Cargando…

The Effectiveness of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma Application in the Wound Bed Prior to Resurfacing with Split Thickness Skin Graft vs. Conventional Mechanical Fixation Using Sutures and Staples

BACKGROUND: Autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) has significant benefits facilitating improved graft take on wound beds due to hemostasis, adhesive and healing properties. This study aimed at effective use of PRP in wound beds on graft take irrespective of etiology as compared to conventional meth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhua, Subha, Suhas, TR, Tilak, BG
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6620803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31309055
http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/wjps.8.2.185
_version_ 1783434099301548032
author Dhua, Subha
Suhas, TR
Tilak, BG
author_facet Dhua, Subha
Suhas, TR
Tilak, BG
author_sort Dhua, Subha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) has significant benefits facilitating improved graft take on wound beds due to hemostasis, adhesive and healing properties. This study aimed at effective use of PRP in wound beds on graft take irrespective of etiology as compared to conventional methods of mechanical fixation using sutures and staples. METHODS: Forty cases including 20 in control and 20 in PRP groups admitted to the Department of Plastic Surgery at Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore were enrolled between October 2015 and September 2017. Freshly prepared autologous PRP was applied on wound beds in the treated group, while conventional mechanical fixation methods like staples and sutures were used in the control group for the fixation of the skin grafts. RESULTS: Most significant result was the instant graft take to the wound bed irrespective of the etiology besides hemostasis and healing properties in the PRP treated group which resulted in considerable reduction of surgeon’s time required for the removal of sutures and staples at the final stages. Also, only 10% with graft edema were noted in the PRP treated patients as compared to 68% in the control group. The inner dressings and skin graft were dry in the PRP group and the post-operative etching, weeping and pain at the graft site reduced. CONCLUSION: The cosmetic appearance of this scar was better in the PRP group besides post-operative edema and graft loss. The study recommends use of PRP at the recipient site of split thickness skin graft.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6620803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66208032019-07-15 The Effectiveness of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma Application in the Wound Bed Prior to Resurfacing with Split Thickness Skin Graft vs. Conventional Mechanical Fixation Using Sutures and Staples Dhua, Subha Suhas, TR Tilak, BG World J Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) has significant benefits facilitating improved graft take on wound beds due to hemostasis, adhesive and healing properties. This study aimed at effective use of PRP in wound beds on graft take irrespective of etiology as compared to conventional methods of mechanical fixation using sutures and staples. METHODS: Forty cases including 20 in control and 20 in PRP groups admitted to the Department of Plastic Surgery at Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore were enrolled between October 2015 and September 2017. Freshly prepared autologous PRP was applied on wound beds in the treated group, while conventional mechanical fixation methods like staples and sutures were used in the control group for the fixation of the skin grafts. RESULTS: Most significant result was the instant graft take to the wound bed irrespective of the etiology besides hemostasis and healing properties in the PRP treated group which resulted in considerable reduction of surgeon’s time required for the removal of sutures and staples at the final stages. Also, only 10% with graft edema were noted in the PRP treated patients as compared to 68% in the control group. The inner dressings and skin graft were dry in the PRP group and the post-operative etching, weeping and pain at the graft site reduced. CONCLUSION: The cosmetic appearance of this scar was better in the PRP group besides post-operative edema and graft loss. The study recommends use of PRP at the recipient site of split thickness skin graft. Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6620803/ /pubmed/31309055 http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/wjps.8.2.185 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dhua, Subha
Suhas, TR
Tilak, BG
The Effectiveness of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma Application in the Wound Bed Prior to Resurfacing with Split Thickness Skin Graft vs. Conventional Mechanical Fixation Using Sutures and Staples
title The Effectiveness of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma Application in the Wound Bed Prior to Resurfacing with Split Thickness Skin Graft vs. Conventional Mechanical Fixation Using Sutures and Staples
title_full The Effectiveness of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma Application in the Wound Bed Prior to Resurfacing with Split Thickness Skin Graft vs. Conventional Mechanical Fixation Using Sutures and Staples
title_fullStr The Effectiveness of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma Application in the Wound Bed Prior to Resurfacing with Split Thickness Skin Graft vs. Conventional Mechanical Fixation Using Sutures and Staples
title_full_unstemmed The Effectiveness of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma Application in the Wound Bed Prior to Resurfacing with Split Thickness Skin Graft vs. Conventional Mechanical Fixation Using Sutures and Staples
title_short The Effectiveness of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma Application in the Wound Bed Prior to Resurfacing with Split Thickness Skin Graft vs. Conventional Mechanical Fixation Using Sutures and Staples
title_sort effectiveness of autologous platelet rich plasma application in the wound bed prior to resurfacing with split thickness skin graft vs. conventional mechanical fixation using sutures and staples
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6620803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31309055
http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/wjps.8.2.185
work_keys_str_mv AT dhuasubha theeffectivenessofautologousplateletrichplasmaapplicationinthewoundbedpriortoresurfacingwithsplitthicknessskingraftvsconventionalmechanicalfixationusingsuturesandstaples
AT suhastr theeffectivenessofautologousplateletrichplasmaapplicationinthewoundbedpriortoresurfacingwithsplitthicknessskingraftvsconventionalmechanicalfixationusingsuturesandstaples
AT tilakbg theeffectivenessofautologousplateletrichplasmaapplicationinthewoundbedpriortoresurfacingwithsplitthicknessskingraftvsconventionalmechanicalfixationusingsuturesandstaples
AT dhuasubha effectivenessofautologousplateletrichplasmaapplicationinthewoundbedpriortoresurfacingwithsplitthicknessskingraftvsconventionalmechanicalfixationusingsuturesandstaples
AT suhastr effectivenessofautologousplateletrichplasmaapplicationinthewoundbedpriortoresurfacingwithsplitthicknessskingraftvsconventionalmechanicalfixationusingsuturesandstaples
AT tilakbg effectivenessofautologousplateletrichplasmaapplicationinthewoundbedpriortoresurfacingwithsplitthicknessskingraftvsconventionalmechanicalfixationusingsuturesandstaples