Cargando…
Unilateral cleft lip: evaluation and comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques based on qualitative (subject/guardian and professional) assessment
OBJECTIVES: The outcomes of the treatment of unilateral cleft lip can vary considerably due to variations in repair techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare treatment outcomes of surgical repair of unilateral cleft lip using either the Tennison–Randall or Millard technique based...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6620301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31334102 http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.3.141 |
_version_ | 1783434019675832320 |
---|---|
author | Adetayo, Adekunle Moses Adetayo, Modupe Olushola Adeyemo, Wasiu Lanre James, Olutayo O. Adeyemi, Michael O. |
author_facet | Adetayo, Adekunle Moses Adetayo, Modupe Olushola Adeyemo, Wasiu Lanre James, Olutayo O. Adeyemi, Michael O. |
author_sort | Adetayo, Adekunle Moses |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The outcomes of the treatment of unilateral cleft lip can vary considerably due to variations in repair techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare treatment outcomes of surgical repair of unilateral cleft lip using either the Tennison–Randall or Millard technique based on (qualitative) parent/subject and professional assessments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled study conducted at Lagos University Teaching Hospital between January 2013 and July 2014. A total of 56 subjects with unilateral cleft lip presenting for primary surgery who satisfied the inclusion criteria were recruited for the study. Subjects were randomly allocated to surgical groups A or B through balloting. Group A underwent cleft repair with the Tennison–Randall technique, while group B underwent cleft repair with the Millard rotation advancement technique. Surgical outcome was assessed using qualitative evaluation by the guardian/subject and independent assessors based on a modified form of the criteria described by Christofides and colleagues. RESULTS: Of the 56 subjects enrolled in this study, 32 were male, with a male to female ratio of 1.3:1. Fifteen of the guardians/subjects in the Tennison–Randall group were most bothered about the lower part of the residual lip scar, while 12 guardians/subjects in the in the Millard group were most bothered about the upper part of the scar. More noses were judged to be flattened in the Millard group than in the Tennison–Randall group. Assessors observed a striking disparity in scar transgression of the philtral ridges between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Essentially, there were no major difference in the overall results between Millard rotation-advancement and Tennison–Randall repairs. Both Millard and Tennison–Randall's techniques require significant improvements to improve the appearance of the scar on the upper part and lower part of the lip, respectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6620301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66203012019-07-22 Unilateral cleft lip: evaluation and comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques based on qualitative (subject/guardian and professional) assessment Adetayo, Adekunle Moses Adetayo, Modupe Olushola Adeyemo, Wasiu Lanre James, Olutayo O. Adeyemi, Michael O. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: The outcomes of the treatment of unilateral cleft lip can vary considerably due to variations in repair techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare treatment outcomes of surgical repair of unilateral cleft lip using either the Tennison–Randall or Millard technique based on (qualitative) parent/subject and professional assessments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled study conducted at Lagos University Teaching Hospital between January 2013 and July 2014. A total of 56 subjects with unilateral cleft lip presenting for primary surgery who satisfied the inclusion criteria were recruited for the study. Subjects were randomly allocated to surgical groups A or B through balloting. Group A underwent cleft repair with the Tennison–Randall technique, while group B underwent cleft repair with the Millard rotation advancement technique. Surgical outcome was assessed using qualitative evaluation by the guardian/subject and independent assessors based on a modified form of the criteria described by Christofides and colleagues. RESULTS: Of the 56 subjects enrolled in this study, 32 were male, with a male to female ratio of 1.3:1. Fifteen of the guardians/subjects in the Tennison–Randall group were most bothered about the lower part of the residual lip scar, while 12 guardians/subjects in the in the Millard group were most bothered about the upper part of the scar. More noses were judged to be flattened in the Millard group than in the Tennison–Randall group. Assessors observed a striking disparity in scar transgression of the philtral ridges between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Essentially, there were no major difference in the overall results between Millard rotation-advancement and Tennison–Randall repairs. Both Millard and Tennison–Randall's techniques require significant improvements to improve the appearance of the scar on the upper part and lower part of the lip, respectively. The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2019-06 2019-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6620301/ /pubmed/31334102 http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.3.141 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Adetayo, Adekunle Moses Adetayo, Modupe Olushola Adeyemo, Wasiu Lanre James, Olutayo O. Adeyemi, Michael O. Unilateral cleft lip: evaluation and comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques based on qualitative (subject/guardian and professional) assessment |
title | Unilateral cleft lip: evaluation and comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques based on qualitative (subject/guardian and professional) assessment |
title_full | Unilateral cleft lip: evaluation and comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques based on qualitative (subject/guardian and professional) assessment |
title_fullStr | Unilateral cleft lip: evaluation and comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques based on qualitative (subject/guardian and professional) assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Unilateral cleft lip: evaluation and comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques based on qualitative (subject/guardian and professional) assessment |
title_short | Unilateral cleft lip: evaluation and comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques based on qualitative (subject/guardian and professional) assessment |
title_sort | unilateral cleft lip: evaluation and comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques based on qualitative (subject/guardian and professional) assessment |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6620301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31334102 http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.3.141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adetayoadekunlemoses unilateralcleftlipevaluationandcomparisonoftreatmentoutcomewithtwosurgicaltechniquesbasedonqualitativesubjectguardianandprofessionalassessment AT adetayomodupeolushola unilateralcleftlipevaluationandcomparisonoftreatmentoutcomewithtwosurgicaltechniquesbasedonqualitativesubjectguardianandprofessionalassessment AT adeyemowasiulanre unilateralcleftlipevaluationandcomparisonoftreatmentoutcomewithtwosurgicaltechniquesbasedonqualitativesubjectguardianandprofessionalassessment AT jamesolutayoo unilateralcleftlipevaluationandcomparisonoftreatmentoutcomewithtwosurgicaltechniquesbasedonqualitativesubjectguardianandprofessionalassessment AT adeyemimichaelo unilateralcleftlipevaluationandcomparisonoftreatmentoutcomewithtwosurgicaltechniquesbasedonqualitativesubjectguardianandprofessionalassessment |