Cargando…

Intersectional effects of racial and gender discrimination on cardiovascular health vary among black and white women and men in the CARDIA study

Testing hypotheses from the emerging Identity Pathology (IP) framework, we assessed race-gender differences in the effects of reporting experiences of racial and gender discrimination simultaneously compared with racial or gender discrimination alone, or no discrimination, on future cardiovascular h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bey, G.S., Jesdale, B., Forrester, S., Person, S.D., Kiefe, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6620618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31334327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100446
_version_ 1783434082024161280
author Bey, G.S.
Jesdale, B.
Forrester, S.
Person, S.D.
Kiefe, C.
author_facet Bey, G.S.
Jesdale, B.
Forrester, S.
Person, S.D.
Kiefe, C.
author_sort Bey, G.S.
collection PubMed
description Testing hypotheses from the emerging Identity Pathology (IP) framework, we assessed race-gender differences in the effects of reporting experiences of racial and gender discrimination simultaneously compared with racial or gender discrimination alone, or no discrimination, on future cardiovascular health (CVH). Data were from a sample of 3758 black or white adults in CARDIA, a community-based cohort recruited in Birmingham, AL; Chicago, IL; Minneapolis, MN, and Oakland, CA in 1985–6 (year 0). Racial and gender discrimination were assessed using the Experiences of Discrimination scale. CVH was evaluated using a 12-point composite outcome modified from the Life's Simple 7, with higher scores indicating better health. Multivariable linear regressions were used to evaluate the associations between different perceptions of discrimination and CVH scores two decades later by race and gender simultaneously. Reporting racial and gender discrimination in ≥2 settings were 48% of black women, 42% of black men, 10% of white women, and 5% of white men. Year 30 CVH scores (mean, SD) were 7.9(1.4), 8.1(1.6), 8.8(1.6), and 8.7(1.3), respectively. Compared with those of their race-gender groups reporting no discrimination, white women reporting only gender-based discrimination saw an adjusted score difference of +0.3 (95% CI: 0.0,0.6), whereas white men reporting only racial discrimination had on average a 0.4 (95% CI: 0.1,0.8) higher score, and scores among white men reporting both racial and gender discrimination were on average 0.6 (95% CI: 1.1,-0.1) lower than those of their group reporting no discrimination. Consistent with predictions of the IP model, the associations of reported racial and gender discrimination with future CVH were different for different racially-defined gender groups. More research is needed to understand why reported racial and gender discrimination might better predict deterioration in CVH for whites than blacks, and what additional factors associated with gender and race contribute variability to CVH among these groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6620618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66206182019-07-22 Intersectional effects of racial and gender discrimination on cardiovascular health vary among black and white women and men in the CARDIA study Bey, G.S. Jesdale, B. Forrester, S. Person, S.D. Kiefe, C. SSM Popul Health Article Testing hypotheses from the emerging Identity Pathology (IP) framework, we assessed race-gender differences in the effects of reporting experiences of racial and gender discrimination simultaneously compared with racial or gender discrimination alone, or no discrimination, on future cardiovascular health (CVH). Data were from a sample of 3758 black or white adults in CARDIA, a community-based cohort recruited in Birmingham, AL; Chicago, IL; Minneapolis, MN, and Oakland, CA in 1985–6 (year 0). Racial and gender discrimination were assessed using the Experiences of Discrimination scale. CVH was evaluated using a 12-point composite outcome modified from the Life's Simple 7, with higher scores indicating better health. Multivariable linear regressions were used to evaluate the associations between different perceptions of discrimination and CVH scores two decades later by race and gender simultaneously. Reporting racial and gender discrimination in ≥2 settings were 48% of black women, 42% of black men, 10% of white women, and 5% of white men. Year 30 CVH scores (mean, SD) were 7.9(1.4), 8.1(1.6), 8.8(1.6), and 8.7(1.3), respectively. Compared with those of their race-gender groups reporting no discrimination, white women reporting only gender-based discrimination saw an adjusted score difference of +0.3 (95% CI: 0.0,0.6), whereas white men reporting only racial discrimination had on average a 0.4 (95% CI: 0.1,0.8) higher score, and scores among white men reporting both racial and gender discrimination were on average 0.6 (95% CI: 1.1,-0.1) lower than those of their group reporting no discrimination. Consistent with predictions of the IP model, the associations of reported racial and gender discrimination with future CVH were different for different racially-defined gender groups. More research is needed to understand why reported racial and gender discrimination might better predict deterioration in CVH for whites than blacks, and what additional factors associated with gender and race contribute variability to CVH among these groups. Elsevier 2019-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6620618/ /pubmed/31334327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100446 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bey, G.S.
Jesdale, B.
Forrester, S.
Person, S.D.
Kiefe, C.
Intersectional effects of racial and gender discrimination on cardiovascular health vary among black and white women and men in the CARDIA study
title Intersectional effects of racial and gender discrimination on cardiovascular health vary among black and white women and men in the CARDIA study
title_full Intersectional effects of racial and gender discrimination on cardiovascular health vary among black and white women and men in the CARDIA study
title_fullStr Intersectional effects of racial and gender discrimination on cardiovascular health vary among black and white women and men in the CARDIA study
title_full_unstemmed Intersectional effects of racial and gender discrimination on cardiovascular health vary among black and white women and men in the CARDIA study
title_short Intersectional effects of racial and gender discrimination on cardiovascular health vary among black and white women and men in the CARDIA study
title_sort intersectional effects of racial and gender discrimination on cardiovascular health vary among black and white women and men in the cardia study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6620618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31334327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100446
work_keys_str_mv AT beygs intersectionaleffectsofracialandgenderdiscriminationoncardiovascularhealthvaryamongblackandwhitewomenandmeninthecardiastudy
AT jesdaleb intersectionaleffectsofracialandgenderdiscriminationoncardiovascularhealthvaryamongblackandwhitewomenandmeninthecardiastudy
AT forresters intersectionaleffectsofracialandgenderdiscriminationoncardiovascularhealthvaryamongblackandwhitewomenandmeninthecardiastudy
AT personsd intersectionaleffectsofracialandgenderdiscriminationoncardiovascularhealthvaryamongblackandwhitewomenandmeninthecardiastudy
AT kiefec intersectionaleffectsofracialandgenderdiscriminationoncardiovascularhealthvaryamongblackandwhitewomenandmeninthecardiastudy