dinant A.
The Metabolic Cost of Walking in healthy young and older adults – A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
title The Metabolic Cost of Walking in healthy young and older adults – A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
title_full The Metabolic Cost of Walking in healthy young and older adults – A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
title_fullStr The Metabolic Cost of Walking in healthy young and older adults – A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Metabolic Cost of Walking in healthy young and older adults – A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
title_short The Metabolic Cost of Walking in healthy young and older adults – A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
title_sort metabolic cost of walking in healthy young and older adults – a systematic review and meta analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6620279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31292471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45602-4
work_keys_str_mv AT dasguptasauvik themetaboliccostofwalkinginhealthyyoungandolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bobbertmaartenf themetaboliccostofwalkinginhealthyyoungandolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kistemakerdinanta themetaboliccostofwalkinginhealthyyoungandolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dasguptasauvik metaboliccostofwalkinginhealthyyoungandolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bobbertmaartenf metaboliccostofwalkinginhealthyyoungandolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kistemakerdinanta metaboliccostofwalkinginhealthyyoungandolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis