Cargando…

Quantitative Analysis of Foot Plantar Pressure During Walking

BACKGROUND: There are many methods of dynamic analysis of foot loading, however, we still need a simple, easily applicable system for foot plantar pressure analysis. In this study we asked the question: “Can a new system for foot evaluation, the ITE System, provide a good quantitative dynamic foot p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jasiewicz, Barbara, Klimiec, Ewa, Młotek, Magdalena, Guzdek, Piotr, Duda, Sławomir, Adamczyk, Jakub, Potaczek, Tomasz, Piekarski, Jacek, Kołaszczyński, Grzegorz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6621646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31266932
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.914915
_version_ 1783434128235954176
author Jasiewicz, Barbara
Klimiec, Ewa
Młotek, Magdalena
Guzdek, Piotr
Duda, Sławomir
Adamczyk, Jakub
Potaczek, Tomasz
Piekarski, Jacek
Kołaszczyński, Grzegorz
author_facet Jasiewicz, Barbara
Klimiec, Ewa
Młotek, Magdalena
Guzdek, Piotr
Duda, Sławomir
Adamczyk, Jakub
Potaczek, Tomasz
Piekarski, Jacek
Kołaszczyński, Grzegorz
author_sort Jasiewicz, Barbara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are many methods of dynamic analysis of foot loading, however, we still need a simple, easily applicable system for foot plantar pressure analysis. In this study we asked the question: “Can a new system for foot evaluation, the ITE System, provide a good quantitative dynamic foot pressure analysis? Can it be used in clinical practice?”. MATERIAL/METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers, 8 females and 12 males, aged 20 to 25 years old took part in this study. Normal static foot loading was tested using a typical pedobarographic platform, followed by a dynamic analysis using the foot-pressure ITE System. A new algorithm for data analysis (from 8 sensors) was proposed. RESULTS: The sum of all maximal values from sensors was 11.71 N mean, with relatively low standard deviation (SD) of 1.81. Loading of sensor 1 (heel) was the highest – on average 29.84%. Sensor 2 (medial midfoot) received the lowest loading – normal range for this segment would be 0–4%. The manner of loading heel/toes, dynamics of changes in loading during gait was quite diverse; when analyzing courses of changes on sensors, 4 gait patterns were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the ITE System creates a new possibility for dynamic foot evaluation, drawing from pedobarography and methods of gait analysis. The proposed data analysis algorithm is simple and can be applied in all cases. Normally, 30% of the sum of all pressures during stance phase falls on the rearfoot; 39% falls on forefoot.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6621646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66216462019-07-30 Quantitative Analysis of Foot Plantar Pressure During Walking Jasiewicz, Barbara Klimiec, Ewa Młotek, Magdalena Guzdek, Piotr Duda, Sławomir Adamczyk, Jakub Potaczek, Tomasz Piekarski, Jacek Kołaszczyński, Grzegorz Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: There are many methods of dynamic analysis of foot loading, however, we still need a simple, easily applicable system for foot plantar pressure analysis. In this study we asked the question: “Can a new system for foot evaluation, the ITE System, provide a good quantitative dynamic foot pressure analysis? Can it be used in clinical practice?”. MATERIAL/METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers, 8 females and 12 males, aged 20 to 25 years old took part in this study. Normal static foot loading was tested using a typical pedobarographic platform, followed by a dynamic analysis using the foot-pressure ITE System. A new algorithm for data analysis (from 8 sensors) was proposed. RESULTS: The sum of all maximal values from sensors was 11.71 N mean, with relatively low standard deviation (SD) of 1.81. Loading of sensor 1 (heel) was the highest – on average 29.84%. Sensor 2 (medial midfoot) received the lowest loading – normal range for this segment would be 0–4%. The manner of loading heel/toes, dynamics of changes in loading during gait was quite diverse; when analyzing courses of changes on sensors, 4 gait patterns were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the ITE System creates a new possibility for dynamic foot evaluation, drawing from pedobarography and methods of gait analysis. The proposed data analysis algorithm is simple and can be applied in all cases. Normally, 30% of the sum of all pressures during stance phase falls on the rearfoot; 39% falls on forefoot. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2019-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6621646/ /pubmed/31266932 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.914915 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2019 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Jasiewicz, Barbara
Klimiec, Ewa
Młotek, Magdalena
Guzdek, Piotr
Duda, Sławomir
Adamczyk, Jakub
Potaczek, Tomasz
Piekarski, Jacek
Kołaszczyński, Grzegorz
Quantitative Analysis of Foot Plantar Pressure During Walking
title Quantitative Analysis of Foot Plantar Pressure During Walking
title_full Quantitative Analysis of Foot Plantar Pressure During Walking
title_fullStr Quantitative Analysis of Foot Plantar Pressure During Walking
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Analysis of Foot Plantar Pressure During Walking
title_short Quantitative Analysis of Foot Plantar Pressure During Walking
title_sort quantitative analysis of foot plantar pressure during walking
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6621646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31266932
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.914915
work_keys_str_mv AT jasiewiczbarbara quantitativeanalysisoffootplantarpressureduringwalking
AT klimiecewa quantitativeanalysisoffootplantarpressureduringwalking
AT młotekmagdalena quantitativeanalysisoffootplantarpressureduringwalking
AT guzdekpiotr quantitativeanalysisoffootplantarpressureduringwalking
AT dudasławomir quantitativeanalysisoffootplantarpressureduringwalking
AT adamczykjakub quantitativeanalysisoffootplantarpressureduringwalking
AT potaczektomasz quantitativeanalysisoffootplantarpressureduringwalking
AT piekarskijacek quantitativeanalysisoffootplantarpressureduringwalking
AT kołaszczynskigrzegorz quantitativeanalysisoffootplantarpressureduringwalking