Cargando…

Unilateral cleft lip: evaluation and comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques based on qualitative (subject/guardian and professional) assessment

OBJECTIVES: The outcomes of the treatment of unilateral cleft lip can vary considerably due to variations in repair techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare treatment outcomes of surgical repair of unilateral cleft lip using either the Tennison–Randall or Millard technique based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adetayo, Adekunle Moses, Adetayo, Modupe Olushola, Adeyemo, Wasiu Lanre, James, Olutayo O., Adeyemi, Michael O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6620301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31334102
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.3.141
_version_ 1783434019675832320
author Adetayo, Adekunle Moses
Adetayo, Modupe Olushola
Adeyemo, Wasiu Lanre
James, Olutayo O.
Adeyemi, Michael O.
author_facet Adetayo, Adekunle Moses
Adetayo, Modupe Olushola
Adeyemo, Wasiu Lanre
James, Olutayo O.
Adeyemi, Michael O.
author_sort Adetayo, Adekunle Moses
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The outcomes of the treatment of unilateral cleft lip can vary considerably due to variations in repair techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare treatment outcomes of surgical repair of unilateral cleft lip using either the Tennison–Randall or Millard technique based on (qualitative) parent/subject and professional assessments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled study conducted at Lagos University Teaching Hospital between January 2013 and July 2014. A total of 56 subjects with unilateral cleft lip presenting for primary surgery who satisfied the inclusion criteria were recruited for the study. Subjects were randomly allocated to surgical groups A or B through balloting. Group A underwent cleft repair with the Tennison–Randall technique, while group B underwent cleft repair with the Millard rotation advancement technique. Surgical outcome was assessed using qualitative evaluation by the guardian/subject and independent assessors based on a modified form of the criteria described by Christofides and colleagues. RESULTS: Of the 56 subjects enrolled in this study, 32 were male, with a male to female ratio of 1.3:1. Fifteen of the guardians/subjects in the Tennison–Randall group were most bothered about the lower part of the residual lip scar, while 12 guardians/subjects in the in the Millard group were most bothered about the upper part of the scar. More noses were judged to be flattened in the Millard group than in the Tennison–Randall group. Assessors observed a striking disparity in scar transgression of the philtral ridges between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Essentially, there were no major difference in the overall results between Millard rotation-advancement and Tennison–Randall repairs. Both Millard and Tennison–Randall's techniques require significant improvements to improve the appearance of the scar on the upper part and lower part of the lip, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6620301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66203012019-07-22 Unilateral cleft lip: evaluation and comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques based on qualitative (subject/guardian and professional) assessment Adetayo, Adekunle Moses Adetayo, Modupe Olushola Adeyemo, Wasiu Lanre James, Olutayo O. Adeyemi, Michael O. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: The outcomes of the treatment of unilateral cleft lip can vary considerably due to variations in repair techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare treatment outcomes of surgical repair of unilateral cleft lip using either the Tennison–Randall or Millard technique based on (qualitative) parent/subject and professional assessments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled study conducted at Lagos University Teaching Hospital between January 2013 and July 2014. A total of 56 subjects with unilateral cleft lip presenting for primary surgery who satisfied the inclusion criteria were recruited for the study. Subjects were randomly allocated to surgical groups A or B through balloting. Group A underwent cleft repair with the Tennison–Randall technique, while group B underwent cleft repair with the Millard rotation advancement technique. Surgical outcome was assessed using qualitative evaluation by the guardian/subject and independent assessors based on a modified form of the criteria described by Christofides and colleagues. RESULTS: Of the 56 subjects enrolled in this study, 32 were male, with a male to female ratio of 1.3:1. Fifteen of the guardians/subjects in the Tennison–Randall group were most bothered about the lower part of the residual lip scar, while 12 guardians/subjects in the in the Millard group were most bothered about the upper part of the scar. More noses were judged to be flattened in the Millard group than in the Tennison–Randall group. Assessors observed a striking disparity in scar transgression of the philtral ridges between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Essentially, there were no major difference in the overall results between Millard rotation-advancement and Tennison–Randall repairs. Both Millard and Tennison–Randall's techniques require significant improvements to improve the appearance of the scar on the upper part and lower part of the lip, respectively. The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2019-06 2019-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6620301/ /pubmed/31334102 http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.3.141 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Adetayo, Adekunle Moses
Adetayo, Modupe Olushola
Adeyemo, Wasiu Lanre
James, Olutayo O.
Adeyemi, Michael O.
Unilateral cleft lip: evaluation and comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques based on qualitative (subject/guardian and professional) assessment
title Unilateral cleft lip: evaluation and comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques based on qualitative (subject/guardian and professional) assessment
title_full Unilateral cleft lip: evaluation and comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques based on qualitative (subject/guardian and professional) assessment
title_fullStr Unilateral cleft lip: evaluation and comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques based on qualitative (subject/guardian and professional) assessment
title_full_unstemmed Unilateral cleft lip: evaluation and comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques based on qualitative (subject/guardian and professional) assessment
title_short Unilateral cleft lip: evaluation and comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques based on qualitative (subject/guardian and professional) assessment
title_sort unilateral cleft lip: evaluation and comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques based on qualitative (subject/guardian and professional) assessment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6620301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31334102
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.3.141
work_keys_str_mv AT adetayoadekunlemoses unilateralcleftlipevaluationandcomparisonoftreatmentoutcomewithtwosurgicaltechniquesbasedonqualitativesubjectguardianandprofessionalassessment
AT adetayomodupeolushola unilateralcleftlipevaluationandcomparisonoftreatmentoutcomewithtwosurgicaltechniquesbasedonqualitativesubjectguardianandprofessionalassessment
AT adeyemowasiulanre unilateralcleftlipevaluationandcomparisonoftreatmentoutcomewithtwosurgicaltechniquesbasedonqualitativesubjectguardianandprofessionalassessment
AT jamesolutayoo unilateralcleftlipevaluationandcomparisonoftreatmentoutcomewithtwosurgicaltechniquesbasedonqualitativesubjectguardianandprofessionalassessment
AT adeyemimichaelo unilateralcleftlipevaluationandcomparisonoftreatmentoutcomewithtwosurgicaltechniquesbasedonqualitativesubjectguardianandprofessionalassessment